Apple Seeks Early Motion to Reject Epic's Claim It's Being Denied iOS Access

As part of the Apple vs. Epic Games legal battle, Apple has filed a motion asking for a judge ruling on one of the ten claims that ‌Epic Games‌ had made against it. Specifically, Apple is seeking a partial judgment on the claim that iOS is an "essential facility" and denies Epic's claim that it has been unlawfully barred from accessing it through the App Store.

fortnite apple featured
The claim, specified in court filings as Count 2, refers to Epic's argument that it's been denied access to iOS, which it claims is an "essential facility" due to the fact it's been blocked access to the ‌App Store‌. The Count specifically accuses Apple of violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act through "its unlawful denial to Epic and other app distributors of an essential facility—access to iOS."

Apple is asking the judge to move forward with a judgment due to Epic's lack of "factual, expert, or legal support for its theory of essential facility" and that it has practically given up on attempting to prove it. Apple also cites testimony from one of Epic's own witnesses, who said during the trial regarding the ‌App Store‌ that nothing they say is referencing anything that can be deemed an "essential facility."

Epic’s experts did not opine on whether iOS is an essential facility, or whether Epic has been denied access to iOS. Rather, Dr. Evans admitted in his written direct testimony that Epic and other developers are provided "access to the tools and permissions for writing iOS apps."

And on the stand, Dr. Evans admitted that he was not "expressing any opinion on anything termed an essential facility or anything related to an essential facility claim in this case."

In the court filing, Apple says that the iOS ‌App Store‌ can easily be replicated and duplicated, and per the court's own definition, iOS is not an essential facility. Apple goes on to say that essential means "essential" and not what's "best," "most profitable or preferable."

Apple removed Fortnite and stripped Epic of access to its developer account in August of last year after it violated ‌App Store‌ Guidelines. To the court, Apple reiterated that Epic has access to the ‌App Store‌, despite its claim it's been unlawfully stripped of access to an "essential facility," as long as it follows the same rules that all developers are adhered to.

Apple notes that ‌Epic Games‌ had full access to the app distribution platform before it began "Project Liberty," Epic's codename for its legal fight against Apple.

There is no dispute that Epic actually has access to iOS. Epic, like all other developers, may obtain "access to the tools and permissions for writing iOS apps," and may distribute those apps through iOS, by agreeing to the DPLA. And Epic clearly did (prior to Project Liberty) distribute its apps through iOS and the App Store. So do millions of other developers.

Apple says that ‌Epic Games‌' real argument is not that it is illegally being denied access to the ‌App Store‌ and iOS, but that instead it does not like the terms and conditions that developers must follow on the platform.

The Epic Games vs. Apple trial officially started on May 3, and Apple is asking that its request for a partial judgment be entrained on May 24 or as soon as the court may hear its request.

Popular Stories

2024 iPhone Boxes Feature

iPhones Could Cost Up to $2,300 in the U.S. Due to Tariffs, Analyst Says

Friday April 4, 2025 9:30 am PDT by
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced that steep tariffs will be applied to imports from many countries, starting April 9. The tariffs could have a significant impact on Apple, as the company assembles the majority of iPhones in China, and products imported to the U.S. from China will be subject to a 54% tariff. iPhone prices could increase by up to 43% in the U.S. due to the...
iphone 16 pro colors 1

Is Now the Time to Upgrade Apple Devices Before Tariffs Lead to Price Increases?

Friday April 4, 2025 3:41 pm PDT by
If you have an older Apple device that you've been considering upgrading, you're probably wondering how the newly announced tariffs might impact prices going forward, and whether it's worth buying now before there's a price hike. Given analyst and economist responses to the tariffs, market panic, and Trump's stance on the current financial chaos, the answer is that making a purchase...
iOS 19 Mock WWDC25 Feature

iOS 19 Expected to Run on These iPhones

Monday March 31, 2025 5:28 pm PDT by
iOS 19 will not be available on the iPhone XR, iPhone XS, or the iPhone XS Max, according a private account on social media site X that has accurately provided information on device compatibility in the past. The iPhone XR, iPhone XS, and iPhone XS Max all have an A12 Bionic chip, so it looks like iOS 19 will discontinue support for that chip. All other iPhones that run iOS 18 are expected...
iPhone 17 Pro 3 4ths Perspective Aluminum Camera Module 1

iPhone 17 Pro's New Rear Camera Bar 'Same Color As Rest of Device'

Monday April 7, 2025 2:09 am PDT by
Apple's upcoming iPhone 17 Pro models will feature a redesigned rear camera panel that spans the width of the device, but it will be the same color as the iPhone itself, rather than being part of a two-tone design. That's according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Writing in his latest Power On newsletter, the reporter says the iPhone 17 Pro won't have a two-toned back, as some renders have...
iphone x front back

Apple Planning 'Bold' New 20th Anniversary Design for 2027 iPhone Pro

Monday April 7, 2025 2:46 am PDT by
Apple is preparing a "major shake-up" for the iPhone's 20th anniversary in 2027, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. iPhone X released in 2017 for 10th anniversary Writing in his latest Power On newsletter, Gurman says that Apple plans to launch a foldable iPhone alongside a "bold" new iPhone Pro model that makes more extensive use of glass. Could this mean Apple plans to realize former...
iPhone 17 Pro 34ths Perspective

iPhone 17 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 10 New Features

Sunday March 23, 2025 10:00 am PDT by
While the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models as of March 2025: Aluminum frame: iPhone 17 Pro models are rumored to have an aluminum frame, whereas the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro models have a titanium frame, and the iPhone ...

Top Rated Comments

Your Royal Highness Avatar
51 months ago
Essentially, Apple is saying to developers if you don’t follow the rules off with your head! And I agree. It’s their platform, their tools, their store and their rules. Maybe Epic should invest in making their own platform.
Score: 32 Votes (Like | Disagree)
krewger Avatar
51 months ago
I don’t understand how this is any different than a physical retailer. You want a product on the shelves, the retailer needs to profit from selling your item. If you try to circumvent the retailer from making money in their own store by selling it out of your own truck in their parking lot, they have every right to stop selling your product in your store. And for all those who say, but it’s my device I should choose what’s on it! I want to play smash bros on my Xbox but I had to buy a switch to play smash bros. I’d love to bring my electrical devices from England and plug them in to a US socket too, but it’s the wrong voltage and frequency.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
stocklen Avatar
51 months ago
surely this sentence is the crux of the issue:

"Apple says that Epic Games' real argument is not that it is illegally being denied access to the App Store and iOS, but that instead it does not like the terms and conditions that developers must follow on the platform. "


Im sorry I dont care whose side you are on..... Epic has made millions using the iOS app store so far and signed up to the terms and conditions of using it. It can rejoin the platform tomorrow if it chooses to follow the same rules that all the other developers have to follow. Its not being denied anything apart from the ability to make even more money off the platform that it already did.
I know this has been mentioned but other platforms that Epic peddles its wares on.. such as Playstation, Xbox, Google etc etc all have their fees and terms for using that platform - why should Apple be any different and why should a company dictate what another company chooses to charge when they have the choice themselves to use or not use the service.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
coredev Avatar
51 months ago

Essentially, Apple is saying to developers if you don’t follow the rules off with your head!
More like Apple is saying if you don't want to play by the rules, go play somewhere else.
BTW the same thing happened to Epic on the Google Play Store. Go figure.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BvizioN Avatar
51 months ago
Essential facility? Or Essential free money making platform that Epic wants it to be?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
stocklen Avatar
51 months ago

I don’t understand how this is any different than a physical retailer. You want a product on the shelves, the retailer needs to profit from selling your item. If you try to circumvent the retailer from making money in their own store by selling it out of your own truck in their parking lot, they have every right to stop selling your product in your store. And for all those who say, but it’s my device I should choose what’s on it! I want to play smash bros on my Xbox but I had to buy a switch to play smash bros. I’d love to bring my electrical devices from England and plug them in to a US socket too, but it’s the wrong voltage and frequency.
i agree

Im surprised at some of the anti-apple sentiment in here - especially for an Apple centric forum.

Im not defending apple as such... they are rich enough and make plenty of money to not need my defence...

However they created the iOS devices, they created the App store, and they set the terms for people to come in and use it to sell their software. Expensive? cheap? ive no idea but the developers go into it with eyes wide open and accepting the terms and conditions. In return they get the biggest global platform with the potential to earn millions in revenue - im pretty sure that Apple can and must charge what they like for the privilege.

Epic's behaviour has been childish - that anti apple ad was not just cobbled together and released the moment they ran into trouble.. no.. they preemptively picked this fight with apple... and apple made several attempts to appease the situation with the option of removing the developer account as the last resort and Epic dug their heels in and refused.

If I was Epic, and I really wanted this fight... then I would have at least acquiesced for the time being and left Fortnite on the app store without the rule-breaking code in it - and then picked the fight. They didn't do this and they are paying the price. Im pretty sure that Fortnite fans are getting their fix elsewhere on other platforms and Epic aren't really feeling much of a pinch here.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)