Root Access Sudo Bug Found to Affect macOS Big Sur

A sudo bug that can grant an attacker root access has been discovered to affect macOS Big Sur (via ZDNet).

sudo bug macos

The security vulnerability, identified last week as "CVE-2021-3156" by the Qualys Security Team, affects sudo, which is a program that allows users to run commands with the security privileges of another user, such as an administrator. The bug triggers a "heap overflow" in sudo that changes the current user's privileges to enable root-level access. This can give an attacker access to the entire system. An attacker would need to gain low-level access to a system first to be able to exploit the bug, such as via planted malware.

Sudo is part of many Unix-like systems, including macOS, but it was initially unknown if the vulnerability affected Mac machines since it was only tested by Qualys on Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora. Security researcher Matthew Hickey has now confirmed that the most recent version of macOS, macOS Big Sur 11.2 can be subject to the sudo attack.

Last week, there was speculation that the macOS Big Sur 11.2 update may address the sudo vulnerability, though it was not definitively known at the time if the bug would affect macOS. While it was found that sudo was left unchanged in macOS Big Sur 11.2, it is now clear that macOS is affected by the exploit.

With some minor modifications, Hickey found that the sudo bug could be used to grant attackers access to macOS root accounts, and the discovery has now been verified by Carnegie Mellon University vulnerability analyst Will Dormann.

Apple has reportedly been notified of the CVE-2021-3156 vulnerability, and due to the severity of the issue, a patch will likely be released soon.

Popular Stories

iPhone SE 4 Vertical Camera Feature

iPhone SE 4 Production Will Reportedly Begin Ramping Up in October

Tuesday July 23, 2024 2:00 pm PDT by
Following nearly two years of rumors about a fourth-generation iPhone SE, The Information today reported that Apple suppliers are finally planning to begin ramping up mass production of the device in October of this year. If accurate, that timeframe would mean that the next iPhone SE would not be announced alongside the iPhone 16 series in September, as expected. Instead, the report...
iPhone 17 Plus Feature

iPhone 17 Lineup Specs Detail Display Upgrade and New High-End Model

Monday July 22, 2024 4:33 am PDT by
Key details about the overall specifications of the iPhone 17 lineup have been shared by the leaker known as "Ice Universe," clarifying several important aspects of next year's devices. Reports in recent months have converged in agreement that Apple will discontinue the "Plus" iPhone model in 2025 while introducing an all-new iPhone 17 "Slim" model as an even more high-end option sitting...
Generic iPhone 17 Feature With Full Width Dynamic Island

Kuo: Ultra-Thin iPhone 17 to Feature A19 Chip, Single Rear Camera, Semi-Titanium Frame, and More

Wednesday July 24, 2024 9:06 am PDT by
Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo today shared alleged specifications for a new ultra-thin iPhone 17 model rumored to launch next year. Kuo expects the device to be equipped with a 6.6-inch display with a current-size Dynamic Island, a standard A19 chip rather than an A19 Pro chip, a single rear camera, and an Apple-designed 5G chip. He also expects the device to have a...
iPhone 16 Pro Sizes Feature

iPhone 16 Series Is Less Than Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Thursday July 25, 2024 5:43 am PDT by
Apple typically releases its new iPhone series around mid-September, which means we are about two months out from the launch of the iPhone 16. Like the iPhone 15 series, this year's lineup is expected to stick with four models – iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max – although there are plenty of design differences and new features to take into account. To bring ...
icloud private relay outage

iCloud Private Relay Experiencing Outage

Thursday July 25, 2024 3:18 pm PDT by
Apple’s iCloud Private Relay service is down for some users, according to Apple’s System Status page. Apple says that the iCloud Private Relay service may be slow or unavailable. The outage started at 2:34 p.m. Eastern Time, but it does not appear to be affecting all iCloud users. Some impacted users are unable to browse the web without turning iCloud Private Relay off, while others are...

Top Rated Comments

AttoA Avatar
45 months ago

Apple rushing beta software to market, again.
This vulnerability has been present for more than a decade in all sorts of UNIXes! It's not something at all limited to Apple's QA...
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Havalo Avatar
45 months ago


Attachment Image
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mannyvel Avatar
45 months ago

So, mostly free OSes. That's much of a defense....

Devs knew about the potential, and chose not to address it. They would rather rush a beta product to market.
One day you will learn more about software and you will look back at this comment and say "wow, I was totally clueless back then."
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Gabebear Avatar
45 months ago

Wow I thought this would have been patched out in 11.2. Hopefully we will get a
supplemental patch shortly.
It turns most fairly minor security issues into full-blown root exploits… fairly terrifying.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
opfor Avatar
45 months ago

I'd think we'd have better tools/procedures for finding bugs like this a lot sooner.

Is there not an automated tool that can look at some code and say "hey, right here it's possible for a heap overflow to occur and there's no error handling code to deal with it"?
Sure there are tools that catch some of these problems via static analysis etc and there are languages where this class of problems might not even occur.

But it is also true that the day that the CVE was released I updated my Linux servers and got a fixed/patched sudo, while even macOS 11.3 beta1 still has the issue, so this is also indicative of Apple release engineering capabilities, or lack of them.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
justperry Avatar
45 months ago

So is this a zero day, drive-by vulnerability? Or does the attacker have to have physical access?
Nope

"An attacker would need to gain low-level access to a system first to be able to exploit the bug, such as via planted malware."
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)