Video: Testing Windows on an M1 Mac With Parallels 16

Late last week, Parallels launched a Parallels Desktop 16 for Mac Technical Preview Program, which allows M1 Mac owners to use the Parallels software. Paired with a version of Arm-based Windows that's available through the Windows Insider program, it's possible to get Windows up and running on an Arm-based Mac.


In our latest YouTube video, we installed Parallels on an ‌M1‌ Mac and tested out Windows, but it didn't exactly go smoothly. When we first set up Parallels on an ‌M1‌ Mac, it was functional, but about an hour into the experience we kept running into errors attempting to get Windows working. It continually froze and the performance was abysmal.

With some tinkering and some troubleshooting help from the MacRumors forums, we were able to get it working well enough to test out. Parallels on the ‌M1‌ Mac is available as a Technical Preview and Windows can only be installed through Windows Insider, so neither of these are release versions of software. Given that we're working with beta software that's still in development, it's not surprising that there are issues that need to be worked out, and anyone who wants to test out Windows on an ‌M1‌ Mac through Parallels should expect to deal with bugs.

When running macOS Big Sur, the ‌M1‌ MacBook Pro with 8GB RAM has a single-core Geekbench score of 1719 and a multi-core score of 7384. When running Windows 10 through Parallels using the default two-core setting, the ‌M1‌ Mac achieved a single-core score of 1491 and a multi-core score of 2753.

That's pretty similar to Microsoft's own Surface Pro X in terms of multi-core performance, and better when it comes to single-core performance, so when it works, speeds aren't too bad. Parallels defaults to allowing just two cores when running Windows, but you can swap over to four core operation.

With four cores activated, multi-core Geekbench scores were much better, hitting 5013. The single-core score didn't improve quite as much at 1518. You can enable eight cores too, but going from four to eight cores did little for performance (1524 single core and 5958 multi-core).

In the four-core mode, there are some performance issues, so it's best to stick to the two-core default where possible. When an app is able to open and run, performance is solid, but there are a lot of bugs to deal with and a lot of software that does not work.

Many pre-installed apps don't function well and often refuse to open, but third-party apps like Geekbench seem to operate as expected. Paint 3D, the Xbox app, and the Calendar app refused to work, for example, but the Microsoft Edge browser and Office suite of apps were functional and performed decently. Third-party apps like Spotify, Notion, and others worked well, and the Windows VM is even capable of playing older games like Civilization IV and Skyrim.

Right now, getting Arm-based Windows on an ‌M1‌ Mac requires Parallels and the Windows Insider preview version of the software, and it continues to be unclear if Microsoft will make a release version of Arm Windows available for people to license.

Those who want to try out Windows (or another OS) on an ‌M1‌ Mac can sign up to try the Parallels Technical Preview.

Top Rated Comments

Chompineer Avatar
42 months ago

Errors, freezing, bad performance... sounds like typical windows to me.
Was the last time you used an windows machine during Vista or something?

This reads like fanboy garbage.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheDailyApple Avatar
42 months ago
Errors, freezing, bad performance... sounds like typical windows to me.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
NewUsername Avatar
42 months ago

A solution to a problem that pretty much does not exist. There's a very limited set of apps that run on Windows ARM and I suspect that they're already available on a Mac. I doubt many would need this.
ARM Windows also runs Intel apps (though the x64 emulator is still in beta). This would thus allow us to run a ton of Windows apps, including games, in an environment potentially much more reliable than CrossOver.

I honestly don't know why Microsoft doesn't work with Apple to make Boot Camp possible with ARM Windows. Perhaps in 1-2 years? Anyway, the first Intel Macs didn't have Boot Camp from day one either, so we might still see something in the future.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jdb8167 Avatar
42 months ago
The reason that many of the Windows apps don't run is that they are 32-bit Arm apps. For some reason known only to Microsoft, they compiled many apps as 32-bit and the M1 will not run 32-bit Arm binaries. Here is a list compiled by @Gnattu of all the 32-bit binaries. I'm guessing this will correlate to the apps that didn't run while testing for the article.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/parallels-tech-preview-for-m1.2275996/post-29412503
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
EatinPonies Avatar
42 months ago
"...but going from four to eight cores did little for performance (1524 single core and 5958 multi-core)."

Um... the difference between 4 and 8 cores is 945 points by your own numbers. 945 points is an increase of almost twenty percent (18.85%) going from 5013 to 5958... That's not insignificant!
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mrat93 Avatar
42 months ago

Right now, getting Arm-based Windows on an M1 Mac requires Parallels and the Windows Insider preview version of the software, and it continues to be unclear if Microsoft will make a release version of Arm Windows available for people to license.
Wouldn’t that make Macs the best Windows machines? If M1 is already beating official ARM Microsoft-branded PCs via virtualization, imagine the native performance benchmarks if you could install ARM Windows via Boot Camp.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

Apple car wheel icon feature yellow

Apple Cancels Electric Car Project

Tuesday February 27, 2024 11:05 am PST by
Apple has canceled all plans to release an autonomous, electric vehicle, reports Bloomberg. Apple has been working on an Apple Car for more than a decade and invested millions of dollars into development before deciding it was not a viable project. Apple's Chief Operating Officer Jeff Williams today told approximately 2,000 employees working on the Apple Car that the project was canceled,...
iOS 18 Mock iPhone 16 Feature Gray

iOS 18 Rumored to Be Compatible With These iPhone Models

Tuesday February 27, 2024 6:31 am PST by
iOS 18 will be compatible with the iPhone XR, and thereby also the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max models with the same A12 Bionic chip, according to a post on X today from a private account with a proven track record of sharing build numbers for upcoming iOS updates. The post was spotted by MacRumors contributor Aaron Perris, and it has since been deleted. However, this was likely because the...
iOS 17

iOS 17.4 Coming Soon With These New Features for Your iPhone

Monday February 26, 2024 6:08 am PST by
In a press release last month, Apple confirmed that iOS 17.4 will be released in March, and the update includes several new features and changes for the iPhone. Key new features in iOS 17.4 include major App Store changes in the EU, Apple Podcasts transcripts, and an iMessage security upgrade. The update also adds new emoji and includes preparations for the launch of next-generation CarPlay...
applearcade

Game Developers Describe 'Smell of Death' Around Apple Arcade

Monday February 26, 2024 7:24 am PST by
Some game developers are dissatisfied with Apple Arcade amid concerns about the subscription service's future, a new report claims. Sources speaking to mobilegamer.biz described a "smell of death" around Apple's games subscription service and noted the difference between the company's investment in TV and music, and its interest in games. "At the very top of the company there needs to be a ...
iPad Air 5

iPadOS 18 Rumored to Drop Support for These iPad Models

Tuesday February 27, 2024 6:55 am PST by
iPadOS 18 will drop support for iPad models equipped with the A10X Fusion chip, according to a post on X today from a private account with a proven track record of sharing build numbers for upcoming iOS and iPadOS updates. This means that iPadOS 18 would not be compatible with the first-generation 10.5-inch iPad Pro or the second-generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro models released in 2017. It...
Beyond iPhone 13 Better Blue Face ID Single Camera Hole

Six Reasons to Wait for Next Year's iPhone 17

Thursday February 22, 2024 4:20 am PST by
Apple's iPhone development roadmap runs several years into the future and the company is continually working with suppliers on several successive iPhone models concurrently, which is why we sometimes get rumored feature leaks so far ahead of launch. The iPhone 17 series is no different, and already we have some idea of what to expect from Apple's 2025 smartphone lineup. If you plan to skip...