New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Apple Has Fully Restored Inventory of Mid 2012 and Early 2013 MacBook Pro Batteries

Following over a year of shortages, Apple has fully replenished its supply of top case assemblies with glued-in batteries for Mid 2012 and Early 2013 models of the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display.

Mid 2012 MacBook Pro and its top case with battery via iFixit

A top case is the aluminum enclosure that houses the keyboard, trackpad, and speaker grilles on a MacBook Pro. For the two aforementioned models, the battery is affixed to the underside of the top case with strong adhesive, meaning the entire assembly needs to be swapped out for a simple battery replacement.

Now that inventory of the top cases is widely available again, Apple is "no longer offering free, delayed repairs" to customers with new service orders, according to its internal memo distributed to Apple Stores and Apple Authorized Service Providers on Tuesday and obtained by MacRumors from a reliable source.

Instead, Apple has resumed charging its standard out-of-warranty fee for all 15-inch MacBook Pro battery replacements, which is $199 in the United States. The fee is waived if the notebook is covered by an AppleCare+ plan.

Apple first notified service technicians about the "severe constraint" of the top cases in March 2017, when it temporarily stopped facilitating battery replacements. Apple expected the shortage to be resolved by September 15, 2017, but it later extended the date to November 15, 2017, and it evidently took longer.

As a temporary solution, Apple permitted customers to delay service until inventory became available, in exchange for Apple covering the full cost of the battery replacement. If a customer was unwilling to wait, however, Apple permitted them to exchange the MacBook Pro for a functionally equivalent model.

This generous policy resulted in many customers being able to exchange a 2012 MacBook Pro for a much newer model, such as a maxed-out refurbished 2016 MacBook Pro with Touch Bar, for just the $199 cost of a battery replacement. The only requirement was that the battery failed Apple's diagnostic test.

Apple stopped offering replacement units for repairs initiated after July 26, 2017, due to a temporary improvement in top case availability, but it began offering free, delayed battery replacements again for repairs initiated after August 25, 2017. That policy is what appears to be ending as of this week.

All in all, customers with a Mid 2012 or Early 2013 model 15-inch MacBook Pro who are in need of a new battery should be able to pay for the service without significant delays or other issues going forward. The process can be initiated from the Contact Apple Support page by selecting Mac → Mac Notebooks.

Related Roundup: MacBook Pro
Buyer's Guide: MacBook Pro (Buy Now)


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

23 weeks ago

Th glory days of the MacBook Pro lineup


Ain't that the truth. I remember when I bought my 12rMBP and I had my initial complaints. "How could they get rid of ethernet and the CD drive!". "I gotta carry this ethernet dongle everywhere now!". "What's the point of making it thinner". Within a couple months I was sold. I found myself on wireless everywhere I went and ditched the dongle, found all my media available electronically, and the size actually improved my day to day function when going from meeting to meeting.

This 2016 MBP I've had since day one is a different story. A year and a half later I don't even look at the touchbar (literally, only touched the ESC, which sucks when it's not physical, and power button). I'm still carrying around an even bigger dongle then what I had originally bought for my 2012 as I need both HDMI and USB-A for meetings, and the size made no difference (especially when I have to have a dongle velcroed to my laptop lid SMH). This laptop is the definition of poor functionality.
Rating: 13 Votes
23 weeks ago

I wonder if all this glued-together waste will find its way to Apple’s quarterly sustainabilty reports.


Amen. Recently people are beginning to study the total impact (e.g. C02 emissions) caused by consumers having to replace phones (and computers) rather than batteries. The environmental impact is substantial. Sadly Apple IS NOT a leader in true environmental stewardship. If they were, they would be the leader is showing how design prowess can be used to reduce and reuse devices. Sadly no economic incentive to do this, Tim gets to travel around and speak as a leader of an environmentally conscious company, and Jony gets lauded for essentially being the King of Thin despite his obvious disregard for the many pernicious affects this has had on durability and lifetime usage.
Rating: 10 Votes
23 weeks ago
I wonder if all this glued-together waste will find its way to Apple’s quarterly sustainabilty reports.
Rating: 9 Votes
23 weeks ago
Th glory days of the MacBook Pro lineup
Rating: 6 Votes
23 weeks ago
Amazing they are even supporting hardware on devices that are 6 years old, EVEN if it's $199 now. Good job Apple.
Rating: 4 Votes
23 weeks ago
I'm still happily rocking a 2012 retina MBP and very happy to see I could still get it serviced by Apple -- for now anyway.
Rating: 2 Votes
23 weeks ago
> Claims to be environmentally friendly
> Has to remove the entirety of the top assembly for just a battery replacement

Just Apple things.
Rating: 2 Votes
23 weeks ago
Classic Macbook Pro mid 2012 still kicking.
Rating: 2 Votes
23 weeks ago
Greed has no end. In 1997 Apple was happy to receive 150K pre-orders for the original iMac. Now the millions of sales are not enough, they plan the obsolescence and make it almost impossible to service on your own.

In the past I used to praise Apple for the quality of the hardware, which does not seem to be the case anymore, but even if so the software is updated so often you device won't be supported in 3-4 years.
Rating: 2 Votes
23 weeks ago
Apple requires third-party recyclers (who handle the vast amount of product) to shred all Apple devices. The robots you cite are a marketing endeavor (magical). However, that is not the issue. Apple does not build new phones from reclaimed parts. No one does. This issue is to not require the purchase of a new phone when a key component (battery) can be replaced. Had this been a focus in their design, Apple would have had a much greater environmental impact versus the absolutely insignificant affect of their robots. But they would have sold a lot fewer iPhones to date.

Which is precisely what Apple IS doing. Isn’t that the whole point of their disassembly and recycling robots?

I don’t recall any other company claiming to retrieve the lithium from recycled batteries, copper from recycled boards, etc. Nor has any other company stated a “closed loop supply chain” goal.

Their closed loop supply chain intends to do exactly what you claim they’re not. Reuse and extract raw materials back from dead components.

How might Apple achieve that if they put recycling and repairs in the hands of users? 9/10 users will probably just dump old batteries in the trash. Explain to me how that is a more environmentally conscious approach again?

Rating: 2 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]