Consumer Reports Pulls Purchase Recommendation for Microsoft Surface Devices

After previously giving four Microsoft Surface devices a purchase "recommendation" status, Consumer Reports today has pulled that status from the Microsoft products. The publication said that because of "poor predicted reliability" in comparison with rival brands, it can no longer recommend any Surface laptops or tablets to consumers.

The decision specifically targets four Microsoft Surface devices, including the Surface Book (128GB and 512GB versions) and the Surface Laptop (128GB and 256GB versions). Although only four devices are losing their previously designated "recommended" status, Consumer Reports pointed out that its inability to recommend Microsoft Surface products extends across the company's laptop and tablet devices, including the Surface Pro.


As usual, Consumer Reports based its decision on a survey conducted by its subscribers and the devices they own and use each day, this time focusing on over 90,000 tablets and laptops from multiple brands purchased between 2014 and early 2017. The study found that an estimated 25 percent of Microsoft tablets and laptops will "present their owners with problems" as soon as the end of the second year of ownership.

In its findings, the publication said the differences between the breakage rates of Microsoft devices and other brands were "statistically significant."
Microsoft’s estimated breakage rate for its laptops and tablets was higher than most other brands’. The differences were statistically significant, which is why Microsoft doesn’t meet CR’s standards for recommended products. The surveys are conducted annually. Microsoft defended the reliability of its laptops and tablets.
Originally, multiple Microsoft Surface products performed well in Consumer Reports' lab testing, but as time has passed and as more data has been collected a reliability issue has come into question. Survey respondents mentioned device startup problems, unexpected freezes or shut downs, and unresponsive touch screens, all occurring well after the devices were purchased.

Microsoft gave the following statement in an email sent to Consumer Reports regarding the new findings:
“Microsoft’s real-world return and support rates for past models differ significantly from Consumer Reports’ breakage predictability,” Microsoft said in an emailed statement. “We don’t believe these findings accurately reflect Surface owners’ true experiences or capture the performance and reliability improvements made with every Surface generation.”
Late last year, Apple was also denied a purchase recommendation from Consumer Reports for its 2016 MacBook Pro, because battery life "varied dramatically" from one trial to another. After working together to find the source of the issue at hand -- which Apple discovered to be a bug in a hidden Safari setting -- Consumer Reports reversed its decision and gave the new MacBook Pro devices a recommended purchase status.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)
Avatar
25 months ago
Totally agree with this, I'm on my third Surface in 5 months.
Rating: 19 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

Sounds like cr is bias.

agreed, could we get a publication that isn't biased towards facts and statistics? We need an Onion version of Consumer Reports to properly represent the people.
Rating: 18 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

Sounds like cr is bias.

The word is "biased", and how so?
Rating: 18 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.


No choice, its a work supplied device. And thats not the definition of insanity.
Rating: 13 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago
This is really weird timing. I was just in pc world with the sales guy trying to get me to buy one of these over the MacBook I went in for as the tweet notification came in.

Needless to say his arguments soon changed to getting the Mac instead
Rating: 8 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

Totally agree with this, I'm on my third Surface in 5 months.


The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Rating: 6 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

HAHAHA this is too good to be true. It is unfortunate that the Surface is buggy. I was enjoying the competition between MS and Apple.

Opinion:
There has never been any true competition between MS Surface devices and Apple devices. Surface sales have always been minuscule compared to the overall PC and Tablet markets. Surface devices have achieved 2 successes, 1 primary and the other secondary. The secondary success has been brand recognition. Between MS marketing and the tech media's proselytizing, people recognize the Surface brand. The primary success achieved by the Surface products is it's purpose for being: to serve as reference design to get PC OEM's to get off their collectives butts and deliver functional devices with compelling form. That they have done.
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago
Consumer Reports still exists?
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

Sounds like cr is bias.

Of course, anything that doesn't bash Apple and praise it's competitors is "biased".

I guess instead of reporting facts about the products of other companies, they should just make things up to make Apple look bad. Yeah, that would be really objective!
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
25 months ago

Consumer Reports still exists?

Only in the world of retiring baby boomers.
Rating: 4 Votes
[ Read All Comments ]