Australia Proposes Law That Would Compel Tech Companies to Decrypt Messages

Australia on Friday proposed new laws that would require companies like Apple to provide law enforcement authorities with access to encrypted communications (via Reuters).

Australia's proposed legislation will compel companies to help security agencies intercept and read messages sent by suspects. It appears to take cues from the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Bill, which includes provisions that require technology companies to bypass encryption where technically feasible.
"We need to ensure the internet is not used as a dark place for bad people to hide their criminal activities from the law," Australian Prim Minister Malcolm Turnbull told reporters in Sydney.

"The reality is, however, that these encrypted messaging applications and voice applications are being used obviously by all of us, but they're also being used by people who seek to do us harm."
The proposal will be introduced when parliament resumes in August and could be adopted within months, according to lawmakers. Other nations have said they will introduce similar laws.

Apple, along with Facebook, Google, and other major tech companies, have historically opposed such law changes, which they say threaten online security protocols.

For example, Apple claimed the U.K.'s recent bill would "weaken security" for millions of law-abiding customers. "The creation of backdoors and intercept capabilities would weaken the protections built into Apple products and endanger all our customers," Apple stated in December 2015. "A key left under the doormat would not just be there for the good guys. The bad guys would find it too."

Facebook rejected the need to introduce the new Australian law, insisting it already had a system in place to work alongside security agencies, while the new legislation could not be implemented on an individual basis.

"Weakening encrypted systems for them would mean weakening it for everyone," a spokeswoman for Facebook told Reuters.

Notably, Australia has not explained how the proposed law would prevent nefarious actors from using open-source encryption tools to encrypt messages that can be transferred through conventional means such as email.

Last month it was reported that Australia attended a meeting of officials from the "Five Eyes" intelligence sharing network, where it pushed for greater international powers to thwart the use of encrypted messaging services by terrorists and criminals.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)
Avatar
23 months ago
This is what fascism looks like.
Rating: 49 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
Western governments pt.1: accept millions of 3rd world muslim migrants. Illegally. Without even a simple background check.
Western governments pt.2: after terrorist attacks, take away freedom from their own citizens, making that country more and more like those from where those immigrants came from.


Makes sense.
Rating: 31 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
I mean there's never corruption at governmental level, is there, so what's the problem in giving them the keys to literally the whole shebang? :rolleyes: These people and what they propose are more dangerous than any terrorist threat.
Rating: 28 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
Haven't they learned from the FBI debacle? Apparently not.
Rating: 26 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
Australia and UK..two famous nanny states..
Rating: 17 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
Soon we will see arguments of how 'terrorists' and 'pedophiles' can get away if encryption is allowed.
Rating: 16 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
To put this in context: personal Medicare patient details were recently discovered for sale online on the dark web.
Rating: 13 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
Oh how I hate my government. They don't understand technology one bit. The NBN is just one example. They don't seem to understand the importance of encryption either.
Rating: 13 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago
Another example of the rights of law abiding citizens being eroded while the criminals activities will be unaffected.
Rating: 12 Votes
Avatar
23 months ago

What, the cops being able to tap people's phone lines when they are organising a crime? Please... cut the libertarian junk.

Yep, we should all be tapped for the extreme minority of people organizing crime over the phone, smh. Cut out the paranoid security state crap.

libertarian junk? Looks like the system you democrats and republicans built is doing just peachy huh?
Rating: 12 Votes
[ Read All Comments ]