Cryptography Experts Recommend Apple Replace its iMessage Encryption

IMessage_IconApple has implemented a series of short- and long-term defenses to its iMessage protocol after several issues were discovered by a team of researchers at Johns Hopkins University, according to a report published today (via PatentlyApple).

This attack is different to the one Johns Hopkins researchers discovered in March, which allowed an attacker to decrypt photos and videos sent over iMessage.

The technical paper details how another method known as a "ciphertext attack" allowed them to retrospectively decrypt certain types of payloads and attachments when either the sender or receiver is still online.

The scenario requires that the attacker intercepts messages using stolen TLS certificates or by gaining access to Apple's servers. While the attack takes a high level of technical expertise to be successful, the researchers note that it would be well within the means of state-sponsored actors.

Overall, our determination is that while iMessage’s end-to-end encryption protocol is an improvement over systems that use encryption on network traffic only (e.g., Google Hangouts), messages sent through iMessage may not be secure against sophisticated adversaries.

The team also discovered that Apple doesn't rotate encryption keys at regular intervals, in the way that modern encryption protocols such as OTR and Signal do. This means that the same attack can be used on iMessage historical data, which is often backed up inside iCloud. In theory, law enforcement could issue a court order forcing Apple to provide access to their servers and then use the attack to decrypt the data.

The researchers believe the attack could also be used on other protocols that use the same encryption format, such as Apple's Handoff feature, which transfers data between devices via Bluetooth. OpenPGP encryption (as implemented by GnuPGP) may be vulnerable to similar attacks when used in instant messaging applications, the paper noted.

Apple was notified of the issue as early as November 2015 and patched the iMessage protocol in iOS 9.3 and OS X 10.11.4 as a result. Since that time, the company has been pushing out further mitigations recommended by the researchers through monthly updates to several of its products.

However, the team's long-term recommendation is that Apple should replace the iMessage encryption mechanism with one that eliminates weaknesses in the protocol's core distribution mechanism.

The paper detailing the security issue is called Dancing on the Lip of the Volcano: Chosen Ciphertext Attacks on Apple iMessage, and was published as part of the USENIX Security Symposium, which took place in Austin, Texas. You can read the full paper here.

Popular Stories

airpods pro 3 purple

New, Higher End AirPods Pro Coming This Year

Tuesday January 20, 2026 9:05 am PST by
Apple is planning to debut a high-end secondary version of AirPods Pro 3 this year, sitting in the lineup alongside the current model, reports suggest. Back in September 2025, supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reported that Apple is planning to introduce a successor to the AirPods Pro 3 in 2026. This would be somewhat unusual since Apple normally waits around three years to make major...
iOS 27 Mock Quick

iOS 27 Will Add These 8 New Features to Your iPhone

Sunday January 18, 2026 3:51 pm PST by
iOS 27 is still many months away, but there are already plenty of rumors about new features that will be included in the software update. The first beta of iOS 27 will be released during WWDC 2026 in June, and the update should be released to all users with a compatible iPhone in September. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said that iOS 27 will be similar to Mac OS X Snow Leopard, in the sense...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

MacBook Pro Buyers Now Facing Up to a Two-Month Wait Ahead of New Models

Sunday January 18, 2026 6:50 pm PST by
MacBook Pro availability is tightening on Apple's online store, with select configurations facing up to a two-month delivery timeframe in the United States. A few 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro configurations with an M4 Pro chip are not facing any shipping delay, but estimated delivery dates for many configurations with an M4 Max chip range from February 6 to February 24 or even later. At...
smaller dynamic island iphone 18 pro Filip Vabrous%CC%8Cek

iPhone 18 Pro Leak: Smaller Dynamic Island, No Top-Left Camera Cutout

Tuesday January 20, 2026 2:34 am PST by
Over the last few months, rumors around the iPhone 18 Pro's front-panel design have been conflicted, with some supply-chain leaks pointing to under-display Face ID, reports suggesting a top-left hole-punch camera, and debate over whether the familiar Dynamic Island will shrink, shift, or disappear entirely. Today, Weibo-based leaker Instant Digital shared new details that appear to clarify the ...
iPhone Top Left Hole Punch Face ID Feature Purple

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Thursday January 15, 2026 10:56 am PST by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another eight months, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we have recapped 12 features rumored for the iPhone 18 Pro models, as of January 2026: The same overall design is expected, with 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch display sizes, and a "plateau" housing three rear cameras Under-screen Face ID...

Top Rated Comments

joe-h2o Avatar
123 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
It's more than just a medical school.

Jesus ****ing christ on a stick we're less than three comments in and 2/3 of them are dismissing this out of hand because it's not a 100% positive Apple story but a constructive criticism of how they can improve weaknesses in their cryptography.
Score: 40 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Telos101 Avatar
123 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
They have an Information Security Institute. Professor Matthew Green was part of the research team.

Green is part of the group which developed Zerocoin ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin'), an anonymous cryptocurrency ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency'). His research team has exposed flaws in more than one third of SSL/TLS ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security') encrypted web sites as well as vulnerabilities in encryption technologies, including RSA BSAFE ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_BSAFE'), Exxon/Mobil Speedpass ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedpass'), E-ZPass ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-ZPass'), and automotive security systems. In 2015, Green was a member of the research team that identified the Logjam ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logjam_(computer_security)') vulnerability in the TLS protocol.

Green is a member of the technical advisory board for the Linux Foundation Core Infrastructure Initiative, formed to address critical Internet security concerns in the wake of the Heartbleed ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbleed') security bug disclosed in April 2014 in the OpenSSL ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL') cryptography library.

He sits on the technical advisory boards for CipherCloud ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CipherCloud'), Overnest and Mozilla Cybersecurity Delphi. Green co-founded and serves on the Board for Directors of the Open Crypto Audit Project (OCAP), which undertook a security audit ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_audit') of the TrueCrypt ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueCrypt') software.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_D._Green
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
voxtro Avatar
123 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
Comments like these annoy me quite a bit (unless I'm missing some type of sarcasm). As an Apple user and someone with a background in cryptography who has actually read the entire paper, you don't need to have a MIT or Stanford paper to make a cryptanalysis. In cryptography papers are heavily peer reviewed and skepticism is part of the process the whole time. At the end of the day it boils down to mathematics and computer science and these are provable things, so it's not hypothesis. The paper includes examples of how the attacks can be carried out and under specific conditions. It explains the protocols and the exact mechanisms used to extract the payloads in their settings. All the caveats are stated. Also, it does state that Apple implemented a lot of their recommendations in later versions of iOS and OS X/macOS (their paper references iOS 9.3 and OS X 10.11.4 or later)
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
joe-h2o Avatar
123 months ago
I think I read this on news.google.com.au.... sounds like a beat up to me. Next....
You have to read more than just the title before you can make an informed comment.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
aplnub Avatar
123 months ago
I think I read this on news.google.com.au.... sounds like a beat up to me. Next....
Doesn't sound like a beat up to me. Sounds like good advice and it seems Apple has been favorable at receiving advice in the past. Hopefully, they address the concerns for all our sakes.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
aplnub Avatar
123 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
A school cannot be great at more than one field?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)