Cryptography Experts Recommend Apple Replace its iMessage Encryption

IMessage_IconApple has implemented a series of short- and long-term defenses to its iMessage protocol after several issues were discovered by a team of researchers at Johns Hopkins University, according to a report published today (via PatentlyApple).

This attack is different to the one Johns Hopkins researchers discovered in March, which allowed an attacker to decrypt photos and videos sent over iMessage.

The technical paper details how another method known as a "ciphertext attack" allowed them to retrospectively decrypt certain types of payloads and attachments when either the sender or receiver is still online.

The scenario requires that the attacker intercepts messages using stolen TLS certificates or by gaining access to Apple's servers. While the attack takes a high level of technical expertise to be successful, the researchers note that it would be well within the means of state-sponsored actors.

Overall, our determination is that while iMessage’s end-to-end encryption protocol is an improvement over systems that use encryption on network traffic only (e.g., Google Hangouts), messages sent through iMessage may not be secure against sophisticated adversaries.

The team also discovered that Apple doesn't rotate encryption keys at regular intervals, in the way that modern encryption protocols such as OTR and Signal do. This means that the same attack can be used on iMessage historical data, which is often backed up inside iCloud. In theory, law enforcement could issue a court order forcing Apple to provide access to their servers and then use the attack to decrypt the data.

The researchers believe the attack could also be used on other protocols that use the same encryption format, such as Apple's Handoff feature, which transfers data between devices via Bluetooth. OpenPGP encryption (as implemented by GnuPGP) may be vulnerable to similar attacks when used in instant messaging applications, the paper noted.

Apple was notified of the issue as early as November 2015 and patched the iMessage protocol in iOS 9.3 and OS X 10.11.4 as a result. Since that time, the company has been pushing out further mitigations recommended by the researchers through monthly updates to several of its products.

However, the team's long-term recommendation is that Apple should replace the iMessage encryption mechanism with one that eliminates weaknesses in the protocol's core distribution mechanism.

The paper detailing the security issue is called Dancing on the Lip of the Volcano: Chosen Ciphertext Attacks on Apple iMessage, and was published as part of the USENIX Security Symposium, which took place in Austin, Texas. You can read the full paper here.

Popular Stories

maxresdefault

Apple Shows Off a Key Reason to Upgrade to the iPhone 17

Saturday February 7, 2026 9:26 am PST by
Apple today shared an ad that shows how the upgraded Center Stage front camera on the latest iPhones improves the process of taking a group selfie. "Watch how the new front facing camera on iPhone 17 Pro takes group selfies that automatically expand and rotate as more people come into frame," says Apple. While the ad is focused on the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, the regular iPhone...
apple wallet drivers license feature iPhone 15 pro

Apple Says These 7 U.S. States Plan to Offer iPhone Driver's Licenses

Monday February 9, 2026 6:24 am PST by
In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps. The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future. To set up the...
Apple Logo Zoomed

Apple Expected to Launch These 10+ Products Over the Coming Months

Tuesday February 10, 2026 6:33 am PST by
It has been a slow start to 2026 for Apple product launches, with only a new AirTag and a special Apple Watch band released so far. We are still waiting for MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the iPhone 17e, a lower-cost MacBook with an iPhone chip, long-rumored updates to the Apple TV and HomePod mini, and much more. Apple is expected to release/update the following products...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

New MacBook Pros Could Now Arrive in March

Sunday February 8, 2026 6:02 am PST by
New MacBook Pro models with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips could arrive as soon as Monday, March 2, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that the release of new MacBook Pro models is tied to the release of macOS Tahoe 26.3. The launch is said to be slated for as early as the week of March 2. He added that the M4 Pro and M4 Max models on sale today...
m5 macbook pro deal

Why You Shouldn't Buy the Next MacBook Pro

Tuesday February 10, 2026 4:27 pm PST by
Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models as soon as early March, but if you can, this is one generation you should skip because there's something much better in the works. We're waiting on 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, with few changes other than the processor upgrade. There won't be any tweaks to the design or the display, but later this...

Top Rated Comments

joe-h2o Avatar
124 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
It's more than just a medical school.

Jesus ****ing christ on a stick we're less than three comments in and 2/3 of them are dismissing this out of hand because it's not a 100% positive Apple story but a constructive criticism of how they can improve weaknesses in their cryptography.
Score: 40 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Telos101 Avatar
124 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
They have an Information Security Institute. Professor Matthew Green was part of the research team.

Green is part of the group which developed Zerocoin ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin'), an anonymous cryptocurrency ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency'). His research team has exposed flaws in more than one third of SSL/TLS ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security') encrypted web sites as well as vulnerabilities in encryption technologies, including RSA BSAFE ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_BSAFE'), Exxon/Mobil Speedpass ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedpass'), E-ZPass ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-ZPass'), and automotive security systems. In 2015, Green was a member of the research team that identified the Logjam ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logjam_(computer_security)') vulnerability in the TLS protocol.

Green is a member of the technical advisory board for the Linux Foundation Core Infrastructure Initiative, formed to address critical Internet security concerns in the wake of the Heartbleed ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbleed') security bug disclosed in April 2014 in the OpenSSL ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL') cryptography library.

He sits on the technical advisory boards for CipherCloud ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CipherCloud'), Overnest and Mozilla Cybersecurity Delphi. Green co-founded and serves on the Board for Directors of the Open Crypto Audit Project (OCAP), which undertook a security audit ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_audit') of the TrueCrypt ('https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueCrypt') software.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_D._Green
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
voxtro Avatar
124 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
Comments like these annoy me quite a bit (unless I'm missing some type of sarcasm). As an Apple user and someone with a background in cryptography who has actually read the entire paper, you don't need to have a MIT or Stanford paper to make a cryptanalysis. In cryptography papers are heavily peer reviewed and skepticism is part of the process the whole time. At the end of the day it boils down to mathematics and computer science and these are provable things, so it's not hypothesis. The paper includes examples of how the attacks can be carried out and under specific conditions. It explains the protocols and the exact mechanisms used to extract the payloads in their settings. All the caveats are stated. Also, it does state that Apple implemented a lot of their recommendations in later versions of iOS and OS X/macOS (their paper references iOS 9.3 and OS X 10.11.4 or later)
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
joe-h2o Avatar
124 months ago
I think I read this on news.google.com.au.... sounds like a beat up to me. Next....
You have to read more than just the title before you can make an informed comment.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
aplnub Avatar
124 months ago
I think I read this on news.google.com.au.... sounds like a beat up to me. Next....
Doesn't sound like a beat up to me. Sounds like good advice and it seems Apple has been favorable at receiving advice in the past. Hopefully, they address the concerns for all our sakes.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
aplnub Avatar
124 months ago
John Hopkins is a renowned medical school in Baltimore. What makes them the experts on cryptography?
A school cannot be great at more than one field?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)