Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions

appstoreApple is planning to alter its pricing formula for subscriptions in a major change that will benefit subscription-based apps and services like Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, and more, reports Financial Times. Apple is said to be considering changing the 30 percent fee that it currently charges and is discussing new commercial terms with media companies.

At the current point in time, all apps and in-app subscriptions work on a 30/70 split. Apple gets 30 percent of what's paid for an app or service, while the company or developer offering the app gets a 70 percent cut. That means when someone purchases Netflix through the Netflix iOS app, Apple gets over $2 of the fee paid. At the same time, Apple has disallowed direct links to outside subscription sign up services within apps, ensuring it gets its fee.

Apple's 30 percent subscription cut has been a sticking point for many companies, especially those with tight margins like music services, and it's gotten Apple into hot water in the past, most notably during the e-book price fixing case levied against it by the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to the Financial Times, changing the App Store subscription terms could make Apple devices more appealing to content creators while also lessening potential pressure from regulators.

Changing the App Store's terms of trade could improve the economics of online content businesses and reassure regulators that the company is not abusing its position as gatekeeper to one of the world's most lucrative digital marketplaces.

On the Apple TV, Apple is already offering a more generous split, taking just 15 percent of revenue generated from subscription services like the recently released HBO Now.

There are no specifics on the terms that Apple is potentially considering for companies that offer subscription services, but it appears that the price cuts at this time will not extend to standalone apps.

Popular Stories

Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Working on Plan to Allow AI Agent Apps on the App Store

Wednesday May 13, 2026 11:02 am PDT by
Apple is looking into ways to better support apps that include AI agents and AI coding capabilities in the App Store, reports The Information. Apple is designing a system that would maintain its security and privacy standards while allowing for AI app features, but details on how the system will work are unavailable. Apple started blocking updates for some popular vibe coding apps in March...
apple india

India Refuses to Let Apple Pause App Store Antitrust Case

Tuesday May 19, 2026 4:52 am PDT by
An Indian court has ruled that Apple must cooperate with a government investigation into its App Store practices, rejecting the company's attempt to put the case on hold (via Reuters). The Delhi High Court ruling keeps a probe by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) alive, which found in 2024 that Apple had abused its dominant position in the iPhone apps market. The CCI wants Apple's...
fortnite apple featured

Fortnite Returns to the App Store Worldwide as Epic Signals 'Final Battle' With Apple

Tuesday May 19, 2026 6:08 am PDT by
Fortnite is back on the App Store in every country except Australia, Epic Games announced today, as the company declared it is entering the "final battle" of its long-running legal dispute with Apple. Epic said the decision to push Fortnite back onto iOS globally was prompted by Apple's own words to the U.S. Supreme Court, in which Apple acknowledged that "regulators around the world are...

Top Rated Comments

AngerDanger Avatar
144 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
If you find yourself unsatisfied with any information obtained on MR, simply returned the unused portions for a full refund. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Crosscreek Avatar
144 months ago
Gwad, I hope Apple doesn't go broke doing this.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SgtPepper12 Avatar
144 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
144 months ago
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
A challenger appears!
So how about 0%, what they deserve for services that run completely independently from them?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
144 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
Yeah because developers don't use MacRumors...
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
furi0usbee Avatar
144 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
??? Why would this information need to be private?
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)