"Hey Siri" support and possibly wireless charging case alongside AirPower charging mat.
AirPods and AirPower: Everything We Know
L.A. School District Cancels iPad Pearson Curriculum, Asks Apple for Refund
Following the end of the $1.3 billion education initiative that would have seen all students in the Los Angeles school district outfitted with an iPad, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) has notified Apple that it will no longer be using or paying for the Pearson Education curriculum that was meant to accompany the iPads.
In a letter sent to Apple and shared in part by the Los Angeles Times, the LAUSD asked for a refund and said it has no plans to "accept or compensate Apple for new deliveries of [Pearson Education] curriculum."
When the school district entered into a contract with Apple, it paid approximately $768 per iPad, which included approximately $200 towards a three-year license for math and English curriculum from Pearson that was meant to replace many textbooks and other learning tools. The materials went largely unused by the district due to technical problems and the quality of the software.
Apple and the Los Angeles Unified School District first entered into a $30 million agreement in 2013, which saw 35,000 iPads being distributed to 47 schools as part of a pilot program. The deal was meant to expand to a $1.3 billion initiative to provide all 640,000 students in the district with iPads, but it began falling apart soon after iPads were distributed to students.
Apple's contract with the LAUSD has since been under scrutiny from the FBI, under accusations that former L.A. superintendent John Deasy may have modified the bidding process for the initiative to favor Apple and Pearson due to ties with executives at Pearson.
In a letter sent to Apple and shared in part by the Los Angeles Times, the LAUSD asked for a refund and said it has no plans to "accept or compensate Apple for new deliveries of [Pearson Education] curriculum."
When the school district entered into a contract with Apple, it paid approximately $768 per iPad, which included approximately $200 towards a three-year license for math and English curriculum from Pearson that was meant to replace many textbooks and other learning tools. The materials went largely unused by the district due to technical problems and the quality of the software.
"As you are aware, LAUSD is extremely dissatisfied with the work of Pearson," according to an April 13 letter signed by general counsel David Holmquist. "While Apple and Pearson promised a state-of-the-art technological solution ... they have yet to deliver it."The letter asks for a meeting with Apple to discuss the dissolution of the district's deal with Pearson and a refund for the licenses that it was not able to use, letting it recoup some of the cost that it paid for the failed iPad initiative.
Despite demands to fix the problem, the letter said that "the vast majority of our students are still unable to access the Pearson curriculum on iPads."
Apple and the Los Angeles Unified School District first entered into a $30 million agreement in 2013, which saw 35,000 iPads being distributed to 47 schools as part of a pilot program. The deal was meant to expand to a $1.3 billion initiative to provide all 640,000 students in the district with iPads, but it began falling apart soon after iPads were distributed to students.
Apple's contract with the LAUSD has since been under scrutiny from the FBI, under accusations that former L.A. superintendent John Deasy may have modified the bidding process for the initiative to favor Apple and Pearson due to ties with executives at Pearson.
[ 134 comments ]
Top Rated Comments
(View all)
50 months ago
Sad.
In theory this program should have been a hit. Poor software and technical support are to blame. Apple need to focus more in this area if they want a program like this to succeed. Education has taken a back seat to gold watches and bling.
In theory this program should have been a hit. Poor software and technical support are to blame. Apple need to focus more in this area if they want a program like this to succeed. Education has taken a back seat to gold watches and bling.
50 months ago
As anyone who has taken a college course can tell you, textbook publication is a business full of slimeballs. Apple entering into an agreement alongside them was a mistake.
50 months ago
Even though I teach in a modern classroom where every student has a laptop and I have a SmartBoard I still use textbooks for quite a bit of my instruction. Why? Because they are faster and just work.:)
50 months ago
I used pen and paper and i turned out just good.
That's nothing, I have great great ancestors that carved into stone and they ended up just fine.
50 months ago
As a Math Instructor, I can say that a lot of what I have seen publishers pushing as "interactive" and "user-friendly" is neither. They just want to rush to get something out ahead of the other publishers.
I chuckled when I read that Pearson did not have their on-line stuff together. Typical.
I chuckled when I read that Pearson did not have their on-line stuff together. Typical.
50 months ago
I am a math teacher that uses MyMathLab which is a Pearson product. I have owned every iPad... and see tremendous potential for its use in the classroom. Apple makes a great product... but there is no publishing company... including Pearson... that is able to utilize the iPad effectively. The software has to work seamlessly so the user can learn without the software getting in the way. I think it was far too early for Apple to invest in Pearson technology like this. They put their name on the line... and I don't think that was smart. The idea is great... but Pearsons products are not at a level that can be effective on the iPad. Pearson books and the MyMathLab learning environment are not optimized for the iPad. In fact, I found far too many glitches and hangups trying to use their product on the iPad. And he design is terrible. I was asked to test MyMathLab on the iPad. I gave up over a few months because the user experience was horrible and there were far too many bugs. I cannot ask my students to use it if even I can't use it effectually. I think apple Ibooks authoring has more potential then Pearsons ibooks. As far as the learning platform... MyMathlab has far too many problems to be used effectively on the iPad.
50 months ago
This project was a joke from the start.
I worked at Pearson here in the Bay Area building a lot of the classroom content for the app.
Things were rushed to the point that we didn't have time to polish almost anything, and a lot of this b grade material ended up in the hands of students.
Project managers were pushed by their superiors higher up the ladder to adapt a quantity over quality approach to content creation and delivery. It made it a hard environment to work in, as if you were to point out flaws or inconsistencies to anyone your cry would go unnoticed.
They were rushing because they over sold the scope of the product then tried to cover it up by overloading the school district with an over delivery of sub par content. It smelled a lot like a premeditated scheme in the sense that they were getting very large checks written for concepts and products that didn't even exist yet.
On the day they launched with LAUSD, I could literally crash the app on demand in over 10 different ways by simply tapping in certain areas.
LAUSD got played hard.
I worked at Pearson here in the Bay Area building a lot of the classroom content for the app.
Things were rushed to the point that we didn't have time to polish almost anything, and a lot of this b grade material ended up in the hands of students.
Project managers were pushed by their superiors higher up the ladder to adapt a quantity over quality approach to content creation and delivery. It made it a hard environment to work in, as if you were to point out flaws or inconsistencies to anyone your cry would go unnoticed.
They were rushing because they over sold the scope of the product then tried to cover it up by overloading the school district with an over delivery of sub par content. It smelled a lot like a premeditated scheme in the sense that they were getting very large checks written for concepts and products that didn't even exist yet.
On the day they launched with LAUSD, I could literally crash the app on demand in over 10 different ways by simply tapping in certain areas.
LAUSD got played hard.
[ Read All Comments ]
The Gardena Smart System is now compatible with Apple's HomeKit, thanks to the availability of a software update that brings HomeKit integration to Gardena devices like the Smart Water Control,...
Apple this week was awarded a patent for a potential Apple Watch design featuring a flexible microLED display that integrates with and encompasses almost the entire watch band.
Titled...
In his wide-ranging research note today touching on Apple's product releases for 2019, Ming-Kuo provided a glimpse at upcoming AirPods, iPads, iPhones, displays and MacBook Pros. Regarding the...
For this week's giveaway, we've teamed up with Astropad to offer MacRumors readers a chance to win a Luna Display adapter. The Luna Display is a handy little dongle that's designed to...
In late November, Apple launched a limited time promotion that offers up to $100 in additional credit when trading in an iPhone 6 through iPhone 8 towards the purchase of a new iPhone XS or...
Apple today filed its 2018 Conflict Minerals Report with the SEC as part of its commitment to supplier responsibility.
Apple said it remains "deeply committed" to upholding human...
Apple's Beats by Dre brand today unveiled a new NBA collection, with Beats Studio 3 Wireless Headphones available in six colorways representing the Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Lakers,...
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey today commented on the possibility of an edit button for tweets, suggesting Twitter is considering a feature that might let people go back and add clarifications or...
