Did Apple Spend $2 Billion to Bail Out Sharp? - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Did Apple Spend $2 Billion to Bail Out Sharp?

Apple analyst Horace Dediu has dug deep into Apple's 2012 capital expenditures and found some spending, above and beyond what Apple had previously disclosed. He discovered that Apple spent $2.3 billion more than it had forecast on "product tooling, manufacturing process equipment and infrastructure".

Sharplogo
However, Apple didn't actually shell out cash for its increase in CapEx, but instead is booking vendor financing. Dediu believes it may have been to bail out Sharp, which was in dire financial straits earlier this year.

Circumstantial evidence points to the asset being production equipment (or even a whole plant) previously owned by Sharp. Sharp is a key supplier of screens to Apple but is also in financial distress. Sharp has also been the object of an intended investment by Foxconn [Hon Hai]. That deal fell through as Sharp’s finances deteriorated. My guess is that these attempts to shore up Sharp are directed by Apple to ensure both continuity of supply and a balanced supplier base (offsetting Samsung, another supplier.) If Sharp were to enter into some form of bankruptcy, the key plant(s) used in producing screens for Apple might be "up for grabs" by creditors and they might be taken off-line, jeopardizing Apple’s production capacity, irrespective of contractual obligations. I believe that Apple’s late and unprecedented expenditure was to secure this asset. I further believe that the financing for this deal was done through a swap of "pre-orders".

Dediu has much more on the spending and his analysis at Asymco.

Popular Stories

iphone duo

Apple Announces Foldable 'iPhone Duo'

Wednesday September 9, 2026 10:56 am PDT by
Apple today announced the "iPhone Duo," a new kind of iPhone featuring two screens and a foldable inner display. The two halves of the iPhone Duo connect into a single continuous frame with the same aspect ratio across both displays, and Apple said the transition between open and closed is designed to feel fluid. When fully open, Apple says it is the thinnest iPhone ever made, with an...
Surprise and Shine Live Coverage Article

Apple Event Live Blog: iPhone Duo, iPhone 18 Pro, and More

Wednesday September 9, 2026 9:10 am PDT by
Apple's "Surprise and Shine" event kicks off today at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, where we're expecting to see the foldable iPhone Duo, the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max, Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4 models, new AirPods 5 earphones, and perhaps some other announcements. Apple is providing a live video stream on its website, on YouTube, and in the company's TV app across various platforms. We...
iOS 27 Feature Dark

Apple Announces iOS 27 Release Date

Wednesday September 9, 2026 10:46 am PDT by
At its event today unveiling the iPhone 18 Pro, AirPods 5, Apple Watch Series 12, and more, Apple announced that iOS 27 will be released later this month. iOS 27 has already been available as a developer beta since June and as a public beta since July, and Apple today said that the update will be released for all users with a compatible iPhone model on Monday, September 14. iOS 27 is...

Top Rated Comments

turtlez Avatar
181 months ago
Nice to see Apple playing nicely for once rather than suing!

Suing for good reason is hardly being mean. How would you like it if someone came along and stole your designs that you work on all year round.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
181 months ago
Why not just buy Sharp at a steep discount?
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
nuckinfutz Avatar
181 months ago
Nice to see Apple playing nicely for once rather than suing!

There's nothing wrong with suing. Courts are here to handle conflict resolution in a civil matter. Hundreds of years ago people spilled blood over these types of conflicts (territory, resources etc). Please stop trying to demonize a civil process that has saved millions upon millions of lives.


Back on topic:

I hope this is an investment. Remember Apple invested 500 million in LG to enable higher production. Sharp is moving over wholesale to IGZO panels but that cost money and their HDTV business dried up.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
NT1440 Avatar
181 months ago
They're not really though. Had they played nice, they wouldn't be forced to rely on Sharp and could use Samsung's production facilities. Instead, they didn't play nice and this 2 billion bailout is a consequence.

Yup, this is completely one sided. Samsung has no responsibility in the relationship between them an Apple deteriorating. :rolleyes:

It's two massive companies having a pissing match.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gmanist1000 Avatar
181 months ago
Makes sense if they want to move away from Samsung displays.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
realeric Avatar
181 months ago
Better than burning the money for stock dividends.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)