Apple Reportedly Offers Proview $16 Million for iPad Trademark

So it's ok for a company to violate trademarks in your opinion?

Nick, if you read all of the documentation on the court case, you'll quickly see that it is not really about trademark violation but did Proview lie about what they were doing. There is a lot of shady stuff going on from the Proview side, and I couldn't find anything on the Apple side that looks "shady" besides using a shell company to buy the iPad name. And this really isn't my opinion either, if you read the ruling from the HK court, you'll see that they found that not only does Apple own the Trademarks that they legitimately purchased, but that Proview IS acting in a very deceptive manor and in a potentially criminal way.

Quick synopsys of what's going on :
[LIST=1]
* Apple Shell company wants to buy iPad trademark from Proview for the HK, Taiwan, and China markets.
* Apple contacts Proview-China and makes an offer that they initially accept.
* Proview-China says they don't own the rights to it, Proview-Taiwan does. (Email paper chain shows this)
* Apple makes arrangements with Proview-Taiwan for all three licenses, and gets them signed off by Proview-Taiwan by (I think the authorization was signed by the CEO or someone on the board of directors).
* Proview transfers rights to Apple . . . except for an issue with the bankruptcy court in China.
* Later Proview-China claims that Proview-Taiwan didn't have the rights to sell of the trademark.
* The person in Proview-Taiwan who authorized the sale of the Proview-China trademark ** IS ** the Proview-China CEO (he has multiple roles within the Proview organization).


That Last bullet point is the real kicker. The same guy who has the authority in two different divisions to sell the iPad trademarks, sells it from one division and then claims that HE shouldn't have sold it from the other.

Sorry, it's extortion at it's finest.

That's $16 million too much.

Apple shouldn't pay this. They should just rename the iPad in China to iPaid (with the second 'I' in pale grey) :)

BTW, the main cause of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking a 0 in their number system, they had no way to indicate the successful termination of their C programs :p

Apple is not a welfare state to save Proview from itself.

BTW it is Proview claiming there is a $16m offer on the table, not Apple.

Apple can go to the bankruptcy judge, point out the lawsuit has large fixed costs to persue and uncertain benefits if they even prevail which is unlikely given the existing rulings in Taiwan and California, and buy the asset of the trademark and lawsuit for $0.50 on the condition Apple does not seek legal costs from the bankrupt estate so what few actual assets that do exist go to the top of list secure creditors. The downside is there could be a ruling of fraud, priority payment of damages as a penalty, and the BK estate could be further diminished for valid secured creditors.

Give 'em an inch, they'll take a mile ;)

Give 'em an inch, they'll take a mile ;)

Exactly. They’ll be back in six months saying “Apple KNEW they were paying us $16 mil for nothing, and they willfully kept using the iPad trademark anyway! Seize all iPads! We demand 25% of Apple profits as is our right! We created the iPAD name when we made our iMac clone and iPAD was the closest Apple-rip-off we could come up with! And once we have our 25%—make that 50%—then THIS time, we will honor our original deal. Simon says!”

Extortion at its finest!

Rome fell because of all its lawyers (yes, Roman Empire had lawyers).

(Couple million what I would give).

BTW, what if ProView goes bankrupt and goes away? Suit will die?

Game theory at its finest. Apple offering 16 million is a fun move, and says something about their strategy here. Now knowing that Proview is 400 million in debt means they are in a desperate position here, which Apple can leverage. Ooooohhh snap!

Do many of you not realize this trademark is suppose to affect all the iPads made in China and therefore to be used around the world; if it was simple as the iPads sold in China, then it would be a much less convenient decision.

Not true

While I think Proview is 100% wrong and owed nothing, I can't help feeling this is what Apple gets for using such a crappy name like "iPad". It sounded like a feminine hygiene product 2 yrs ago and it still sounds lame today.

And what of the mouse pad? Is it a product for female mice? Cooling pads for laptops--are they really for women going through menopause? An art pad--only for men who menstruate? Legal pad? Game pad? Let's not forget that hygiene product designed exclusively for Asian women: pad thai :rolleyes: