New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Apple's 1.3 MP Camera-Equipped iPod Nano Due for Launch in March/April? [Updated]

Earlier today, we reported on new photos of an iPod nano casing that appears to support a rear-facing camera. With similar photos having shown up in the past, it was unclear whether Apple was still pursuing the design for a future iPod nano.


M.I.C gadget now weighs in with claims that the pictured device is in fact a two-month old prototype but that Apple has been having difficulties with the 1.3-megapixel camera taking overexposed photos.
It’s real, and it’s a two-month-old prototype that has big problems. It comes with an auto iris lens that can be affected by diffraction and blurring when the iris opening becomes too small in bright conditions. Ok, I gotta say it simply, it takes overexposed photos.

According to our factory sources, Apple have problems with the lens aperture for the next-gen iPod nano, the iris is not functioning correctly to allow the advantages of the low aperture to be utilized.
Interestingly, the report claims that the user interface for the camera features is finished and that Apple is looking to launch the device late this quarter or early next quarter once it finishes working out the camera issues.

The release would be a significant deviation from Apple's usual iPod refresh timeline, which has typically seen updates come in the September-October timeframe. But with Apple shaking up its schedules in 2011 by pushing the iPhone back from its usual June release to take the iPod's place with an October debut, it is possible that other changes to the usual timeline are in store.

The iPods saw only very minor changes last October, with the iPod touch essentially gaining only a white option and a price drop while the iPod nano saw a price drop and a software update that was also compatible with the previous year's model. The iPod shuffle and iPod classic received no updates at all, making Apple's 2011 iPod updates by far the most modest in the company's history. Consequently, Apple could be looking to make more substantial changes to its iPod line, such as the release of a camera-equipped iPod nano, well ahead of the fall 2012 timeframe.

Update: Refuting M.I.C gadget's claim that the iPod nano shown in the photos is a two-month old prototype, Apple.pro's Anthony Tsai posts this screenshot showing that the photos were in fact originally posted to the Internet in August 2011:



Related roundup: iPod nano

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

38 months ago
This is overboard. We don't need a camera on everything.
Rating: 13 Votes
38 months ago
Only question...why? Is this really expected to sell more Nanos? I think not.

Ditch the silly camera idea, and instead build in Bluetooth 4, make it connect to the iPhone in your pocket, and have it show notifications and talk to Siri.

THAT would make for a better Nano watch. Not a 1.3 mp bozo.
Rating: 8 Votes
38 months ago
I don't think the addition would be a bad thing, although I agree that it wouldn't be very exciting or useful. I could actually see them deviating from their normal iPod refresh timing, since it would seem as though the iPhone has taken over the September event (if last year is any indication of events moving forward).
Rating: 5 Votes
38 months ago
So let me get this straight....even the lowly ipod nano is gonna have a better camera than the ipod touch now? Boo! Lol.
Rating: 5 Votes
38 months ago
i think the gen 5 nano was perfect.
Rating: 5 Votes
38 months ago
I think they should do the following.

Drop the shuffle, slide the product line along, lower the price of the nano.

less supply constraints, more money.
Rating: 4 Votes
38 months ago

Apple's 1.3 MP Camera-Equipped iPod Nano Due for Launch in March/April?


this is an easy one.
magic 8-ball (which has a 1.6 MP camera, btw), says NO.
Rating: 3 Votes
38 months ago
I think they need to significantly drop the price of iPod nanos. The larger capacity models should be priced at or under $100, with the smaller capacity model coming in around $80.
Rating: 3 Votes
38 months ago
I agree with the majority - a camera is totally unnecessary and as a nano-watch user, it would serve me absolutely no purpose. If it was on the front, then maybe, but it would be very awkward and possibly tiring attempting to FaceTime on it. It certainly seems futuristic in a sense, but I don't think it's a good idea.

I personally would like to see:
- bluetooth (for bluetooth stereo headphones)
- a thinner and maybe slightly concave design (again, I wear it as a watch)
- Wi-Fi/3G (I'm a heavy Pandora user)
- and a longer battery to boot.
- Maybe some way to interface with an iPhone or iPad would be cool too... notifications right on your wrist.
- Maybe use the nano as a remote shutter release for an iPhone (like if you were taking a group picture and wanted to be in it or something)

Certainly a design challenge to include all the aforementioned (probably impossible with current technology), but it would be insanely awesome.
Rating: 3 Votes
38 months ago
Features Id like to see on the new nano are as follows:

1) Bluetooth.

2) Link to Iphone for call/message/email notifications. music control (for wired headphones off the iphone)/calendar remote etc / siri

3) remote ability for the apple TV/other devices (such as in the iphone remote app)

4) better battery

5) no camera.
Rating: 3 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]