M3 Ultra Chip is Only 10% Faster Than M4 Max in Benchmark Results - MacRumors
Skip to Content

M3 Ultra Chip is Only 10% Faster Than M4 Max in Benchmark Results

The first alleged benchmark result for Apple's new M3 Ultra chip has surfaced in the Geekbench 6 database tonight, allowing for more performance comparisons. The high-end chip is available in the new Mac Studio, introduced earlier this week.

M4 Max and M3 Ultra
Apple said the M3 Ultra chip is the "highest-performing chip it has ever created," and the unverified benchmark result seems to confirm that. In the single result, the 32-core M3 Ultra chip achieved a multi-core CPU score of 27,749, which makes it around 8% faster than the 16-core M4 Max chip that previously held the performance record. The result also reveals that the M3 Ultra chip is up to 30% faster than the 24-core M2 Ultra chip.

As expected, the M4 Max chip tops the M3 Ultra chip in terms of single-core CPU performance by nearly 20%, according to the result. This is due in part to the M4 Max chip being manufactured with TSMC's second-generation 3nm process, whereas the M3 Ultra is likely based on TSMC's first-generation 3nm process.

We now await additional M3 Ultra benchmark results to see if these scores are accurate, as they seem to be on the lower side compared to what was expected. For example, Apple advertised the M3 Ultra chip as being up to 1.5x faster than the M2 Ultra chip, so that 30% increase mentioned above should seemingly be closer to the 50% mark. Apple never said how the M3 Ultra chip's performance compares to the M4 Max chip, though.

As always, real-world performance may vary somewhat, but synthetic benchmark tools like Geekbench 6 provide a useful baseline for comparisons.

Watch this space, as we would not be surprised if additional Geekbench 6 results for the M3 Ultra chip end up having higher performance scores.

The benchmark was spotted by @jimmyjames_tech and shared by Vadim Yuryev.

Update: Three more M3 Ultra results have surfaced in the Geekbench 6 database, and the average multi-core CPU score has increased to 28,160. This means the M3 Ultra chip is around 10% faster than the M4 Max chip, up from the original 8% figure. Overall, it looks like the M3 Ultra chip is indeed not much faster than the M4 Max.

Related Roundup: Mac Studio
Buyer's Guide: Mac Studio (Buy Now)
Related Forum: Mac Studio

Popular Stories

Mac mini vs Studio Feature Sans Text 1

Apple Caught Off Guard by AI Demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

Sunday August 30, 2026 8:52 am PDT by
Apple's unusually timed announcement of new Mac mini and Mac Studio models this week was driven by unexpectedly strong enterprise appetite for AI hardware, according to The Information. Apple normally releases new Mac models in the autumn, closer to October or November, making this week's announcement unusually early, falling just before the anticipated arrival of new iPhone models. The...
Mac Studio Feature

Apple Seemingly Made a Mistake When Announcing the New Mac Studio

Monday August 31, 2026 11:19 am PDT by
Apple's press release for the new Mac Studio with M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips last week initially stated that the computer had "next-generation SSD architecture built on PCIe Gen 6." However, as spotted by the French blog MacGeneration, Apple removed the PCIe 6.0 mention from the announcement shortly after it was published. The press release still mentions that the new Mac Studio has a...
mac studio purple

New Mac Studio Can Be Clustered Together for Faster AI Performance

Wednesday August 26, 2026 5:56 am PDT by
Multiple new Mac Studio units can be clustered together over Thunderbolt 5 and RDMA (remote direct memory access), creating a shared memory pool for running larger AI models. If four Mac Studio systems are clustered together, Apple says they can deliver 3x faster AI inference than running the same task on a single system, with the shared memory pool helping to load the largest and most...

Top Rated Comments

EugW Avatar
20 months ago

1.5x means 150% faster, not 50%.
Apple's language use here is not accurate.

1.5X = 50% faster or 150% as fast, but not 150% faster.
2.5X = 150% faster.
Score: 55 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 months ago

1.5x means 150% faster, not 50%.
By that math 1x faster (ie. the same speed) would be 100% faster. Am I missing something?
Score: 30 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 months ago

By that math 1x faster (ie. the same speed) would be 100% faster. Am I missing something?
It is a linguistic ambiguity issue. If someone said "1.5x as fast" it is definitely a 150% multiplier, so "50% faster". But the article above chose to say the "x" multiplier and "faster" in the same sentence.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
nathansz Avatar
20 months ago
I thought the point was more gpu cores?
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 months ago
Yeah, this is why I ended up selling the M1 Ultra and then the M2 Ultra, and I won't be buying any more Ultras. The next gen Max chip kept coming out soon after. So really this comes down to if you need more memory, higher memory bandwidth or more GPU cores. Software engineers should just stick with the M4 Max unless they have a specific use case for the extra AI prowess.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 months ago
Some explaining is needed for $4k starting price.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)