Skip to Content

Apple Intelligence Not Trained on YouTube Content, Says Apple

Apple on Thursday addressed concerns about its use of AI training data, following an investigation that revealed Apple, along with other major tech companies, had used YouTube subtitles to train their artificial intelligence models.

Apple Intelligence General Feature
The investigation by Wired earlier this week reported that over 170,000 videos from popular content creators were part of a dataset used to train AI models. Apple specifically used this dataset in the development of its open-source OpenELM models, which were made public in April.

However, Apple has now confirmed to 9to5Mac that OpenELM does not power any of its AI or machine learning features, including the company's Apple Intelligence system. Apple clarified that OpenELM was created solely for research purposes, with the aim of advancing open-source large language model development.

On releasing OpenELM on the Hugging Face Hub, a community for sharing AI code, Apple researchers described it as a "state-of-the-art open language model" that had been designed to "empower and enrich the open research community." The model is also available through Apple's Machine Learning Research website. Apple has stated that it has no plans to develop new versions of the OpenELM model.

The company emphasized that since OpenELM is not integrated into ‌Apple Intelligence‌, the "YouTube Subtitles" dataset is not being used to power any of its commercial AI features. Apple reiterated its previous statement that ‌Apple Intelligence‌ models are trained on "licensed data, including data selected to enhance specific features, as well as publicly available data collected by our web-crawler."

The Wired report detailed how companies including Apple, Anthropic, and NVIDIA had used the "YouTube Subtitles" dataset for AI model training. This dataset is part of a larger collection known as "The Pile," which is compiled by the non-profit organization EleutherAI.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...

Top Rated Comments

sniffies Avatar
21 months ago
Thank god for that. Training on YouTube videos from popular content creators would render Apple Intelligence pretty unintelligent.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Havalo Avatar
21 months ago
Never believe anything until it’s been officially denied - Sir Humphrey (Yes, Minister)
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
21 months ago

Like a person, it could have been exposed to anything out in the wild and we don’t walk around with a list of references. But we treat this software differently to people… you wouldn’t let anyone off the street on your iPhone or laptop… similar goes for AI.
I think you're humanizing the AI too much. It's not a person searching knowledge "in the wild". It is a large file that has been created by a training algorithm which is given a lot of crawled data as the input. It doesn't learn anything outside of what its creators are passing along. And crucially, once training is complete, it's no longer acquiring knowledge. (Every interaction you have with it starts with a blank slate or explicit "context" given from your previous sessions/personal data.)

So the model's creators know absolutely what has been used to train it. They're generally just cagey about it, because they don't want to be sued once they admit whose copyrighted content they've used.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
peneaux Avatar
21 months ago

Thank god for that. Training on YouTube videos from popular content creators would render Apple Intelligence very unintelligent.
Unintelligent is a very polite way of saying garbage.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
21 months ago
How do we truly know what they have been trained on?

Like a person, it could have been exposed to anything out in the wild and we don’t walk around with a list of references. But we treat this software differently to people… you wouldn’t let anyone off the street on your iPhone or laptop… similar goes for AI.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
antiprotest Avatar
21 months ago
I believe Apple on this, because from all that we have heard this thing is going to be so delayed that at this point it hasn't been trained on ANY content.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)