Apple Appeals Epic Games Ruling Over 'Anti-Steering' Provisions to U.S. Supreme Court

by

Just a day after Epic Games appealed one portion of its legal dispute with Apple to the U.S. Supreme Court, Apple has now done the same for the portion that was ruled in Epic's favor, reports Bloomberg.

app store blue banner epic 1
The dispute between Apple and Epic dates back to 2020 with Epic seeking to overturn Apple's App Store rules requiring content purchases within iOS apps to go through Apple, which takes a 15% to 30% cut of the revenue.

In multiple rounds of the dispute, Apple has won on every count with the exception of one regarding Apple's "anti-steering" rule that bars developers of many iOS apps from directing users to methods of purchase available outside of the ‌App Store‌, circumventing Apple's revenue cut.

Apple had said it was considering appealing the ruling over its anti-steering provision to the Supreme Court, and back in July a judge ruled that Apple did not have to make changes to its policies pending the potential appeal, which has now been filed.

The Supreme Court will decide in the coming months whether it will hear either or both of Epic's and Apple's appeals, but if it does not take up either petition, the previous rulings will stand. Apple would be able to continue to disallow third-party payment processing within apps but would have to allow developers to inform users about other purchasing options outside of the ‌App Store‌.

Tags: Epic Games, Epic Games vs. Apple Guide

Popular Stories

m5 macbook pro deal

Why You Shouldn't Buy the Next MacBook Pro

Tuesday February 10, 2026 4:27 pm PST by
Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models as soon as early March, but if you can, this is one generation you should skip because there's something much better in the works. We're waiting on 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, with few changes other than the processor upgrade. There won't be any tweaks to the design or the display, but later this...
Read Full Article • 239 comments
iOS 26

Apple Releases iOS 26.3 and iPadOS 26.3

Wednesday February 11, 2026 10:07 am PST by
Apple today released iOS 26.3 and iPadOS 26.3, the latest updates to the iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 operating systems that came out in September. The new software comes almost two months after Apple released iOS 26.2 and iPadOS 26.2. The new software can be downloaded on eligible iPhones and iPads over-the-air by going to Settings > General > Software Update. According to Apple's release notes, ...
Read Full Article • 87 comments
Apple Logo Zoomed

Apple Expected to Launch These 10+ Products Over the Coming Months

Tuesday February 10, 2026 6:33 am PST by
It has been a slow start to 2026 for Apple product launches, with only a new AirTag and a special Apple Watch band released so far. We are still waiting for MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the iPhone 17e, a lower-cost MacBook with an iPhone chip, long-rumored updates to the Apple TV and HomePod mini, and much more. Apple is expected to release/update the following products...
Read Full Article • 40 comments
iPhone 16e Bottom Crop

Apple Reportedly Unveiling a New iPhone Next Week

Tuesday February 10, 2026 1:51 pm PST by
Apple plans to announce the iPhone 17e on Thursday, February 19, according to Macwelt, the German equivalent of Macworld. The report said the iPhone 17e will be announced in a press release on the Apple Newsroom website, so do not expect an event for this device specifically. The iPhone 17e will be a spec-bumped successor to the iPhone 16e. Rumors claim the device will have four key...
Read Full Article
Apple Logo Black

Apple Acquires New Database App

Wednesday February 11, 2026 6:44 am PST by
Apple acquired Canadian graph database company Kuzu last year, it has emerged. The acquisition, spotted by AppleInsider, was completed in October 2025 for an undisclosed sum. The company's website was subsequently taken down and its Github repository was archived, as is commonplace for Apple acquisitions. Kuzu was "an embedded graph database built for query speed, scalability, and easy of ...
Read Full Article • 32 comments

Top Rated Comments

erikkfi Avatar
erikkfi
31 months ago
I hope my preferred, soulless giant corporation prevails in this fight over the other side's preferred, soulless giant corporation.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
J
JimmyHook
31 months ago

I hope Epic wins this in the end. I'm not an Epic fan at all, but Apple is way too big to behave they way it behaves and is definitely stifling competition and innovation at this point.

Taking a 30% cut of every mobile platform transaction when you're one out of two mobile platforms, the other of which is doing the exact same thing, is outrageous.

Google and Apple are enjoying a pseudo-competitive situation, in reality there's no competition and it's an implicit cartel. A duopoly is not a competitive situation, there is absolutely zero pricing pressure on either company because they both know they are the only two platforms available and too big and established for anybody else to have a chance to enter the ring.

I really don't understand why everybody is rooting for Apple so badly on this topic, it's a classical case of consumers rooting against their own interests.
You also just described the video game console market. And several other existing markets. Generally, if you develop a platform, you own the rules.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sw1tcher Avatar
sw1tcher
31 months ago

I really don't understand why everybody is rooting for Apple so badly on this topic, it's a classical case of consumers rooting against their own interests.
1) Apple is never in the wrong. Ever.
2) Defend Apple no matter what.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
O
omihek
31 months ago
It would be hilarious if the Supreme Court decided to hear only Apple's appeal and not Epic's
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
A
alexe
31 months ago
I hope Epic wins this in the end. I'm not an Epic fan at all, but Apple is way too big to behave the way it behaves and is definitely stifling competition and innovation at this point.

Taking a 30% cut of every mobile platform transaction when you're one out of two mobile platforms, the other of which is doing the exact same thing, is outrageous.

Google and Apple are enjoying a pseudo-competitive situation, in reality there's no competition and it's an implicit cartel. A duopoly is not a competitive situation, there is absolutely zero pricing pressure on either company because they both know they are the only two platforms available and too big and established for anybody else to have a chance to enter the ring.

I really don't understand why everybody is rooting for Apple so badly on this topic, it's a classical case of consumers rooting against their own interests.

You do realize it's you, the consumer, who ends up paying those 30% extra, right? It's not Epic or Spotify or any other company. It's the consumer for whom things are more expensive, only for the most valuable company in the world to become even richer.

Whether or not you like Epic is beside the point. You can still hate Epic, and of course they are fighting this fight for selfish reasons, but they just happen to be the only ones stepping up to challenge Apple to adopt more consumer-friendly App Store practices, so we should all be thankful for that.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
GMShadow Avatar
GMShadow
31 months ago

I hope Epic wins this in the end. I'm not an Epic fan at all, but Apple is way too big to behave the way it behaves and is definitely stifling competition and innovation at this point.

Taking a 30% cut of every mobile platform transaction when you're one out of two mobile platforms, the other of which is doing the exact same thing, is outrageous.

Google and Apple are enjoying a pseudo-competitive situation, in reality there's no competition and it's an implicit cartel. A duopoly is not a competitive situation, there is absolutely zero pricing pressure on either company because they both know they are the only two platforms available and too big and established for anybody else to have a chance to enter the ring.

I really don't understand why everybody is rooting for Apple so badly on this topic, it's a classical case of consumers rooting against their own interests.

You do realize it's you, the consumer, who ends up paying those 30% extra, right? It's not Epic or Spotify or any other company. It's the consumer for whom things are more expensive, only for the most valuable company in the world to become even richer.

Whether or not you like Epic is beside the point. You can still hate Epic, and of course they are fighting this fight for selfish reasons, but they just happen to be the only ones stepping up to challenge Apple to adopt more consumer-friendly App Store practices, so we should all be thankful for that.
Do you actually believe that prices would drop by 30% if the fee were eliminated?

Do you believe stores should be forced to sell products for free?
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments