Apple Developers Required to Justify Use of Some APIs in Latest Move to Boost Privacy - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Developers Required to Justify Use of Some APIs in Latest Move to Boost Privacy

In an effort to bolster user privacy, developers will need to justify their use of certain Apple APIs before their apps can be listed on the App Store, according to a new article on the Apple developer website spotted by 9to5Mac.

iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated
The Apple Developer website now lists some APIs as "Required Reason APIs," meaning that developers have to clarify why they are using them in their privacy manifest. Some commonly used APIs, such as UserDefaults, which stores user preferences, now fall under the Required Reason category.

With the launch of watchOS 10, iOS 17, iPadOS 17, tvOS 17, and macOS Sonoma later this year, developers will receive a warning if they submit apps using a Required Reason API without specifying its usage. From spring 2024, any apps using these APIs without a legitimate justification will be rejected in the review process.

Apple explains that main reason for this change is to curb fingerprinting, a method used to track users across different apps and websites. Fingerprinting uses API calls to gather details about a user's device, such as screen resolution, model, and operating system. This data is then used to create a unique "fingerprint," enabling the user to be identified across various apps or websites.

According to Apple, Required Reason APIs will guarantee that apps only employ these APIs for their prescribed use. In the event of a rejection, Apple will permit developers to contest the decision and submit a request for approval if their case does not fit within the existing guidelines. See the Apple Developer website for more information.

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.5 Features: Everything New in iOS 26.5

Monday May 11, 2026 5:09 pm PDT by
Apple released iOS 26.5 after a few months of beta testing, and while it doesn't have the Siri features we were hoping for since those are being held until iOS 27, there are a handful of useful changes worth knowing about. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. End-to-End Encryption for RCS Support for end-to-end encryption (E2EE) for RCS messages between iPhone and...
Dynamic Island iPhone 18 Pro Feature

11 Reasons to Wait for the iPhone 18 Pro

Monday May 11, 2026 9:01 am PDT by
We're only four months out from the launch of Apple's premium next-generation smartphone lineup, and while we're not expecting a sea change in terms of functionality, there are still several enhancements rumored to be coming to the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. One thing worth noting is that Apple is reportedly planning a major change to its iPhone release cycle this year, adopting a...
Four iPhone 18 Pro Colors Mock Feature

iPhone 18 Pro May Have 'Aggressive' Starting Price Despite RAM Crisis

Tuesday May 12, 2026 6:53 am PDT by
While the ongoing RAM chip shortage is leading some Android smartphone makers to increase prices, one analyst believes that Apple will take advantage of the situation with the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. In a research note with GF Securities today, analyst Jeff Pu said he expects Apple to outperform in the smartphone market by having an "aggressive pricing strategy" for the ...

Top Rated Comments

fatTribble Avatar
37 months ago
I applaud efforts like these from Apple. Anything to enhance privacy for end users is a win in my book. 🤓🥰👏
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
37 months ago

As a developer I can't tell you how much of a pain this is going to be.
As a developer I don't see this being much of a hindrance. I already justify my code by writing comments.

I can't really see someone thinking "Wait, I have to justify my code? That's outrageous!"
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
37 months ago

As a developer I don't see this being much of a hindrance. I already justify my code by writing comments.

I can't really see someone thinking "Wait, I have to justify my code? That's outrageous!"
I like your attitude towards it, instead of “oh it’s going to be a pain” which gives me little faith in a developer to protect my privacy because it’s too inconvenient for them
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Zc456 Avatar
37 months ago
I can already hear Zuck yelling in frustration from within Facebook HQ.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
fatTribble Avatar
37 months ago

Good for privacy reason, however how much apps will slip through QC and checks? Many stories how fraudulent apps slipped through. The Apple App Store was once the example of quality apps compared to it's Android counterpart. Now it just feels like Android Junk.
Any gaps in QC can be improved over time. Because they potentially don’t catch everything doesn’t mean they should just give up.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
VulchR Avatar
37 months ago
Actually, as a consumer I want companies collecting as little information as possible about me. Indeed, I think they should pay for the privilege of collecting my personal information. I'd like the same to apply for web sites, but I recognise I am in a minority with this view.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)