Skip to Content

AnandTech's Deep Dive Into M1 Pro and M1 Max Highlights Performance and Efficiency Improvements

We've heard Apple's overview of the the M1 Pro and M1 Max Apple silicon chips and we've seen benchmarks of the CPU and GPUs, but AnandTech has done a technical deep dive into the capabilities of the new chips that's well worth reading for those who are interested in learning more.

m1 pro vs max feature
According to AnandTech, the ‌M1 Pro‌ is a new implementation of the M1 chip, but designed "from the ground up" to offer more performance. AnandTech says that this is the more interesting of the two chip designs because it offers "mostly everything that power users will deem generationally important in terms of upgrades."

The CPU cores clock up to 3228MHz peak, however vary in frequency depending on how many cores are active within a cluster, clocking down to 3132 at 2, and 3036 MHz at 3 and 4 cores active. I say "per cluster", because the 8 performance cores in the M1 Pro and M1 Max are indeed consisting of two 4-core clusters, both with their own 12MB L2 caches, and each being able to clock their CPUs independently from each other, so it's actually possible to have four active cores in one cluster at 3036MHz and one active core in the other cluster running at 3.23GHz.

The higher-end ‌M1 Max‌ is identical to the ‌M1 Pro‌, with the exception of the GPU and the media encoders.

The GPU and memory interfaces of the chip are by far the most differentiated aspects of the chip, instead of a 16-core GPU, Apple doubles things up to a 32-core unit. On the M1 Max which we tested for today, the GPU is running at up to 1296MHz - quite fast for what we consider mobile IP, but still significantly slower than what we've seen from the conventional PC and console space where GPUs now can run up to around 2.5GHz.

AnandTech's ‌M1 Pro‌ and ‌M1 Max‌ overview goes into much more depth about the unified memory, the power behavior, and CPU and GPU performance. All in all, AnandTech says that these new chips "truly feel like SoCs that have been made with power users in mind," and performance metrics have been boosted "in all vectors."

The chips here aren't only able to outclass any competitor laptop design, but also competes against the best desktop systems out there, you'd have to bring out server-class hardware to get ahead of the M1 Max – it's just generally absurd.

The site was expecting significant boosts in performance, but "didn't expect some of the monstrous increases that the new chips are able to achieve." The chips outclass any competing laptop design, and also rival the best desktop systems available.

Related Roundup: MacBook Pro
Buyer's Guide: MacBook Pro (Buy Now)
Related Forum: MacBook Pro

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...

Top Rated Comments

sniffies Avatar
57 months ago
Top notch performance guaranteed
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
57 months ago
I always enjoy reading all the comments when Apple releases new hardware, but this time I have to post a grumpy old man response.

Apple have released a laptop that can run circles around many desktop systems at both a lower cost and using a lot less power. You can throw into your backpack what you earlier had to put in your trunk and Apple have even added ports for what you should not care about or already have dongles for.

Stop whining about your HDMI port not being 2.1 or a notch that you won’t notice after a few days of work.
And no, it’s not a gaming console, so get an Xbox or a PlayStation.

I am a developer and jumped on the first generation M1 and as much as I would like a new MacBook Pro I simply cannot justify it since no matter what I throw at what I have now, it just keeps asking for more.

What is it you want from Apple? Do you know yourselves?
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
57 months ago

The memory advancements are really cool. But the graphics performance in games is kind of disappointing. I don't think they really talked about GPU compute either? On the whole, great SoCs, but I feel like M1 was more impressive overall, especially in power efficiency.
I think the issue with games is that there aren't very many optimized for Apple Silicon, either the CPU or Metal.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
57 months ago
Gamers are fickle and toxic; frankly they aren't a good demographic to hang your company's success upon. If you can get them onboard, great, but they come and go all too easily.

Historically Apple linked itself to education and now to media creators.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Michael Scrip Avatar
57 months ago

I always see a lot of talk about gaming on a Mac but are people really ok with spending $6,100 on a maxed out laptop just to play games?
No one is buying a $6,100 laptop just to play games.

But some people would like to also play games on their laptop... rather than spending thousands on a separate gaming PC.

Or they could just get a $500 console.

(note that decent GPUs and consoles are very hard to find and/or scalpers have ruined the market... so gaming on their laptop might be all they can do...)
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️ Avatar
57 months ago
Very impressed by the performance. Best review so far.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)