Apple's Planned App Store Changes Will Barely Affect the Company's Bottom Line, Says Analyst

As a result of legal and regulatory pressures, Apple recently announced some upcoming changes to its App Store policies, such as letting developers email customers about payment options available outside of their iOS app and allowing "reader" apps like Spotify and Netflix to include an in-app link to their website for account signup.

app store vs developers
Apple said the changes "will help make the App Store an even better business opportunity for developers," but Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty believes there will be "minimal financial impact" to Apple. In a research note, she said the changes would result in just a 1-2% hit to Apple's earnings per share in the 2022 fiscal year in a worst case scenario.

For example, while "reader" apps will be able to provide a single link to their website to help users set up and manage their account, which could result in more customers subscribing to an app directly instead of through Apple's in-app purchase system, Huberty notes that Spotify and Netflix already disabled the ability for new users to subscribe to their services through Apple's in-app purchase system since 2016 and 2018 respectively, meaning Apple hasn't collected a commission on new subscriptions to either app for at least three years.

Huberty added that App Store revenue from the top 10 "reader" apps accounts for less than 8% of overall App Store revenue, suggesting the financial risk to Apple from these developers circumventing the in-app purchase system is "fairly small."

"We view the top 10 or so apps as those that are most likely to have the scale, brand, marketing budget, and customer loyalty to absorb the friction of circumventing the App Store payments platform," she wrote. "Assuming a worst case scenario in which Apple stopped collecting economics from all of the top 20 reader apps translates to downside risk of 4% of Services revenue, 1% of total company revenue, and about 2% of FY22 EPS forecast."

"In other words, we believe the recent App Store headlines are more attention grabbing than the ultimate financial impact to Apple's revenue or profitability," she concluded.

Huberty believes Apple has no intention to bring these changes to gaming apps either, despite having faced a lawsuit from Fortnite maker Epic Games, which accused Apple of having a monopoly over the sale of apps and in-app purchases through the App Store. A decision in that lawsuit is expected to be announced soon.

Popular Stories

iPhone 16 Pro Max Generic Feature 2

5 Biggest Changes Rumored for iPhone 16 Pro Max

Tuesday May 21, 2024 7:29 am PDT by
Given Apple's rumored plan to add an all-new high-end tier to its iPhone 17 series in 2025, this could be the year for Apple to bring its boldest "Pro Max" model to the table — the kind of iPhone 16 upgrade that stands tall above its siblings, both figuratively and literally. If you have been holding out for the iPhone 16 Pro Max, here are five of the biggest changes rumored to be coming...
iOS 17

Apple Releases iOS 17.5.1 With Fix for Reappearing Photos Bug

Monday May 20, 2024 10:11 am PDT by
Apple today released iOS 17.5.1 and iPadOS 17.5.1, minor updates to the iOS 17 and iPadOS 17 operating system updates that came out last September. The 17.5.1 updates come a week after the launch of iOS 17.5 and iPadOS 17.5. iOS 17.5.1 and iPadOS 17.5.1 can be downloaded on eligible iPhones and iPads over-the-air by going to Settings > General > Software Update. According to Apple's...
maxresdefault

iPhone SE 4 With Face ID Said to Be Priced Below $500

Monday May 20, 2024 3:43 am PDT by
Apple is targeting a sub-$500 starting price for its upcoming fourth-generation iPhone SE model despite a raft of rumored upgrades coming to the more affordable device. According to leaker Revegnus on X, the U.S. launch price of the fourth-generation iPhone SE will either remain at the same $429 starting price as the current model, or will see an increase of around 10%. Either way, Apple's...
microsoft surface pro qualcomm

Microsoft Says New Surface Pro is Faster Than 15" M3 MacBook Air

Monday May 20, 2024 3:19 pm PDT by
Microsoft is going all in on AI, today introducing a series of Copilot+ PCs that have AI-focused hardware. The new Surface Pro is one of the first Copilot+ PCs, equipped with Qualcomm's Arm-based Snapdragon X Elite processor. Microsoft is already pitting the Surface Pro against Apple's M3 MacBook Air, and in marketing materials, claims that the Surface Pro has superior processing power and...
iPhone 15 Pro Cameras

iPhone 16 Pro Max to Feature New 48MP Wide and Ultra Wide Cameras

Tuesday May 21, 2024 3:36 am PDT by
Apple's iPhone 16 Pro Max will boast a bigger main camera sensor while both iPhone 16 Pro models will feature a 48-megapixel Ultra Wide camera for the first time, claims a rumor coming out of Asia. According to Weibo user OvO Baby Sauce OvO, the main camera of the iPhone 16 Pro Max will be based on an advanced custom 48-megapixel Sony IMX903 sensor. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro will use...

Top Rated Comments

Wildkraut Avatar
35 months ago

Those poor devs Making tens of millions
Poor Apple making trillions
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Infinite Vortex Avatar
35 months ago

Apple said the changes "will help make the App Store an even better business opportunity for developers,"
That's all well and good to say that now but the number of times they've been in court to prevent it along with all of their long standing "justifications" to never have offered it without a court order makes Apple's statement ring a little bit hollow.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
dguisinger Avatar
35 months ago

How should Apple charge for access to the Xcode developer's tool and the Apple App Store if not thru a commission on sales? Or recognizing that, within the product's sale space, there is a monopoly so Congress should pass a law setting all online commission rates the same. This would include Google and XBox etc.
How could Apple charge for Xcode, a tool it needs internally to build its own operating system, that ships on its massively successful and profitable iPhone which would die off if there were no 3rd party apps-for-that. How could Tim Cook ever possibly afford to eat without double-dipping on recouping costs?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
PC_tech Avatar
35 months ago

How should Apple charge for access to the Xcode developer's tool and the Apple App Store if not thru a commission on sales? Or recognizing that, within the product's sale space, there is a monopoly so Congress should pass a law setting all online commission rates the same. This would include Google and XBox etc.
Isn’t that what the 99 people pay them a year is for?
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Wildkraut Avatar
35 months ago

I have to say, as someone who's used Visual Studio for 20 years.... the few times I've tried to use Xcode, .... I HATE XCode. The IDE just doesn't behave the way I expect an IDE to behave.
Same here, I use it because there is no 100% way around it "yet".
It should be called Xpuzzler and not Xcode, good for noobs but bad for coders.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Wildkraut Avatar
35 months ago

oh, another example why we need to spend way more money on basic education. No company ever has made a trillion dollars, probably not even cumulatively. that is a really big number, like it is a 1000 billions, which is 1000 millions, which is a 1000 thousands.
Just like not every dev makes tens of millions. :p
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)