Epic Games Denied Preliminary Injunction for Fortnite, But Apple Can't Block Unreal Engine - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Epic Games Denied Preliminary Injunction for Fortnite, But Apple Can't Block Unreal Engine

A California judge today denied Epic Games' request for a preliminary injunction that would have required Apple to allow Fortnite back into the App Store, which means the app will continue to remain unavailable on Apple's iOS platform for the duration of the legal battle between the two companies.

fortnite apple featured
While the Fortnite app for iOS devices will not be reinstated into the ‌App Store‌, Epic did successfully win an order that will require Apple to continue to allow Epic to operate its Unreal Engine developer account.

The decisions made today by the court are not a surprise and echo the ruling made during a request for a temporary restraining order, where the judge made the same determinations and allowed Apple to ban the Fortnite app but prevented the Cupertino company from blocking the Unreal Engine.

The court says that in regard to Fortnite, preliminary injunctive relief is "rarely granted," with the ruling pointing out that an order for injunctive relief would require Epic to establish that it is likely to succeed in the legal battle, it is likely to suffer irreparable harm without relief, the balance of equities tips in its favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest, none of which ‌Epic Games‌ was able to do.

‌Epic Games‌ has claimed that it should be given injunctive relief because it should not have to comply with an anti-competitive ‌App Store‌ contract, but the court has rejected this argument multiple times because ‌Epic Games‌ deliberately breached its contract with Apple and caused Fortnite to be banned.

Epic Games cannot simply exclaim "monopoly" to rewrite agreements giving itself unilateral benefit. Its other identified bases: damage to its reputation and the Fortnite gaming community cannot constitute irreparable harm where such harm flows from Epic Games' own actions and its strategic decision to breach its agreements with Apple. While consumers are feeling the impact of this litigation, the fact remains: these are business disputes.

To assist, the Court even offered to require the 30% to be placed in escrow pending resolution of the trial which Epic Games flatly rejected. The refusal to do so suggests Epic Games is not principally concerned with iOS consumers, but rather, harbors other tactical moves. Epic Games admits that the technology exists to "fix" the problem by easily deactivating the "hotfix."

Apple and ‌Epic Games‌ are not expected to be back in court to continue the legal dispute until May of 2021, so Fortnite fans will be without access to the game on Apple's devices for some time. Apple in August terminated the Fortnite developer account.

Update: In a statement provided to Bloomberg, Apple said that it's "grateful" to the court for the decision.

Our customers depend on the App Store being a safe and trusted place where all developers follow the same set of rules. We're grateful the court recognized that Epic's actions were not in the best interests of its own customers and that any problems they may have encountered were of their own making when they breached their agreement. For twelve years, the App Store has been an economic miracle, creating transformative business opportunities for developers large and small. We look forward to sharing this legacy of innovation and dynamism with the court next year.

Popular Stories

fortnite brazil

Fortnite Returns to iPhone in Brazil as Epic Games Store Launches

Thursday July 30, 2026 1:11 pm PDT by
Epic Games today said that the Epic Games Store can now be downloaded on iPhones in Brazil through the Epic Games website. In its announcement, Epic Games complained about the third-party store installation process, which requires nine steps and includes screens warning customers about downloading apps outside of the App Store. Apple is imposing a 9-step install flow for alternative app stores ...
app store blue banner epic 1

Apple Can't Delay App Store Fee Fight While Waiting on Supreme Court

Tuesday August 11, 2026 12:14 pm PDT by
Apple has again failed to earn a stay for fee calculations in its ongoing legal fight with Epic Games. Apple's case will be heard by the Supreme Court in the term that begins in October, and Apple asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to pause proceedings until then, but the court said no [PDF]. Apple now has 24 hours to give the court an outline of the fees...
app store blue banner epic 1

Supreme Court Lets Apple Delay App Store Fee Fight for 24 Hours

Wednesday August 12, 2026 4:21 pm PDT by
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan today granted Apple a one-day stay in its legal fight with Epic Games, giving Apple more time to outline the fees it wants to charge developers for linking out to purchase options on the web. Just yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied Apple's request for a stay in the proceedings, giving Apple 24 hours to...

Top Rated Comments

cmaier Avatar
77 months ago
Judge finding Epics‘ “credibility” “undermined.”

Attachment Image
Score: 56 Votes (Like | Disagree)
springsup Avatar
77 months ago
World’s smallest violin for Epic 🎻
Score: 46 Votes (Like | Disagree)
77 months ago
"Epic Games' adamant refusal to understand this basic distinction is not only baffling, but undermines its credibility with this Court."

I can't stop laughing at this. It really does make them look silly.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cmaier Avatar
77 months ago

Correct. But the point is that arguing that this is somehow rarely done, or is only done for serious bug fixes is nonsense. Server-gated changes are pretty common. This is doubly true if you're talking about a highly server-driven game.
I think you missed the point of the footnote. The import of it was not whether it is rarely done or not. Her point is that Epic claimed that Apple was fully aware of the nature of the change when they submitted the hotfix, which is clearly ludicrous. Epic keeps making the straw man argument “there’s nothing wrong with hotfixes!”

And her point is that ”yep, that’s true. the issue isn’t that you made a hot fix. It’s that you hid the functionality enabled by that hot fix, and you know that’s the real issue Epic.”
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gnasher729 Avatar
77 months ago
The judge's adamant refusal to understand how flag-guarded features work or the difference between a hot patch (uploading new executable code to run on the device itself, which is almost completely infeasible in iOS) and changing server-side or server-gated client-side behavior is not only baffling, but undermines her credibility with the industry.
Your arrogance thinking you know better than the judge is astonishing. The whole reason for this “hotfix” was to give one version to apple’s review team, and then have a totally different version in the hands of the users, with a feature that Epic knew was in breach of their contract with Apple, and which Epic knew would never have passed an app review.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
77 months ago

Umm.. no. Gating new features behind flags so that they can be turned on after an app has been shipped to the user has been standard industry practice in the mobile space for a very long time — pretty much since the dawn of iOS development. I don't know any company out there that doesn't do that, precisely because fully testing a new feature perfectly is hard. So instead, they test it to the maximum extent possible, then turn it on for some subset of users, then eventually turn it on for all users.

The judge's adamant refusal to understand how flag-guarded features work or the difference between a hot patch (uploading new executable code to run on the device itself, which is almost completely infeasible in iOS) and changing server-side or server-gated client-side behavior is not only baffling, but undermines her credibility with the industry.
That’s not the issue. The issue is introducing a feature that violates their agreement with Apple. It’s pretty black and white.



Same. They were actually working on a new version of Unreal Tournament but then Fortnite ended up being so successful so they just stopped. :(

Oh well, UT99 is still awesome.
And I will forever hate them for this.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)