Apple Gains Footing in Court Feud With Former iPhone Chip Architect

A former Apple executive who worked on the chips that power iPhones and iPads has had a request to toss a breach-of-contract lawsuit brought by the company rejected by the court in a tentative ruling.


Last August, Apple sued its former A-series chip lead, Gerard Williams III, for breach of employment contract. Williams was the lead designer of Apple's custom ‌iPhone‌ and ‌iPad‌ chips from the A7 to A12X, before he departed the company in March 2019 to start his own chip company, Nuvia Inc, with two other former Apple chip executives.

Apple accuses him of breaching the contract because it barred him from planning or engaging in any business activities that are "competitive or directly related to Apple's business or products." Williams argues that a provision in the contract conflicts with a California law that allows workers to develop new businesses while they're employed elsewhere.

However, Bloomberg today reports that Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Mark Pierce said the law doesn't permit an employee "to plan and prepare to create a competitive enterprise prior to termination if the employee does so on their employer's time and with the employer's resources."

The judge also dismissed a claim by Williams that Apple invaded his privacy by reviewing text messages he wrote to coworkers that were critical of the company. In one of the messages, Williams is said to have claimed that Apple would have "no choice but to purchase" his new company.
Williams sought to have those texts excluded as evidence in the suit. Pierce disagreed. "There are no allegations in the complaint establishing that the text messages were obtained as the result of eavesdropping upon or recording a confidential communication," he wrote.
The judge sided with Williams in dismissing Apple's bid for punitive damages, saying the company has failed to show how Williams intentionally tried to harm Apple by being disloyal.

Bloomberg notes that the tentative ruling regarding the California law doesn't address the merits of Apple’s claims, but it will allow the company to proceed with pretrial information-sharing if the judge decides to make it final.

Claude Stern, Williams' lawyer, said he would contest the judge's findings at a hearing in San Jose on Tuesday. He argues that Williams can't be sued for simply coming up with a new business idea while working at Apple, as opposed to taking inventions he worked on that belong to his previous employer.

Tag: lawsuit

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

4 weeks ago
I feel like this dude could have just asked for a raise and avoided all this nonsense.
Rating: 13 Votes
4 weeks ago
This is an interesting case. Apple claims that Williams breached non-compete contract by starting his own company. But in fact Nuvia, Williams new company is building server chips which does not compete directly against any of Apple's products.

I guess Apple has to demonstrate in court that Nuvia completes directly against Apple, which means they have to show that they are building server chips for external consumption? Otherwise, I can't see how this case can stand.

Maybe there will be more details coming out.
Rating: 9 Votes
4 weeks ago
I am sure he was making a TON of money between his salary and stock options. Yet, that was not enough and he had to scheme to make even more via a startup that Apple would have to buy.
Rating: 8 Votes
4 weeks ago
Apple has always been bad with pay. These thoughts should NOT enter the mind of an employee, especially one as critical as your lead chip designer. Simply paying them 350k and throwing in a million in stock won't cut it. These guys are making you billions of dollars a quarter. wtf is Apple doing.
Rating: 7 Votes
4 weeks ago
I think it was more of an influence issue, Williams got shoved around too much and he knew that Johnny Ives started his own company and consults with Apple... Maybe he wanted to copy that strategy. Sounds like “Apple will have to buy us” was the real story.
Rating: 3 Votes
4 weeks ago
"if the employee does so on their employer's time and with the employer's resources" This is common sense, what was this guy thinking?!? Anything done on company property with company resources unless otherwise agreed, is under the sole ownership of said company. This is why I never take my work laptop home, so that I avoid mistakenly working on a personal project on company resources.
Rating: 3 Votes
4 weeks ago


I feel like this dude could have just asked for a raise and avoided all this nonsense.

My thoughts exactly. Wasn’t this guy making enough money? What a ridiculous scheme. And this is supposed to be a smart dude.
Rating: 2 Votes
4 weeks ago
From what I've read, the guy seems really arrogant. I mean I guess he has reason to be if he was responsible for the A7 to A12X, but you gotta check yourself before you wreck yourself!
Rating: 2 Votes
4 weeks ago


I think it was more of an influence issue, Williams got shoved around too much and he knew that Johnny Ives started his own company and consults with Apple... Maybe he wanted to copy that strategy. Sounds like “Apple will have to buy us” was the real story.


And trashing your main customer or potential buyer has never been a winning strategy. Bet that Ive was smart enough not to do that!
Rating: 2 Votes
4 weeks ago


How did Apple get access to the private text messages?


I imagine someone (perhaps still an Apple employee) who received the messages shared them with Apple. That seems like the most likely route.
Rating: 2 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]