Apple Found Not Responsible in Fatal Car Crash Involving Distracted Driver Using FaceTime - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Found Not Responsible in Fatal Car Crash Involving Distracted Driver Using FaceTime

Back in 2014, iPhone user Garrett Wilhelm was using FaceTime on his iPhone 6 Plus while driving, causing him to crash into the back of another vehicle.

The crash resulted in the death of five-year-old Moriah Modisette, and her father, James Modisette, launched a lawsuit in 2017 against Apple for not offering safety warnings or a feature that disables FaceTime while a person is driving.

facetime
The lawsuit contended that Apple had, at the time, patented technology that would have prevented FaceTime from being used while a vehicle is being operated, but had not installed it in the iPhone 6. The plaintiffs requested damages from Apple for its "wrongful failure to install and implement the safer, alternative design for which it sought a patent in December 2008."

"At the time of the collision in question, the iPhone utilized by Wilhelm contained the necessary hardware (to be configured with software) to automatically disable or 'lock out' the ability to use [FaceTime] ... However, Apple failed to configure the iPhone to automatically 'lock out' the ability to utilize FaceTime while driving at highway speeds, despite having the technical capability to do so."

The lawsuit against Apple was dismissed after a court decided that Apple was not at fault for the crash, and as of today, a California appeals court has agreed with that decision.

According to the BBC, the appeals court ruled Apple "did not owe the Modisettes a duty of care," and that it was not up to Apple to take responsibility for the actions of individuals using its apps. The family, said the court, could not establish that the design of the iPhone was the cause of the injuries suffered.

Garrett Wilhelm, the driver of the vehicle who killed the girl, was indicted on manslaughter charges. His trial has been delayed several times because the FHI has not yet been able to gather data from his iPhone, but if he is found guilty, he could serve up to 20 years in prison. Wilhelm is set to be tried before a jury on June 3, 2019.

While Apple was not found to be responsible for the crash, the Cupertino company has since implemented a Do Not Disturb While Driving feature designed to prevent iPhone users from accessing apps like FaceTime while operating a vehicle.


Do Not Disturb While Driving was implemented in iOS 11 and it is designed to block incoming messages and phone calls if a phone is not connected to a car via Bluetooth.

Popular Stories

OpenAI vs Apple Feature

OpenAI President on Apple Lawsuit: We Don't Need Your Secrets

Wednesday July 29, 2026 1:45 pm PDT by
OpenAI president Greg Brockman recently did an interview with Joanna Stern, where he commented on the lawsuit OpenAI is facing from Apple and talked about OpenAI's product plans. Brockman reiterated what OpenAI has already said on the record, stating that the company is "plenty innovative" and uninterested in other companies' trade secrets. I would say that we have no interest in other...
General iCloud App Feature

Apple's iCloud File Sharing Left Ex-Employees With Access to Secret Documents

Monday August 3, 2026 10:48 am PDT by
The way Apple combines work and personal iCloud accounts left some employees able to access confidential documents after departing the company, reports The Information. The site spoke to more than half a dozen former Apple employees who were unknowingly left with access to sensitive content. The former employees said many Apple files they had been shared on over their careers at the...
OpenAI vs Apple Feature

OpenAI Posts Public Rebuttal to Apple's Trade Secrets Lawsuit

Tuesday August 4, 2026 5:26 am PDT by
Apple has asked a federal judge for a preliminary injunction against OpenAI as its trade secrets lawsuit escalates, and OpenAI responded hours later with a detailed public rebuttal that includes internal messages and legal correspondence. Reuters reports that Apple yesterday filed a motion seeking to bar OpenAI and two former employees, Chang Liu and Tang Tan, from accessing, using, or...

Top Rated Comments

dannyyankou Avatar
100 months ago
Good, they shouldn't be held liable. What's next, holding HarperCollins liable for someone reading a book at the wheel?
Score: 63 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WannaGoMac Avatar
100 months ago
Amazing, I guess no one has common sense anymore.
Score: 47 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gugy Avatar
100 months ago
Personal responsibility.

It's lacking big time these days.
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
826317 Avatar
100 months ago
Imagine being so deluded that you feel suing a company, who's software was being used by a distracted person, was responsible for the distracted person being distracted.
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AngerDanger Avatar
100 months ago
Skype also offers no such safety warnings. YouTube doesn’t either. Analog portable TVs never came with a warning.

Why on earth would you need someone else to tell you that you can’t look at a video when you’re supposed to be looking elsewhere?!
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
yaxomoxay Avatar
100 months ago
Imagine losing your 5 year old child.
Awful, but that doesn't make suing Apple (in this case) better in any way whatsoever.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)