Security Researcher Shows How Remote macOS Exploit Hoodwinks Safari Users With Custom URL Schemes - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Security Researcher Shows How Remote macOS Exploit Hoodwinks Safari Users With Custom URL Schemes

by

A security researcher has demonstrated how macOS users are vulnerable to remote infection through a malicious exploit involving the "Do you want to allow..." popup that can be encountered when visiting websites in Safari.

In a lengthy breakdown, Patrick Wardle explains how the exploit utilizes document handlers, which request permission to open a link or a file in another app – like a PDF in Preview, for example – and URL handlers, which work similarly in the way they notify macOS that they can accept certain file formats.

malicious attack safari
The exploit occurs when a user visits a malicious website and a ZIP file is downloaded and automatically unzipped by Safari, whereby the custom URL scheme is initially registered on the user's filesystem.

Once the target visits our malicious website, we trigger the download of an archive (.zip) file that contains our malicious application. If the Mac user is using Safari, the archive will be automatically unzipped, as Apple thinks it's wise to automatically open "safe" files. This fact is paramount, as it means the malicious application (vs. just a compressed zip archive) will now be on the user's filesystem, which will trigger the registration of any custom URL scheme handlers! Thanks Apple!

In the next stage, the malicious web page runs code that can load or "browse" to the custom URL scheme, which causes macOS to activate the URL handler and launch the malicious application.

This action is enabled through the Safari user prompt that includes options to "Allow" or "Cancel" the process, however the popup text and available options are controlled by the attacker, and are therefore easily changed to trick or deceive the user.

malicious exploit safari
The standard defenses built into macOS – Gatekeeper, for example – are said to be ineffective when it comes to the attack described above, and while Apple could always revoke the malicious app's signature, that course of action would obviously be too late for anyone who had already gone ahead and launched it.

Until then, turning off automatic unzipping of "safe" files should be enough to prevent the malicious procedure from ever occurring. Concerned users can do so by clicking the Safari menu bar, selecting Preferences..., and under the General tab, unchecking Open "safe" files after downloading.

Top Rated Comments

Kebabselector Avatar
102 months ago
Until then, turning off automatic unzipping of "safe" files should be enough to prevent the malicious procedure from ever occurring. Concerned users can do so by clicking the Safari menu bar, selecting Preferences..., and under the General tab, unchecking Open "safe" files after downloading.
Surely this should be the default position for any user regardless of the exploit or not.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
102 months ago
There have been a few previous security vulnerabilities relating to Safari on the Mac, where allowing Safari to open 'safe' files was the entry vector.

Ever since the first such vulnerability, it's been my opinion that the safest approach is to simply leave that option turned off permanently. Particularly as it doesn't really add much convenience. I very rarely want to open a file as soon as it's been downloaded. Also, opening a file manually involves two clicks at the very most.

Anyway, I feel this is one instance where security outweighs convenience by a very wide margin.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Porco Avatar
102 months ago
I have always turned this option off for any mac I worked with. It should never have been a thing, and certainly never the default.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
twistedpixel8 Avatar
102 months ago
Surely this should be the default position for any user regardless of the exploit or not.
It shouldn’t even be a feature. How lazy do you have to be if you can’t double click an archive?!
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Justanotherfanboy Avatar
102 months ago
His snarky “thanks Apple!” comment seemed a bit unprofessional for a security researcher.
Surely he must be aware that all tech companies don’t try to have security holes... & if none existed whatsoever, he’d be out of a job.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MrGimper Avatar
102 months ago
I only came here to doff my cap for the use of the word "hoodwinks"
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

Apple TV Thumb 3

Everything Coming in the 2026 Apple TV 4K

Wednesday July 8, 2026 4:51 pm PDT by
The Apple TV 4K hasn't been updated since 2022, and it's due for a refresh. An update is planned for 2026, but Apple is likely going to wait to launch it after Siri AI launches in iOS 27. Design Apple TV design updates don't happen often, and that's not changing. The next Apple TV is going to have the same squircle shape as the current model, and it'll continue to be made from a black...
iphone 16 teal

'Siri AI' Lawsuit Update: Apple to Pay Owners of These iPhone Models

Thursday July 9, 2026 7:08 am PDT by
In May, Apple agreed to pay $250 million to settle a U.S. class action lawsuit over Siri AI's delayed launch, and eligible iPhone users could receive up to a $95 payout. This week, the California court overseeing the case held a hearing regarding preliminary approval of the settlement, but the judge has not yet issued a ruling. It will likely be at least a few more months before eligible...
iCloud iPhone 17 Pro

Apple Says These iOS 27 Features Require $9.99/Month Subscription

Wednesday July 8, 2026 6:24 am PDT by
iOS 27 includes new Apple Intelligence features for compatible cameras in Apple's Home app, but only if you have an iCloud+ plan with at least 2TB of storage. This limitation effectively means that the new features are only available with a minimum $9.99/month subscription, even though the centerpiece of the subscription is the 2TB of storage. The features include AI descriptions for...