Apple Used Bluetooth Low Energy Audio for Cochlear Implant iPhone Accessory

Tech used to improve lives. That is always a good thing.

There still is a device that goes on the ear with a battery.

Although the battery is outside, the goal of the BLEA technology is to reduce the load placed on the battery. Less load, less need to recharge frequently. If a regular BT load causes you to charge the hearing aid 2, 3, 4x (just guesses here) more than a hearing aid without BT, it's a less effective device.

Although the battery is outside, the goal of the BLEA technology is to reduce the load placed on the battery. Less load, less need to recharge frequently. If a regular BT load causes you to charge the hearing aid 2, 3, 4x (just guesses here) more than a hearing aid without BT, it's a less effective device.

agreed. I wasn’t trying to play down the achievement. Was just trying to clarify as I think the article summary in it’s current form might slightly mislead some people.

BLEA was basically a "hack" on BLE they created in 2015 when they worked with Resound on the first made-for-iPhone hearing aids. normal bluetooth streaming was too power hungry. This is just the same thing applied to implants, not a new breakthrough per se. Does make big difference for patients though.

If a regular BT load causes you to charge the hearing aid 2, 3, 4x (just guesses here) more than a hearing aid without BT, it's a less effective device.

- this is a cochlear implant, not a hearing aid
- most hearing aids still have replaceable batteries (last for a week~)

Although the battery is outside, the goal of the BLEA technology is to reduce the load placed on the battery. Less load, less need to recharge frequently. If a regular BT load causes you to charge the hearing aid 2, 3, 4x (just guesses here) more than a hearing aid without BT, it's a less effective device.

I use a digital BTE ( behind the ear ) hearing aid and the battery is easily accessible that way, lasting about a week or two . Most Cochlear implants are set up similarly to what's mentioned in the article although without bluetooth. You just control the volume or hearing modes ( programmed by the audiologist ) on the hearing aid.

I would never use a cochlear implant since they cost an arm and a leg, requiring intense speech therapy all over again and a re-adjustment phase. I'm old school and liked the analog hearing aids better due to the rich sonorous sound uncompressed. The digital one I have is pretty good but the way you listen to music with it sounds different than analog. Most of the music had dropped bass on certain parts of the track that didn't sound normal, so I had to get my audiologist to remove the compression so that it sounds better with my open-air Sennheiser headphones with standard headphone jack ( one reason why I'm not a fan of the Air Pod design ).

If I wanted to make a video call on Skype, for example, I have to use a special headset that sits next to my hearing aid tethered with a 3.5 jack wire to the phone or iPad. That way the headset uses t-coil mode, blocking the entire background in total silence while I can only hear the person or the music. That headset has no need to be recharged.

I'm aware of a bluetooth hearing aid that Apple partnered up with another company that uses the iPhone to control it, but I'm skeptical about the idea behind it. If the phone gets lost, the person is not going to be able to manipulate the hearing aid's control settings.

And lastly, cochlear implants are a big issue with the deaf community as many refuse to touch it, preferring to stay with hearing aids or none. I don't use sign language but the majority of those I've met are extremely fluent with it.

I thought the part that had the battery was outside the ear and could easily be replaced or charged?

I wear digital aids too but mine are part of the Made for iPhone hearing aid program (https://www.apple.com/accessibility/iphone/hearing/). There are also older Cochlear devices in that program, this is just the first to use BTLE. The batteries on mine last around 5 days, it would easily be nearly two weeks if not for streaming (I stream literally all day with a device connected to my computer for work, between that and normal streaming from the phone or iPad such as audiobooks, videos, phone calls, etc I stream a good 50 hours a week).

There is a much smaller version of my hearing aid, with exactly the same features, but I'd only get perhaps 2 days on a set of batteries. Using BTLE instead of normal Bluetooth might mean I can get the life I'm getting now out of the smaller aids, or perhaps close to 2 weeks with my current aids.

I think the greater good here though, is to eliminate the Zinc Air batteries completely. There are rechargeable hearing aids already but the battery life vs. size is a huge concern, they are quite a bit larger than a Zinc Air aid with similar battery life. Zinc Air batteries have an enormous energy potential because they're catalytic, they draw air through pores and use the reaction to create electricity. So, they need to only hold the catalyst and fuel, not the reactant (the air). Most batteries are self-contained with all components internal. This chart shows how much more energy a Zinc Air battery has by weight or by volume, vs LiIon:


But, Zinc Air has drawbacks. It's a disposable battery of course so there's the cost of constant replacement, and the waste of discarded shells. If the power needs can be reduced enough, then hearing aids could be made the same size or smaller than mine, with rechargeable batteries that will last at least a couple of days and still have all the MFi features.

I'm sure by the time I'm due for replacements (every 4 years under insurance) the BTLE will be in many of the MFi aids, and hopefully they'll be rechargeable.