Qualcomm Files New Lawsuit in Ongoing Apple Feud, Now Targeting Four Major iPhone Suppliers

In the ongoing feud between Apple and Qualcomm, the latter company today has brought four of Apple's main iPhone and iPad suppliers into the legal battle by filing a breach of contract complaint against Foxconn, Pegatron, Wistron, and Compal.

Qualcomm has sued the four manufacturers for "breaching their license agreements" by failing to pay royalties on the use of Qualcomm's technology in the assembly of Apple's devices. For its part in the production of iPhones, Qualcomm supplies the LTE modem in Apple's smartphone.


The cessation of royalty payments by the iPhone manufacturers isn't too surprising, as it follows a report from April in which Apple itself stopped paying its suppliers for royalties related to Qualcomm. According to Qualcomm, "the manufacturers say they must follow Apple’s instructions not to pay," so in retaliation Qualcomm is suing the four companies, asking them to comply with long-standing contractual obligations as well as pay any withheld royalties.

Qualcomm said that Foxconn, Pegatron, Wistron, and Compal are still paying royalties for Qualcomm technology related to non-Apple products "under the very same agreements that apply to the Apple products." Qualcomm further mentioned that its license agreements with the manufacturers began before Apple even sold its first iPhone, meaning that "Apple is not a party to the agreements" and shouldn't be able to interfere so heavily in its business.
“It is unfortunate that we must take this action against these long-time licensees to enforce our agreements, but we cannot allow these manufacturers and Apple to use our valuable intellectual property without paying the fair and reasonable royalties to which they have agreed,” said Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel of Qualcomm.

“As Apple continues to collect billions of dollars from consumer sales of its Qualcomm-enabled products, it is using its market power as the wealthiest company in the world to try to coerce unfair and unreasonable license terms from Qualcomm in its global attack on the company. Our license agreements with Apple’s manufacturers remain valid and enforceable. The manufacturers must continue to live up to their obligations under these agreements and Apple should immediately cease its tortious interference.”
In the original report relating Apple's suspension of royalty payments, the move was suggested to hurt Qualcomm to the tune of $500 million, causing the company to adjust its third quarter guidance from $5.3 billion - $6.1 billion in revenue down to $4.8 billion - $5.6 billion. The argument between the two companies originates back to an FTC complaint regarding Qualcomm's anticompetitive patent licensing practices, for which Apple sued Qualcomm, accusing the company of charging unfair royalties for "technologies they have nothing to do with."

The feud reached a boiling point in April due to Apple's decision to stop royalty payments to its manufacturers in relation to Qualcomm technology, and would continue doing so until the conflict was resolved. The move particularly hurt Qualcomm because the company's licensing deals are directly with iPhone suppliers, like the four it is now suing, and not Apple itself.

In a statement given last month, Apple said, "We've been trying to reach a licensing agreement with Qualcomm for more than five years but they have refused to negotiate fair terms." The company called Qualcomm's demands "unreasonable," arguing that Qualcomm has been "charging higher rates" based on Apple's own innovation in its devices, "not their own."



Top Rated Comments

(View all)
Avatar
28 months ago
Oooh, they should try suing the users too! They are benefiting from Qualcomm tech without paying. Also, there are the companies that ship Qualcomm's stuff and don't pay royalties. And of course tech news sites should pay. They are making ad revenue off of Qualcomm!
Rating: 7 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
Apple will end up back-paying. The issue isn't the validity of the patent, it's the cost. Apple is claiming that the price is unfairly/inconsistently applied to different companies. Apple is withholding further payments until the court determines a fair rate. At that point Apple will pay the new agreed amount.
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
Let the game begin!

Qualcomm vs everybody.
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
Intel better step up their modem game...
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago

I think the more it is Qualcomm vs everybody, the less likely Qualcomm is to win. I don't know anything about the licensing for this particular part, but if there is a way for anyone else to make this part and Qualcomm looses the court case...no more Qualcomm

Qualcomm owns the patents behind wireless communication technology. Even if someone else invented a replacement chip, they'd still have to license spectrum-related patents. It's like that FRAND lawsuit between Apple and Nokia years back over 3G patents.
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago

Is Qualcomm the only player in the game for this technology and can it be done else where?

I don't think you can be backward compatible and not use their patents - you can come up with a clean room implementation for next gen 6G but since you will need to support 3G/4G/5G, you will still have to pay up.
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
Apple is trying to negotiate because either A. They are switching completely to intel in their next chips. Or B. They have a new chip up their sleeve that they have devoloped
Rating: 2 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
Intel's next gen modem has caught up with Qualcomm's X16 modem or is at par. That's why Apple is having a go at them. But Apple has stopped all royalties means that Apple's lawyers have found foolproof case with them.
Rating: 2 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
I think the more it is Qualcomm vs everybody, the less likely Qualcomm is to win. I don't know anything about the licensing for this particular part, but if there is a way for anyone else to make this part and Qualcomm looses the court case...no more Qualcomm
Rating: 1 Votes
Avatar
28 months ago
Can't wait until 5G is here.

With 3G and LTE, Qualcomm has a stranglehold on the patents, but it'll be Huawei and ZTE's time to shine for 5G.
Rating: 1 Votes
[ Read All Comments ]