New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

New 13-Inch MacBook Pro Sans Touch Bar is Marginally Faster But More Efficient Than Last Year's Base Model

Benchmarks for Apple's new 13-inch MacBook Pro without the Touch Bar are beginning to collect on Geekbench, providing a closer look at the notebook's performance improvements and energy efficiency.

13-inch-macbook-pro-2016-vs-2015
The entry-level model, powered by a Skylake-based 2.0GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processor, currently has an average multi-core score of 6,970, indicating the notebook is only up to 7% faster than the early 2015 base model 13-inch MacBook Pro. Last year's comparable model, equipped with a Broadwell-based 2.7GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processor, currently has an average multi-core score of 6,497.

The late 2016 model is also slightly faster than last year's mid-range 13-inch MacBook Pro, while slightly outperformed by the higher-end model.

macbook_pro_2016_geekbench
The notebooks are each calibrated against a baseline score of 4,000, which is the score of Intel's high-end Core i7-6600U processor.

While the performance improvements are negligible, the new 13-inch MacBook Pro sans Touch Bar's 15-watt chip is more energy efficient than the 28-watt chip in last year's entry-level model. The lower power consumption gives the 2016 base model comparable battery life to last year's model despite having a smaller 54.5-watt-hour battery versus the 74.9-watt-hour battery in last year's comparable.

Given that the non-Touch Bar model's 6360U chip would typically be appropriate for the MacBook Air, the new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar should be a more accurate comparable to last year's base 13-inch model. However, it is also $500 more expensive. Benchmarks for that model should be available next month when Apple begins shipping the Touch Bar notebooks to customers.

Related Roundup: MacBook Pro
Tags: Geekbench, benchmarks
Buyer's Guide: MacBook Pro (Neutral)


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

21 weeks ago
Brutal. Years waiting.......for this.


No reason to rehash all the reasons why, you guys know them all.
Rating: 79 Votes
21 weeks ago
Buying the 2015 Retina MBP is turning out to be a masterstroke...
Rating: 57 Votes
21 weeks ago
I've concluded: Under Jobs we received explanations for design choices. Currently: No word about leaving MagSafe behind, no logic for the non-industry-standard audio output on iPhone 7, not a word about the MBP's headphone jack (probably too scared to mention), ...

Jobs' explanations were also fabulous: "The problem with them is really sort of in the bottom 40 there." talking about plastic keyboards on 'smart' phones during iPhone's introduction.

Explanations we now get are 'courage' or Ive's 'making it thinner, lighter and more powerful' that's conflicting with adding a touch screen for example (MR post today).

Change triggers natural resistance and needs reasons to be accepted. Apple doesn't explain=sell their changes/choices any longer.
Rating: 55 Votes
21 weeks ago
New Macbook Pro start-up chime is here:
[MEDIA=youtube]8Kd7LcKbaUA[/MEDIA]
Rating: 49 Votes
21 weeks ago
So...
(1) no performance improvement
(2) no battery life improvement
but
(3) slightly thinner

Sounds about right.
Rating: 41 Votes
21 weeks ago
Removing features and charging more is an awesome business model.
Rating: 36 Votes
21 weeks ago
Thinner notebook, fatter margins.
Rating: 25 Votes
21 weeks ago

Well, this model really replaces the 13-inch Air, not the 13-inch Pro. So a fairer comparison is against the 2.2 GHz MacBook Air, which scored 6561 in Geekbench. 6.2% boost.

Not if you're calling it a "pro". Saying 'it replaces the air' doesn't really mean anything when you've jacked up the price and called it a pro. We are livin in the twilight zone man
Rating: 24 Votes
21 weeks ago
Performance per watt is much higher but is offset by a lower clock speed and a smaller battery. The net result is a thinner and lighter notebook that is about the same speed as last year's with no improvement in battery life. Not sure how many users will find value in the upgrade from the 2015 model - might appeal to those with earlier models though, who were due for an upgrade anyway.
Rating: 24 Votes
21 weeks ago
So disappointing
Rating: 20 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]