A federal jury in Tyler, Texas has ordered Apple to pay $22.1 million to patent firm Acacia Research for violating U.S. Patent No. 8,055,820, related to cellular network technologies, according to court documents filed electronically this week. The monetary award is a running royalty for Apple's infringement through March 2016.

iphone-5s-acacia-research
The jury said Apple did not prove with clear and convincing evidence that any asserted claims of the patent are invalid as obvious or based on improper inventorship. Apple's infringement was found to be willful, which in patent litigation means the patent holder can request that the judge enhance the damages by up to three times, or up to roughly $66.4 million in this particular lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed in January 2014, accused Apple of selling multiple products that infringe upon the patent, including the iPhone 5, iPhone 5c, iPhone 5s, iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad Air, iPad mini, and iPad mini 2. U.S. Patent No. 8,055,820, titled "apparatus, system, and method for designating a buffer status reporting format based on detected pre-selected buffer conditions," is highly technical and at one point was assigned to Nokia.

AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Boost Mobile were also named as defendants for selling the infringing iPhones, but none of the carriers were named in the jury verdict. U.S. Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell presided over the case in the U.S. District Court for Eastern Texas, a popular region for non-practicing entities like Acacia Research and VirnetX to bring patent litigation against companies like Apple.

Acacia Research, based in Newport Beach, California, says it has returned over $705 million to patent owners. The corporation creates a subsidiary company for each set of patents it enforces through litigation, including Cellular Communications Equipment, LLC in this particular Apple lawsuit.

Our partnership with patent owners is the cornerstone of our corporate strategy. Acacia is an intermediary in the patent marketplace unlocking financial value in patented inventions.

Apple has not confirmed if it will appeal the decision.

Top Rated Comments

shanson27 Avatar
92 months ago
Patent trolls
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
leroypants Avatar
92 months ago
Patent trolls
Obviously, anyone who sues Apple for stealing a patent is a patent troll and anyone who Apple sues for stealing a patent is 100% guilty all the time no questions asked.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
kdarling Avatar
92 months ago
Apple generally engages in litigation over the unlawful use of Apple trademarks and copyrights such as product names, like iPod or iPhone. Apple is also a large company that, as a matter of business, does not "go after" smaller companies for the sake of monetary raiding.
Apple is no angel when it comes to IP.

Apple has gone after both small and large companies, for both trademarks and money.

Many people remember them going after a small coffee shop called "Apple Child" in Germany, and many of us remember them actually going after a New York City recycling initiative. Yes, NYC, the original "Big Apple", called that decades before Apple Inc ever existed.



Then there was the time that Apple suddenly removed a third party WiFi sync app from their app store, and later replaced it with their OWN WiFi sync app using almost the same icon.



Let's not even get into how Apple stole the names "iPhone" and "iOS", or how they cheated on their IP deal with Apple Records.

As for monetary gain, they tried to license their (some now invalidated) patents for things like slide-to-unlock to other phone makers for up to $40 a device (!!!), and when nobody would take them up on it, they took them to court... just like your so-called patent trolls do when someone refuses to license their own overpriced IP.

Then they had the gall to whine over paying much smaller royalties for actual IP needed to make a phone work.



Worst of all, Apple helped create one of the world's worst patent troll entities ever (Rockstar). They did this after spending billions to buy older Nortel patents. Rockstar only employed a dozen engineers dedicated to reverse engineering other companies' software to look for infringements they could sue over. Apple's part in this gives troll bashers zero moral ground to stand on.

Finally, the primary reason we see Apple get sued by patent holders so much, is because their policy is to ignore license requests until they are sued. So if you realized that Apple was using something YOU invented, you would have little choice but to sell your patent to a patent holding company large enough to try to fight Apple, because otherwise Apple would ignore you and use your IP without payment.

Attachment Image

Attachment Image

Attachment Image
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
69Mustang Avatar
92 months ago
Technically no.
Unlike patent holding companies, these guys don't actually own the patents.
They are intermediaries for the patent owners.
They get a cut of any settlement/judgement.
No, they are patent trolls. Patent holding companies and patent assertion companies are considered patent trolls; not all, but most of them are. Acacia, by some accounts, is considered the #8 most dangerous patent troll. Their penchant for forming multiple LLC's for suing companies is pretty trolly. Licensing their patents isn't even a safeguard against being sued by one of their "subsidiaries". Both Apple and Microsoft have licensed patents from Acacia only to be sued later.

Was the patent holder doing anything with their invention? Was it a patent that Apple staff found in the US Patent Office? Did Apple staff read about the invention in some sort of journal? What was the publication? Did the inventor offer to sell it to Apple, with Apple declining and reverse engineering it?

What made the infringement willful?

I don't see answers to any of those questions. Doing a google search, all I could find was the same information on multiple sites. They read like a press release from this Acacia Research company ('http://acaciaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/091516-Apple-CCE.pdf').
Afaik the original patent holder of 820 was Nokia, so the patent is valid. All your other questions are moot since Apple was already familiar with Acacia's patent portfolio as Apple had already been a licensee of some of their patents. IANAL, but willful infringement implies knowledge of the patent in question and unlicensed use regardless of that knowledge. If it helps you any, Acacia asserted 5 patents and only 820 passed the sniff test.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Cineplex Avatar
92 months ago
DAMN Trolls! It is time we get proper legislation to stop patient abuse!
Or Apple could license things properly and not steal things that dont belong to them. You think they didn't know about this patten? Just sayin.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CrystalQuest76 Avatar
92 months ago
Was the patent holder doing anything with their invention? Was it a patent that Apple staff found in the US Patent Office? Did Apple staff read about the invention in some sort of journal? What was the publication? Did the inventor offer to sell it to Apple, with Apple declining and reverse engineering it?

What made the infringement willful?

I don't see answers to any of those questions. Doing a google search, all I could find was the same information on multiple sites. They read like a press release from this Acacia Research company ('http://acaciaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/091516-Apple-CCE.pdf').
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 15 Pro Lineup Feature

iPhone 15 Models Feature New Setting to Strictly Prevent Charging Beyond 80%

Tuesday September 19, 2023 2:04 pm PDT by
All of the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro models feature a new battery health setting that prevents the devices from charging beyond 80% at all times when enabled, as confirmed by The Verge's Allison Johnson during a Q&A session today. The new setting is separate from the pre-existing Optimized Battery Charging feature on iPhones, which intelligently delays charging past 80% until a more...
iOS 17 and iPhones Feature

iOS 17: 10 New Features That Just Launched

Sunday September 17, 2023 12:35 pm PDT by
In June, Apple announced iOS 17 with a wide range of new features and changes for the iPhone. Following over three months of beta testing, the free software update will be released this Monday, September 18 for the iPhone XS and newer. Below, we have recapped 10 key features coming to the iPhone with iOS 17, with additional features coming later this year. The update should be released to...
iOS 17

Apple Releases iOS 17.0.1 and iPadOS 17.0.1 With Bug Fixes, Plus iOS 17.0.2 for iPhone 15 Models

Thursday September 21, 2023 10:28 am PDT by
Apple today released iOS 17.0.1 and iPadOS 17.0.1 updates for the iPhone and the iPad, adding bug fixes to the new software. The iOS 17.0.1 and iPadOS 17.0.1 updates come just a few days after Apple launched iOS 17 and iPadOS 17. The software, which is build 21A340, can be downloaded on eligible iPhones and iPads over-the-air by going to Settings > General > Software Update. There is a...
emojipedia 15 1 emoji

Emoji Coming to Future iOS 17 Update Include Shaking Head, Brown Mushroom, Lime, Phoenix and More

Tuesday September 19, 2023 12:43 pm PDT by
As Apple was announcing new iPhone models last week, the Unicode Consortium was officially approving new emoji characters that are set to be added to smartphones starting in 2024. Mockup of new emoji from Emojipedia Approved Unicode 15.1 emoji include phoenix, lime, an edible mushroom, shaking head vertically (as in a "yes" nod), shaking head horizontally (a "no" head shake), and broken...