Samsung_LogoApple has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to rule against Samsung's request to send a longstanding patent lawsuit between the two companies back to lower court for further proceedings, reports Reuters.

Apple told the court that its South Korean rival has "no evidence" that design patent damages should be based on anything less than the value of an entire smartphone, according to court documents filed on Friday. The Supreme Court agreed to hear Samsung's case in December.

Samsung argued that it has been hit with "excessive penalties" for allegedly copying the design of the iPhone. The company claims that the penalties were unfair because Apple was awarded damages from the total profits of the product, while the infringing patent only applied to a component of the smartphone rather than the whole device.

Apple was awarded nearly $1 billion in damages in 2012, but a significant part of the decision was reversed in 2015, leaving Samsung owing $548 million. Samsung has already paid the $548 million, but could win its money back if the ruling is overturned. The patent lawsuit dates back to 2011.

Top Rated Comments

69Mustang Avatar
99 months ago
Apple told the court that its South Korean rival has "no evidence" that design patent damages should be based on anything less than the value of an entire smartphone
Apple should realize they look pretty crappy using that argument since that's exactly how they want damages to be paid when they're on the losing end of lawsuits: damages paid on component cost, not entire device.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
tooltalk Avatar
99 months ago
Arguing that it's only about a specific component is forgetting the larger picture. Steve Jobs was furious, and rightly so, that Samsung made as close to an exact duplicate of the iPhone as they could possibly manage - Google was even trying to talk Samsung out of doing this (per papers that came out at trial). The original complaint was, they've cravenly copied our whole phone, and here's eleventy-seven patents to show that this is true. The court insisted they winnow it down to just a representative handful of patents, because all them details were too durn confusing to expect jurors/judges to pay attention to. So it got reduced to a handful of patent claims, to make things easier for the court. Then some of those patents got thrown out. Samsung was found guilty as hell, and rightly so. And ever since, Samsung has been whining because: a) they don't like having to give money to other people, and b) they apparently really don't understand that slavishly copying every detail of a competitor's product is wrong (this seems to be a cultural difference). Samsung won't stop fighting until they get back the money that they've had to pay Apple. If it were up to Apple, this would have been over several battles ago, but Samsung, despite having repeatedly lost, keeps it going. Sure, they've gone on to make some nice phones since. But then there are plenty of people in jail who have become nicer people than when they committed their crimes - does this excuse their crimes? Samsung got the attention they wanted in the market, early on, by selling close copies of Apple's phones (and that attention has helped them considerably), but they want the benefit of that act without any of the consequences.
Sure, when S Jobs became furious back in 2010, he was looking at HTC smartphones, not Samsung phones. Samsung was not even a big smartphone player back then -- HTC and MOTO were -- and it was an after thought.

While the court documents show Google engineers warned Samsung's tablet designs resembled the iPad's, we know from the court decisions around the world that NO COURT sided with Apple's claim that Samsung copied their tablet design -- and that Apple's design was merely a rehash of old ideas. In the UK for instance, Apple was ordered to publicly apologize to Samsung and to cease their misleading PR campaign against Samsung. Even in the US, where Judge Koh made heroic effort to depict Samsung as an infringer, the jury disagreed with Apple and Judge Koh.

We also know from the court cases around the world that only a few of those initial claims Apple filed still stand today -- and only in one jurisdiction, Apple's hometown court in SJ. Apple was in fact more or less forced to drop all non-US lawsuits once it became clear that all their patent claims have been either worked around, invalidated or thrown out of court elsewhere. In Germany, for instance, all of Apple's entire patent claims were thrown out. Even in the US, most of the so-called marquee patents Apple touted as their genuine innovation have all but been reviewed and invalidated.

In Apple's second trial, after winning a laughable victory in the lower court case in which Apple claimed its originality in autocorrect, hyperlink, etc, the appeals court reversed all of Apple's win and ordered Apple to pay for Samsung's legal expenses.

I'm guessing that you really haven't been following the lawsuits.. or perhaps confirmation-bias much?
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
69Mustang Avatar
99 months ago
Samsung already paid Apple $548M in the end of 2015 (according to Apple's info). Is there still more to pay?
There's no more to pay. There may be some to pay back. Samsung paid the $548M to Apple with the condition that, based on the SCOTUS decision, the money (or a portion of it) could be returned to Samsung. AFAIK, the negotiated $548M is based on a full device calculation. Samsung argues damages should be calculated on component cost. It's the same argument Apple has used before. (There's an ironic joke in there about Samsung copying Apple's legal strategy:D:p)
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Someyoungguy Avatar
99 months ago
You mean manipulate the law and the patent office with bogus claims to force your competitor out of your marketplace or business all together. Or at the very least damage their reputation or ban their prifucts from sale so you can increase market share and profit and sales numbers which in turn allows you to make lazy redesigns of your own competing product. Then yes I'm sure Apple does what anyone else would....
You either don't know the definition of "law", or "manipulate".
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
samcraig Avatar
99 months ago
Apple should realize they look pretty crappy using that argument since that's exactly how they want damages to be paid when they're on the losing end of lawsuits: damages paid on component cost, not entire device.
This, exactly this.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Fall Under Cerulean Kites Avatar
99 months ago
It's when you read things like this that you realize that's something's broken. Apple, Samsung, the legal system, or all three.
What does that 2011 date have to do with anything? So if authorities are investigating a murder that happened 4 years ago, they should just stop wasting time and tell everyone “too bad” because it’s been “so long?”
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

Beyond iPhone 13 Better Blue Face ID Single Camera Hole

Six Reasons to Wait for Next Year's iPhone 17

Thursday February 22, 2024 4:20 am PST by
Apple's iPhone development roadmap runs several years into the future and the company is continually working with suppliers on several successive iPhone models concurrently, which is why we sometimes get rumored feature leaks so far ahead of launch. The iPhone 17 series is no different, and already we have some idea of what to expect from Apple's 2025 smartphone lineup. If you plan to skip...
General Apps Messages

iOS 17.4 to Add This 'Groundbreaking' New Messaging Feature

Friday February 23, 2024 5:05 am PST by
With iOS 17.4, set to arrive in March 2024, Apple is bringing a new cryptographic security feature to iMessage called PQ3. This "groundbreaking" and "state-of-the-art" protocol provides "extensive defenses against even highly sophisticated quantum attacks," according to Apple. Let's break down what that means. Apple's iMessage service already supports end-to-end encryption, but security...
iPhone Notch

Apple Explored These Notch and Dynamic Island Designs for iPhones

Friday February 23, 2024 2:05 pm PST by
With the iPhone 14 Pro models in 2022, Apple introduced the Dynamic Island, which can morph and expand to display system alerts, sports scores, and a variety of other information. The feature makes the space surrounding the front camera and Face ID sensors useful compared to the notch on older iPhone models. Apple explored a variety of ideas for the iPhone's notch area over the years before...
New Macs iPads iOS 17 4

What to Expect at Potential Apple Event in March: iPads, Macs, and More

Friday February 23, 2024 8:35 am PST by
Apple often holds its first media event of the year in March, so the company could be just weeks away from announcing new products. Below, we have outlined what to expect from a potential Apple Event this March. Past Apple Events in March Apple has held five events in March since 2015:Monday, March 9, 2015 Monday, March 21, 2016 Tuesday, March 27, 2018 Monday, March 25, 2019 Tuesday,...
iOS 17

When Will Apple Release iOS 17.4 for iPhones?

Friday February 23, 2024 11:56 am PST by
Apple has been beta testing iOS 17.4 for nearly a month now. Below, we explain when the update is likely to be released to all users. In its press release announcing major App Store changes in the EU, which were implemented in response to new regulations under the EU's Digital Markets Act, Apple confirmed that iOS 17.4 will be released at some point in March:Developers can learn about these...
iOS 18 Mock Feature Baubles

iOS 18 Rumored to Have Design Changes, macOS Revamp Coming Later

Sunday February 25, 2024 8:55 am PST by
iOS 18 will likely include some design changes, but a macOS revamp might be a year or two away, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman said Apple is working to update the design of iOS as "early as this year." A sketchy rumor claimed that iOS 18 would feature some visionOS-inspired design elements, and while Gurman agreed that iOS could take some...