Earlier this month a federal appeals court decided that an employee "acted without authorization" after he used a former co-worker's password login without their permission, in order to gain access to a collection of their data. Concerning the case The United States of America v. David Nosal, this has led to a decision by the court to rule that password sharing is a federal crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, meaning that sharing your login among friends and family for accounts like Netflix and HBO Go could now be an illegal act (via TechCrunch).

Judge McKeown, who is close to the case and wrote its opinion, admitted that more innocent forms of password sharing "bears little resemblance" to the circumstances presented in the lawsuit that ignited the ruling. McKeown urged future judges and courts to consider how important "facts and context" are to each case, and craft rulings surrounding password-sharing lawsuits and their legality from there.

netflix2.jpg
While the daily sharing of passwords has yet to be designated as a violation of federal law, some do see the new ruling as a slippery slope to a future where giving a friend your HBO Go login could land you in a heap of trouble. Judge Reinhardt took the dissenting opinion on the case, commenting that while David Nosal may have gotten into "criminal or civil" liabilities while logging into his co-worker's accounts, "he has not violated the CFAA."

This case is about password sharing. People frequently share their passwords, notwithstanding the fact that websites and employers have policies prohibiting it. In my view, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) does not make the millions of people who engage in this ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless conduct into unwitting federal criminals. Whatever other liability, criminal or civil, Nosal may have incurred in his improper attempt to compete with his former employer, he has not violated the CFAA. — Judge Stephen Reinhardt, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

An act so widely perpetrated is far less likely to incur major legal repercussions, even if it does become enacted on more of a wider scale, but there is still a possibility for the federal appeals court's decision to let companies decide on their own whether password sharing should be more strictly reprimanded or not. Comments by Netflix earlier this year at CES suggest the company won't be heading in that direction any time soon, as CEO Reed Hastings saw the expansive sharing of their services as "a positive thing."

Top Rated Comments

Glassed Silver Avatar
77 months ago
That law shows very well how lobbying works under the radar.
Ah, it's just there to protect you! Except, when you actively share a password, at worst you're stupid, but at best it's intentional and with someone you trust with whatever the password unlocks.

Thank companies like Netflix for this mess existing.
This has nothing to do with security.
Might as well ban lending your car.
I mean, they could open the trunk with the key!!!! And who knows what you put in there!!!

Glassed Silver:mac
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
oneMadRssn Avatar
77 months ago
Good. If you share your details for a streaming service or online game then you are committing fraud. Plain and simple.
What fraud? At very worst it's a simple breach of contract.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
oneMadRssn Avatar
77 months ago
If you and some buddies, who aren't family, sign up for Spotify and split the family plan pricing between you, then it's fraud. Your intent is to avoid paying for a single user subscription by "pretending" you're family and at the same address.
First, what you described would be against Spotify's Family Plan Terms and Conditions. This is a contract of adhesion essentially, and on point it only says "All account holders must reside at the same address to be eligible for the Spotify Family Plan." So it doesn't actually define family, nor require any lineal or blood relationship. In theory, a bunch of guys living in a frat house with a Spotify family account would not be a breach of this contract. Interestingly, Spotify's larger general Terms and Conditions do not address this at all.

Either way, if people were to do what you described above, it would be a violation of this contract. Spotify's Terms and Conditions discuss breach in a few sections. So Spotify does contemplate and foresee that some users will breach the contract. Should Spotify want, when they become aware of this breach, they can do a number of things including cancelling the contract and deleting the account. This is, simply, a breach of contract. Nothing more. As a party to a contract, you are allowed to breach it and suffer the consequences.

Second, your example fails as it isn't even an example of sharing login information. With Spotify family, each user uses their own login and password and otherwise keeps a wholly separate account. Being in the family plan just means one of the users is responsible for billing.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
lederermc Avatar
77 months ago
The fact that Netflix allows multiple Queues/profiles is a clue that sharing a Netflix password is sanctioned. The media is negligent in spewing this garbage.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JRobinsonJr Avatar
77 months ago
Really silly. Says a lot about how in America, it's all about the money at the expense of loss of personal freedom/decision.
Good. If you share your details for a streaming service or online game then you are committing fraud. Plain and simple.
I don't see this as either extreme. The reality is that some services (eg. cable ID based) are intended and priced for a single user/household, and it is not unreasonable for the provider to ask that you not expand usage beyond that audience. Other services (eg. Netflix) are priced for multiple users and can be used in that context. For example, I pay for the 4-stream 'family' plan on Netflix, and have no problem sharing that login within the family. Either way it is both reasonable and fair for the providers to ask that you respect the intent.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
12vElectronics Avatar
77 months ago
I think this type of court case will never affect Netflix/Hulu etc.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 14 Purple Lineup Feature

Will the iPhone 14 Be a Disappointment?

Saturday May 21, 2022 9:00 am PDT by
With around four months to go before Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 14 lineup, the overwhelming majority of rumors related to the new devices so far have focused on the iPhone 14 Pro, rather than the standard iPhone 14 – leading to questions about how different the iPhone 14 will actually be from its predecessor, the iPhone 13. The iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max are expected...
apple ar headset concept 1

Apple's Headset Said to Feature 14 Cameras Enabling Lifelike Avatars, Jony Ive Has Remained Involved With Design

Friday May 20, 2022 6:50 am PDT by
Earlier this week, The Information's Wayne Ma outlined struggles that Apple has faced during the development of its long-rumored AR/VR headset. Now, in a follow-up report, he has shared several additional details about the wearable device. Apple headset render created by Ian Zelbo based on The Information reporting For starters, one of the headset's marquee features is said to be lifelike...
sony headphones 1

Sony's New WH-1000XM5 Headphones vs. Apple's AirPods Max

Friday May 20, 2022 12:18 pm PDT by
Sony this week came out with an updated version of its popular over-ear noise canceling headphones, so we picked up a pair to compare them to the AirPods Max to see which headphones are better and whether it's worth buying the $400 WH-1000XM5 from Sony over Apple's $549 AirPods Max. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. First of all, the AirPods Max win out when it comes ...
apple music

Apple Increases Apple Music Subscription Price for Students in Several Countries

Sunday May 22, 2022 1:57 am PDT by
Apple has silently increased the price of its Apple Music subscription for college students in several countries, with the company emailing students informing them their subscription would be slightly increasing in price moving forward. The price change is not widespread and, based on MacRumors' findings, will impact Apple Music student subscribers in but not limited to Australia, the...
iPhone 13 Face ID

'High-End' iPhone 14 Front-Facing Camera to Cost Apple Three Times More

Monday May 23, 2022 7:05 am PDT by
The iPhone 14 will feature a more expensive "high-end" front-facing camera with autofocus, partly made in South Korea for the first time, ET News reports. Apple reportedly ousted a Chinese candidate to choose LG Innotek, a South Korean company, to supply the iPhone 14's front-facing camera alongside Japan's Sharp. The company is said to have originally planned to switch to LG for the iPhone...