Fitness Bands Continue to Outsell Smartwatches in Wearable Market

Three out of four wearable devices worn by U.S. consumers are fitness bands, over half of which are made by Fitbit, according to new statistics released today.

According to Kantar Worldpanel ComTech’s wearable tech report 2016, more than one in ten consumers in the U.S. own a wearable device (12.2 percent of survey respondents), yet despite smartwatch vendors like Apple promoting advanced features over and above health and fitness capabilities, fitness bands are showing no signs of wavering popularity.

Fitbit Apple Watch
"For both smartwatch and fitness band buyers – brand, ease of use, and functionality are the top drivers of purchase, outweighing both design and cost," said Shannon Conway, wearable tech analyst for Kantar Worldpanel ComTech. "Fitbit established itself as an early market leader, capturing 61.7 percent of the U.S. installed base by communicating a clear and simple value proposition to consumers." By contrast, Apple accounts for only 6.8 percent of the total number of fitness bands and smartwatches owned in the US.

In the two months ending with March 2016, Fitbit claimed more than 50 percent of wearable purchases with the sales period only partially covering its newest releases, the Blaze and the Alta. Apple and Garmin trailed in second and third, respectively.

In the same period, Fitbit's Flex continued to be one of the top-selling models among fitness bands and smartwatches combined, behind the Fitbit Charge and Charge HR. Overall sales of wrist-worn wearables were driven largely by online purchases (63 percent) and particularly through Amazon.com, which has proven to be Fitbit's top retailer.

Meanwhile in Europe, wearables have not seen the same popularity as in the U.S., achieving only half the market penetration (6.6 percent), while Fitbit does not dominate the market the way it does on the other side of the Atlantic. "Of the combined fitness band and smartwatch base, Fitbit remains the most-owned brand at 18.5 percent, but Apple and Samsung follow closely with 14 percent and 11.6 percent, respectively," said market analyst Lauren Guenveur. Europe's big four markets include Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy.

Earlier this week, Fitbit CEO James Park explained in an interview how he decided to re-engineer Fitbit products to support Bluetooth following the introduction of the iPhone 4s (the first iPhone to support Bluetooth 4.0), which made the the Fitbit One and the Fitbit Zip highly successful as a result. Since then, Fitbit has made an effort to stray away from Apple's approach to product design, focusing on simple devices to make wearables more approachable while avoiding "feature overload".

Fitbit sold 21.4 million devices in 2015, earning $1.86 billion in revenue. While Apple doesn't break out sales of the Apple Watch, IDC and Strategy Analytics estimates put sales at approximately 11.4 million.

The full Kantar Worldpanel ComTech Quarterly Wearables Report can be viewed here.

Tag: Fitbit


Top Rated Comments

(View all)
Avatar
12 months ago
Of course. They have great battery life, very functional, and are affordable.

3 things the Apple Watch isn't.
Rating: 17 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago

I owned a FitBit, a Jawbone and a Nike Gear. I junked all those, and wear an Apple Watch because it's so much better. Battery life is irrelevant. It lasts all day and is charging on my nightstand every night.

...

The Apple Watch is so much better in every way.


So if it's on a nightstand charging how is an Apple Watch tracking your sleep pattern and RHR? If the battery needs charging almost every day how is it both a non-issue and "better in every way" because clearly it isn't.

It might have a good enough battery for a "smart watch" but when compared to dedicated fitness devices which are also platform agnostic it doesn't hold up at all. And when compared to something like a Fenix 3 the Apple Watch is absolutely pitiful in every regard from a sports and fitness perspective.

So better in every way? No, not even close to an accurate statement.
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago
Fitbit is still wicked popular, and the Apple watch just can't compete at the price point. Its a device that is very apple like in its simplicity, yet Apple's watch is unlike other apple products in that its not that simple to operate.
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago

Of course. They have great battery life, very functional, and are affordable.

3 things the Apple Watch isn't.


Yep.

The Apple watch doesn't compete with fitness bands.
My Fitbit lasts all week and track calories. Apple watch doesn't which is why it's not doing as well as it could.

Apple watch 1 - battery doesn't last a day
Apple watch 2 - new feature, battery lasts 1 day!
Apple Watch 3 - battery lasts 2 days. It's 50% better!
Apple Watch 4 - etc..

Meanwhile, i'm sure all other fitness trackers will last a month on a single charge, track calories, barcode scan and do all other sorts of body tracking.
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago

Of course. They have great battery life, very functional, and are affordable.

3 things the Apple Watch isn't.


The Apple Watch battery is great. It lasts me all day and then some. Yesterday I wore it all day and I ended the day with 68% battery left. I use my watch for directions, text messages, phone calls and more. I call that functional. They are pricey. I'll give you that, but please actually try out devices before you assume they suck.
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago
Apple should definitely make a fitness band, the activity app was the one thing I missed when I sold my Apple Watch - I now have a FitBit Alta, but it's basic and ugly, though funtional
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago
The price alone as a massive differentiator here, they are very approachable to a lot of people
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago

It's not designed to be a sleep tracker. If you want a sleep tracker get something else. As far as tracking health. I have no problem with it tracking my workouts and running. You clearly don't know how to use your device correctly.


you did say in every way
Rating: 2 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago

Of course. They have great battery life, very functional, and are affordable.

3 things the Apple Watch isn't.


The main reason is that they're cheaper.

Fitness bands have far LESS functionality, and because of this, they have much better battery life.

I owned a FitBit, a Jawbone and a Nike Gear. I junked all those, and wear an Apple Watch because it's so much better. Battery life is irrelevant. It lasts all day and is charging on my nightstand every night. The Apple Watch is my alarm clock as well.
[doublepost=1462365698][/doublepost]

the battery on mine is pure crap. i bought it in April of last year and its down to 70% after 90 minutes of "usage" which translates to sitting on my desk checking the time occasionally


Something's wrong with it. I got mine in May last year, use it every day, charge every night. Battery is still the same.

Charge is still 94% after 2 1/2 hours of checking time, viewing a few text messages and alerts, and playing music. Something's wrong with yours. Either that, or it's searching for a bluetooth connection to your phone, or some apps in the background are doing something wrong.
[doublepost=1462366026][/doublepost]

Yep.

The Apple watch doesn't compete with fitness bands.
My Fitbit lasts all week and track calories. Apple watch doesn't which is why it's not doing as well as it could.

Apple watch 1 - battery doesn't last a day
Apple watch 2 - new feature, battery lasts 1 day!
Apple Watch 3 - battery lasts 2 days. It's 50% better!
Apple Watch 4 - etc..

Meanwhile, i'm sure all other fitness trackers will last a month on a single charge, track calories, barcode scan and do all other sorts of body tracking.


I doubt you have used an Apple watch.

Battery lasts well over a day. Every time. On high intensity days (lots of alerts, text messages, long workouts using music), I've gotten it to 19%. Other days it's 40% when I go to bed after 18 hours and put it on the charger. Battery is a non-issue.

The Apple Watch tracks calories. Swipe to the right on the activity icon - it's right there. And gives you a circular graph showing what percentage of your daily goal you've hit. The Apple Watch tracks steps, heart beat, exercise, hours stood, etc.

The Apple Watch is much more expensive, which is why FitBit is outselling it. I had a FitBit before, and it's in my dresser drawer, never used since I got the Apple Watch. The Apple Watch is so much better in every way.
Rating: 2 Votes
Avatar
12 months ago
a fitness band for sports is what an Kindle is for reading next to an iPad. Of course its better cuz it only got to focus on one main function :) plus you dont have to charge either for like a month
Rating: 2 Votes
[ Read All Comments ]