Apple Store No Longer Sells iPhone With 2-Year Contract on AT&T

Apple overnight removed the option to purchase a new iPhone on a two-year contract with AT&T on the Apple Online Store, eliminating the ability for customers to purchase an iPhone for a subsidized price of $199 or $299 through the carrier. Apple now sells iPhones on AT&T exclusively through the AT&T Next carrier financing program, while two-year contracts remain available through Verizon and Sprint.

AT&T Next iPhone Apple Store
AT&T Next allows a customer to purchase a new iPhone for $0 down and make equal payments for 12, 18 or 24 months until the full price of the smartphone has been paid, at which point the device can be traded in for a new iPhone. The full price breakdown for each iPhone model on AT&T Next, available through both the Apple Online Store and Apple Retail Store, is listed below.

iPhone 6
- 16GB: From $21.64/month
- 64GB: From $24.97/month
- 128GB: From $28.30/month

iPhone 6 Plus
- 16GB: From $24.97/month
- 64GB: From $28.30/month
- 128GB: From $31.64/month

The shift away from two-year contracts is not specific to Apple or iPhone, but rather part of a larger move by AT&T. Droid-Life reported last month that AT&T would begin moving away from two-year contracts on June 1, although the report claims that the option will remain available through AT&T's website, company-owned retail stores, local dealers via direct fulfillment and customer service.

Top Rated Comments

Tapdawg Avatar
91 months ago
I can't believe the amount of people fooled by the AT&T Next plan...

Let's do the math: AT&T says that the Samsung Galaxy S4 will have a monthly installment fee of $32, on top of your existing AT&T service fees, which already include a device subsidy. The exact amount of that subsidy is unknown, but most industry estimates have put it at something like $20 per month. That's how you can get a GS4 for $199 with a new two-year contract, even though it costs $620 at retail: after two years, AT&T will have collected $680 in total device payments from you, and you get to keep the phone.

But the balance tips entirely towards AT&T with Next. Assuming that same $20 subsidy, after 12 months of Next you will have paid AT&T $384 in Next monthly installments and $240 in device subsidies, for a grand total of $620. Again, that's exactly the full retail cost of an unlocked Galaxy S4 — but you don't get to keep that phone, even though you just paid full price for it. You have to trade it in to get a new phone — effectively giving AT&T a free GS4 to refurbish and resell to its next unwitting customer.

Now, you do get to keep your Next phone if you pay 20 monthly installments, which will cost you a whopping $1,040 if you assume a $20 subsidy: $640 in Next payments, plus $400 in subsidies built into your AT&T plan. That's $420 in pure profit for AT&T, which just made you pay full price for a phone while charging you inflated service prices that include a subsidy specifically designed to lower the upfront cost of that phone.

source: http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/16/4528404/att-next-phone-upgrade-plans-a-huge-ripoff
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
HobeSoundDarryl Avatar
91 months ago
I do a lot of iPhone upgrades at my job for AT&T. 9/10 people choose 2 year contracts. AT&T could go out of business for this.
Isn't that likely price driven? With 2-year contact, get the new iPhone for only $199?

The new plan is $0 down for a new iPhone and you pay it out over 12-24 months. Nothing really changes much except customers attracted to $199 might be even more attracted to $0.

I think you are thinking that the end of 2-year contracts means having to pay full price up front for iPhones. That doesn't appear to be the new version of the (same) game.

From my perspective, unbundling the purchase of the phone from a contract appears to be great for consumers. Conceptually, the old way could have a fixed monthly rate carry on well after the cost of the phone is recouped. The new way appears to be a no-interest loan for the cost of the phone which, once it's paid off, falls off of the monthly bill for the balance of the time one might keep using that phone. Paired with shifting from generally $100-$200 down to $0 down, it seems they can sell more phones AND actually deliver a better value for their clients (the latter of which seems very un-AT&T-like... so I must be missing something here).
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gramirez2012 Avatar
91 months ago
Wow, that sucks. That's how I've always purchased my iPhones.

No way in hell I'm giving up my grandfathered unlimited data plan.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jeremypodom Avatar
91 months ago
I do a lot of iPhone upgrades at my job for AT&T. 9/10 people choose 2 year contracts. AT&T could go out of business for this.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
s8film40 Avatar
91 months ago
I've been an AT&T customer since well before the iPhone, but if they stop offering the 2 year pricing that might be the tipping point for me to switch.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
s8film40 Avatar
91 months ago
Having looked at this, the new program is better for the user. After you've paid off the phone, you no longer pay the phone surcharge like you did with the 2-year contract (i.e., if you keep your phone longer then two years, your bill doesn't go down). You're free to keep your phone after that, but if you want to upgrade earlier, then you have to trade in your phone.

Of course, you're always free to purchase the phone outright, from what I'm hearing, on the new plan, they'll still honor the Unlimited plan folks.

I'd expect Verizon to follow this before the next iPhone comes out.
The "discounted" next plan is more than my current plan so for me this represents buying the phone outright and raising the monthly cost of my plan.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 14 Purple Lineup Feature

Will the iPhone 14 Be a Disappointment?

Saturday May 21, 2022 9:00 am PDT by
With around four months to go before Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 14 lineup, the overwhelming majority of rumors related to the new devices so far have focused on the iPhone 14 Pro, rather than the standard iPhone 14 – leading to questions about how different the iPhone 14 will actually be from its predecessor, the iPhone 13. The iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max are expected...
apple ar headset concept 1

Apple's Headset Said to Feature 14 Cameras Enabling Lifelike Avatars, Jony Ive Has Remained Involved With Design

Friday May 20, 2022 6:50 am PDT by
Earlier this week, The Information's Wayne Ma outlined struggles that Apple has faced during the development of its long-rumored AR/VR headset. Now, in a follow-up report, he has shared several additional details about the wearable device. Apple headset render created by Ian Zelbo based on The Information reporting For starters, one of the headset's marquee features is said to be lifelike...
sony headphones 1

Sony's New WH-1000XM5 Headphones vs. Apple's AirPods Max

Friday May 20, 2022 12:18 pm PDT by
Sony this week came out with an updated version of its popular over-ear noise canceling headphones, so we picked up a pair to compare them to the AirPods Max to see which headphones are better and whether it's worth buying the $400 WH-1000XM5 from Sony over Apple's $549 AirPods Max. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. First of all, the AirPods Max win out when it comes ...
apple music

Apple Increases Apple Music Subscription Price for Students in Several Countries

Sunday May 22, 2022 1:57 am PDT by
Apple has silently increased the price of its Apple Music subscription for college students in several countries, with the company emailing students informing them their subscription would be slightly increasing in price moving forward. The price change is not widespread and, based on MacRumors' findings, will impact Apple Music student subscribers in but not limited to Australia, the...
iPhone 13 Face ID

'High-End' iPhone 14 Front-Facing Camera to Cost Apple Three Times More

Monday May 23, 2022 7:05 am PDT by
The iPhone 14 will feature a more expensive "high-end" front-facing camera with autofocus, partly made in South Korea for the first time, ET News reports. Apple reportedly ousted a Chinese candidate to choose LG Innotek, a South Korean company, to supply the iPhone 14's front-facing camera alongside Japan's Sharp. The company is said to have originally planned to switch to LG for the iPhone...