New Retail Chief Ahrendts to Oversee Apple Store Restructuring, New Store Construction

[url=https://www.macrumors.com/2014/06/16/apple-angela-ahrendts-restructuring/] At the current point in time, stores are organized into geographical regions, but Ahrendts wants to restructure, instead grouping stores based on sales volume and customer demographics.

NOT. GOOD.

I've been through this in Michigan, with Macys. Live in a predominantly wealthy area? You get presented with one kind of Macys. Live in an area with a range of incomes? You get presented with an entirely different kind of Macys, unkempt and not stocking the products one would expect out of "Macys".

The overall effect is to greatly dilute the value of the brand, since the company presents a different level of customer experience depending on location, all under that same brand name. And as a customer, it REALLY grates you to be presented a shabbier store in your locale, all by intent.

Like I said: NOT. GOOD.

Hey Ahrendts - You want to create a different customer experience? Simple - start up "sidecar" brand names.... Want to target fashionistas? Call the brand "Candy Apple", and put THOSE stores where they make sense. A store that handles high-end AppleTV gear? "Golden Apple".

There - I'll give you that one, and if you implement it, just send me a fully loaded Mac Pro...

Simply EVERYTHING is done to maximise profit. Will this revamping be an improvement for customers? Highly unlikely.

The best way to maximize profit is to make things better for your customers.

I just want her to streamline the whole store experience. Here's why I dislike going to Apple Stores and always try to avoid them:

-Crowded - almost impossible to move at peak times.
-Confusing - not clear who to talk to or where to go to get help or check out. You often get passed off two or three times to get what you need, or end up just standing around trying to catch someone's attention
-Time consuming - very hard to just get in and get out if you already know what you want
-Ignorant - if you're an enthusiast like most of the people on this site, the sales associates are almost painfully ignorant. The last one I talked to didn't know what an SSD was re: MBP hard drives
-Condescending - the flip side of the last one. They will treat you like a newbie even if you are long time customer and insist on explaining basic stuff to you at length.
-Too familiar/casual - last time I bought a MBP from an Apple store, spending well over $2000, they never said "thank you" or "have a nice day" or anything like that. Even when I first said I would like to purchase it, the response was an indifferent "ok". They are trying to be hip and casual, but it can come across as disrespectful and unappreciative.

I know lot of people feel the same way. Everyone I know groans when they have to visit the Apple Store for something. Arendt should focus on making the retail stores a positive experience again for both newcomer and fans alike.

NOT. GOOD.

I've been through this in Michigan, with Macys. Live in a predominantly wealthy area? You get presented with one kind of Macys. Live in an area with a range of incomes? You get presented with an entirely different kind of Macys, unkempt and not stocking the products one would expect out of "Macys".

The overall effect is to greatly dilute the value of the brand, since the company presents a different level of customer experience depending on location, all under that same brand name. And as a customer, it REALLY grates you to be presented a shabbier store in your locale, all by intent.

Like I said: NOT. GOOD.

Hey Ahrendts - You want to create a different customer experience? Simple - start up "sidecar" brand names.... Want to target fashionistas? Call the brand "Candy Apple", and put THOSE stores where they make sense. A store that handles high-end AppleTV gear? "Golden Apple".

There - I'll give you that one, and if you implement it, just send me a fully loaded Mac Pro...

Eh. Macys has a lot more products than an Apple store. I think you might be looking at this wrong.

I'm sure all stores will have the same baseline for stock, and they will all sell all Apple items like they do right now.

But, if you have a store that say sells a lot of Macbook Pros, then they may start keeping more different variations (HDD, Memory, etc) in stock than they do now, possibly keeping an eye on the BTO's that are delivered to the store.

NOT. GOOD.

I've been through this in Michigan, with Macys. Live in a predominantly wealthy area? You get presented with one kind of Macys. Live in an area with a range of incomes? You get presented with an entirely different kind of Macys, unkempt and not stocking the products one would expect out of "Macys".

The overall effect is to greatly dilute the value of the brand, since the company presents a different level of customer experience depending on location, all under that same brand name. And as a customer, it REALLY grates you to be presented a shabbier store in your locale, all by intent.

Like I said: NOT. GOOD.

Hey Ahrendts - You want to create a different customer experience? Simple - start up "sidecar" brand names.... Want to target fashionistas? Call the brand "Candy Apple", and put THOSE stores where they make sense. A store that handles high-end AppleTV gear? "Golden Apple".

There - I'll give you that one, and if you implement it, just send me a fully loaded Mac Pro...

Thanks for this, it's an excellent example of how that restructuring might turn out. I've definitely noticed the difference in Macys stores in different regions -- hopefully Apple doesn't go that extreme.

I can get to 5 Apple Stores within an hour of where I live, and I've enjoyed going to them.
They are a Mecca for even non-apple users, and if the plan is to change them to suit the geographic location, then that will sour the experience in my opinion - getting different experiences in different stores.

To be honest, I have no idea what the writer is trying to say. How can you group stores based on sales volume? What does that even mean?

When I worked there a few years ago, stores were grouped based mostly on their location. This put the incredibly small mall store that I worked at in the same "group" as some of the flagship stores in NYC.

To me, that means the folks (HR, logistics, operations, marketing) responsible for that market have to deal with smaller, more rural stores, as well as the bonkers busy NYC stores. Things that work well for one group don't necessarily work well for the other.

Maybe it'd be easier for folks managing groups to do a better job if all of the stores in their "group" were similar. Don't bother the group that's managing the super-busy flagship stores with also being responsible for managing a few stores that don't fit that model, when "geographic location" is the only thing the stores have in common?

But, if you have a store that say sells a lot of Macbook Pros, then they may start keeping more different variations (HDD, Memory, etc) in stock than they do now, possibly keeping an eye on the BTO's that are delivered to the store.

It would be extremely stupid if they didn't do this already.

To be honest, I have no idea what the writer is trying to say. How can you group stores based on sales volume? What does that even mean?

Wow lots of words in that 9to5Mac article to basically tell us that Ahrendts is going to reorganize retail leadership based on sales volume instead of region. Does Gurman think if he adds more filler to the story it will seem more important?

…But, if you have a store that say sells a lot of Macbook Pros, then they may start keeping more different variations (HDD, Memory, etc) in stock than they do now, possibly keeping an eye on the BTO's that are delivered to the store.

Or a store that sells a lot of Mac Pros has staff who actually know a thing or two about, say, video and who know what GPUs are beyond a tech spec item to blurt out at sales time.

----------

All these armchair retail experts here are so amusing. Why don't you send your resumes to Apple. Maybe Angela will hire you and then you can poke holes in all her plans.

Well her predecessor didn't fare too well did he :)