New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Apple and Samsung CEOs to Meet for Court-Moderated Settlement Talks over Patent Issues

FOSS Patents reports that the chief executives of Apple and Samsung, along with their respective general counsels, will meet within the next 90 days at a San Francisco courthouse for a court-moderated discussion aimed at settling the long-standing patent dispute between the two companies. As outlined in a joint statement before the court:
As directed by the Court, Apple and Samsung are both willing to participate in a Magistrate Judge Settlement Conference with Judge Spero as mediator. At Apple, the chief executive officer and general counsel are the appropriate decision-makers, and they will represent Apple during the upcoming settlement discussions. At Samsung, the chief executive officer and general counsel are also the appropriate decision-makers, and they will represent Samsung during these settlement discussions.
The report notes that the settlement talks are "semi-voluntary" in that the court can only compel the parties to meet and talk, but can not force them to reach an agreement. It also in the best interest of the two companies to make their most senior officials available for the discussions so as to demonstrate for the court a good faith effort at resolving the dispute.

Apple would obviously be represented by CEO Tim Cook and general counsel Bruce Sewell, while Samsung would appear to be sending representatives from the parent company including CEO Gee-Sung Choi.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

64 months ago
More disputes need to be settled with "sit downs". Less litigation and less money going to lawyers is always a good thing.
Rating: 23 Votes
64 months ago
I'm tired of patents making the news. I just want cool stuff.
Rating: 17 Votes
64 months ago
There was a cover piece about this a few weeks back in BusinessWeek that started with the summary of some proceedings in California when the judge openly mocked Apple for bringing on the patent wars. "The last time you were here, you said you had a business relationship - I forget what the number was, $8 million? $8 billion?"

The problem for Apple is that if it doesn't win (or when it doesn't win, as has been the case), it actually impairs the company's position when negotiating cross-licensing deals. Because Steve was too busy throwing a hissy fit and trying to fight a proxy war on Android by crying over rounded corners instead of *actually* taking on Google, it's put the company in a worse position. Tim has done a commendable job of fighting smart battles and ignoring the stupid ones.

Apple has absolutely no reason to negotiate anything with thieves, unless it's under legal compulsion to do so.

Though a simple "discussion" sounds innocuous enough.

The problem is that Apple is complaining over elementary design issues while Samsung countered with legitimate technical patents. For example.... the front of the iPad - ripped off from a 1994 design:

Based on the preliminary ruling from December, taking this to trial wouldn't end well for Apple.
Rating: 14 Votes
64 months ago
What a farce. They should have Judge Judy presiding.

I don't see this going anywhere except back into the boxing ring.
Rating: 13 Votes
64 months ago
Cook Strategy

I wonder if the reason Tim Cook, is so quick to settle disputes with clients, is because he wants Apple to spend their money on things that generate profit.

Apple is spending Hundreds a million on these things that could go towards things that advance technology.

Cook is blazing the trail in wanting to give up on whats been an on-going battle for a few years.


I wonder if Cook is willing to just raise the white flag, and tell competitors don't waist your time in disputes with Apple.
Rating: 12 Votes
64 months ago
I picture the opening scene of Wedding Crashers when I imagine these two companies sitting at a table
Rating: 11 Votes
64 months ago

i wonder what are they fighting about this time, eh? :rolleyes:

Probably arguing about the shape of the conference table.
Rating: 9 Votes
64 months ago

Apple has absolutely no reason to negotiate anything with thieves, unless it's under legal compulsion to do so.

Though a simple "discussion" sounds innocuous enough.

Seriously??? Your commitment to Apple leaves me speechless
Rating: 7 Votes
64 months ago

Because most of the *patent muscle* is in Apple's portfolio.

Apple *has* weapons to use. The others don't. Why? Apple's policy from Day 1 has been to patent everything and anything possible related to what they were doing.

Bro, Apple's patent portfolio is as weak as your ramblings on here:

Apple doesn't patent actual processes - it patents a wishlist of characteristics. The problem for Apple - especially since it's the view of the judge presiding over the case - is that you can't patent functionality. The only reason Apple hasn't received rejection after rejection from the USPTO is that it's a lot easier to accept an application than it is to reject it. Accepting takes a rubber stamp, rejecting requires an in depth report as to why it was rejected.
Rating: 7 Votes
64 months ago

It was a joke calm down.

It wasn't funny.
Rating: 7 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]