Skip to Content

Apple Rules Out Bid for Premier League Football Over Global Rights

Apple services chief Eddy Cue has effectively ruled out the company's rumored bid to obtain the broadcasting rights to the English Premier League for Apple TV+.

apple tv plus banner
Apple has reportedly been interested in obtaining the rights to broadcast the Premier League as far back as 2012. Earlier this year, Bloomberg highlighted Apple's consideration of a bid for the rights to stream the Premier League, among other lower league matches run by the English Football League, for ‌Apple TV‌+.

‌Eddy Cue‌ has now effectively ruled out Apple's intention to make a bid on the basis that it would be unable to obtain global rights. The company sought a deal similar to its rights to broadcast Major League Soccer (MLS) worldwide for a period of ten years, an arrangement hailed as a "historic first for a major professional sports league." Speaking to The Daily Mail, Cue explained Apple's rationale:

I don't like the word exclusivity because that's important but not as important. The global rights are important to us. We're a global company, we have customers in every country in the world, a large number of customers, and it's not exciting for me to have something that you can have but you can't have.

Secondly, we're throwing a significant amount of engineering resources into the product. We think we're going to do some very innovative things with the product as we move forward. We've done some things like MLS 360 (providing live look-ins from every match), we've done the multi-viewing of games, which is again very difficult to do in other environments. And this is nothing.

I can't justify throwing what I think are the best engineers in the world on a small subset product. It has to be this kind of a partnership because our level of investment is significant. This isn't "hey, I've got an opening from 8pm to 10pm tonight and I'm going to put this game on." That's not the way we're doing it. We're all in on this as an investment point of view, so it doesn't work unless it's something significant.

Recent years have seen bidding wars play out for the rights to the Premier League between Sky Sports, BT Sport, and Amazon Prime Video, with Sky Sports often being the dominant player, although Amazon has been increasingly wielding its bidding power in recent years. Packaging terms ensure that no one broadcaster gains rights to all English Premier League matches, so any Apple deal for the Premier League's broadcasting rights would necessarily fall short of the exclusivity deal the company successfully negotiated with MLS. Asked if this meant that Apple was disinterested in the rights to UEFA or the Premier League, Cue said:

I never say no to anything without knowing more specific [information]. But, in general, are we going to sign something, any league, that is to a specific country or small a subset of countries? I highly doubt we would ever do that. I can't see a scenario in which we would want to invest and do that because we're not a typical distributor, we're not just trying to fill in some gaps that we have.

This [MLS deal] is our number one thing, and we want it to be a huge success. If we were going to do something else it wasn't because it would be number two, it's because it would be another number one around it and we would want it to be, so I think that's the difference that we have.

Apple has been pursuing sports content in an effort to attract new viewers to the ‌Apple TV‌+ streaming service. The company has signed deals with Major League Baseball and Major League Soccer, which is currently available on ‌Apple TV‌+ via an MLS Season Pass priced at $14.99 per month or $99 per season. Apple has also reportedly expressed interest in acquiring an NBA streaming package.

‌Apple TV‌+ is also the home of hit sports comedy drama "Ted Lasso," in which an American college football coach is hired to coach an English soccer team.

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
imac video apple feature

Apple Unveils Two New Products

Monday March 2, 2026 7:49 am PST by
Apple today introduced two new devices, including the iPhone 17e and an updated iPad Air. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's A19 chip, MagSafe for magnetic wireless charging and magnetic accessories, Apple's second-generation C1X modem for faster 5G, and a doubled 256GB of base storage. In the U.S., the iPhone 17e starts at $599, just like the ...
Apple iPhone 17e feature

Apple Announces iPhone 17e With A19 Chip, MagSafe, and More

Monday March 2, 2026 6:07 am PST by
Apple today announced the iPhone 17e, featuring the A19 chip, MagSafe connectivity, faster charging, and more. The iPhone 17e contains the A19 chip introduced in iPhone 17. It features a 6-core GPU and a 4-core GPU. Apple pointed out that this makes it up to 2x faster than the iPhone 11. The new 16-core Neural Engine is optimized for large generative models. The iPhone 17e also contains...

Top Rated Comments

34 months ago
sports entities have way too much leverage. good on apple for walking away. although i suppose this is an ironic comment considering that apple also has tons of leverage.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
unfunfionn Avatar
34 months ago

Yeah... the MLB pass is not available worldwide either, I think if they really wanted they could pay for worldwide Premier (and 1ts-tier European) leagues rights (Champions League, perhaps?) and have millions of new Apple subscribers the world over.
Apple News was never released globally, Apple Card is US-only, Siri isn’t available in English on the Apple TV in most countries etc. It’s clearly not the real reason they’re not buying the rights.

Football rights in certain parts of Europe are a mess. In Germany if I want to watch the Premier League and Champions League, I need to subscribe to THREE different services: Sky, DAZN and Prime Video. That’s €70 a month to mostly just watch the games of one team. The price gouging is what will burst the PL bubble eventually, not Saudi Arabia.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
NightFox Avatar
34 months ago
I'm never sure if non-exclusivity for the Premier League (and others) is a good thing or not - on one hand it stops a single provider having too much control, but on the other hand it can force fans into needing to subscribe to multiple services.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Nicefish Avatar
34 months ago
So why can’t I subscribe to MLS in Singapore? Why isn’t there Apple Fitness+ here but it’s available in Malaysia?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
34 months ago
The rule that no broadcaster can purchase the rights for all matches sounds good for competition, but in practice it means that you need more than one streaming service, if you want to watch all matches. We have the same problem in Germany.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
34 months ago
Ok Tim, but let's be honest - in practice the deals for MLS and MLB are pretty much a deal which only relates to 'a specific country or small a subset of countries'. The audience for MLS outside the US is _tiny_ vs. those watching the English Premier League, La Liga or = the Champions league.

I see Tim's comments reflecting more that, as we all know, Apple is USA company and US-specific things will always come first. Getting a Europe-wide, or even a 3-4 country wide deal for the champions league would be a HUGE win and something apple could build in if they proved they could do it well.

it's hard to see what apple's strategy is here other than remaining US focussed.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)