App Store May Violate Japanese Antitrust Law - MacRumors
Skip to Content

App Store May Violate Japanese Antitrust Law

Apple's App Store policies may be violating Japanese antitrust law, according to a new report from the Japan Fair Trade Commission (FTC) that was shared by Nikkei. Japanese regulators do not believe there is enough "competitive pressure" on Apple and Google as the two companies have a duopoly in mobile operating systems and dominate the app market.

iOS App Store General Feature Sqaure Complement
Japanese regulators want Apple and Google to allow users to choose third-party payment methods for apps and services, rather than forcing them to use the built-in purchase options in the ‌App Store‌ and Play Store. Google allows for third-party payment options for apps as of 2022, as does Apple in a very limited number of countries that have passed legislation calling for alternate payments.

The FTC suggested that app store commission rates between 15 and 30 percent could be an abuse of a dominant bargaining position. Apple in response said that a commission-based model was the best way to encourage development, while Google said that most developers are charged rates of 15 percent or less.

The two companies were also accused of manipulating search rankings to favor their own apps over competitors, which they denied.

The Japan FTC is calling for further regulation to suppress anti-competitive behavior, and said that it plans to work with the government council on digital competition on new laws. FTC head Ryota Inaba told Nikkei that the group will "respond strictly to any behavior found to violate antitrust law."

Today's report suggests that Japan could force Apple into accepting third-party payment options, something that it already does in South Korea after the country passed a law banning app store operators from forcing developers to use their billing systems. Apple has a similar allowance for dating apps in the Netherlands, allowing them to accept alternative payment methods after a dispute with the country's Authority for Consumers and Markets.

In Europe, Apple is gearing up to accommodate the Digital Markets Act, which will require it to allow apps to be downloaded on the iPhone using sideloading or alternate app stores, functionality expected as soon as iOS 17.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated

Apple Introduces Major App Store Subscription Overhaul at WWDC 2026

Thursday June 11, 2026 6:50 am PDT by
Apple announced a sweeping set of new subscription tools for App Store developers at WWDC 2026, including cross-developer subscription bundles, group and enterprise purchasing options, retention tools, and a streamlined submission workflow. Subscription Bundles and Suites The main change is a new Bundle and Suite system that lets developers partner with each other to offer combined...
Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Criticizes U.S. Antitrust Bill That Targets the App Store

Thursday June 11, 2026 2:49 pm PDT by
United States Senators Chuck Grassley and Amy Klobuchar this week reintroduced the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA) that targets major tech companies like Apple, and Apple is not happy to see it back. The bipartisan bill is reminiscent of the Digital Markets Act in the European Union, banning large platforms from favoring their own products or services, limiting competitors' ...
iOS App Store General Feature JoeBlue

Apple Adds Personalized Recommendations and New Marketing Tools to the App Store

Monday June 15, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Apple last week announced a series of new App Store features, including personalized app recommendations and expanded tools for developers to market their apps. The most visible change for users is Personalized Collections, a new discovery feature that surfaces app and game recommendations tailored to individual interests and behavior. Alongside each recommendation, new "App Notes" explain...

Top Rated Comments

symphony Avatar
45 months ago

It’s funny how just now, countries are complaining. They were fine with it the last 15 years.
I mean, a lot of things can change within those 15 years, especially as technology becomes more important in everyday lives
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JPack Avatar
45 months ago
iOS 17 and side-loading can't come soon enough.

For any other industry, if there were only two competitors, it would almost certainly violate anti-competition laws.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
hovscorpion12 Avatar
45 months ago
It’s funny how just now, countries are complaining. They were fine with it the last 15 years.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
45 months ago
love to see the hammer being brought down on apple. the walls are collapsing.

don't get me wrong, i love a lot about the products but they need to be brought down a peg.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Realityck Avatar
45 months ago
More incentives for the rumored iOS/IPadOS 17 app store changes to happen, allowing alternative trusted purchase methods. Like buy something via a dev web site and install it from the App Store. In comparison there are no issues when using MacOS via dev web site.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jayducharme Avatar
45 months ago
I don't have enough choice over who provides my electricity. I don't have enough choice over who provides my cellular service. I don't have enough choice over who provides my Internet service. I don't have enough choice over who provides my television broadcasts. But app stores are a much higher priority, evidently.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)