Skip to Content

Here's What the Studio Display's Webcam Looks Like After 15.5 Beta Firmware Update

Apple today released new beta firmware for the Studio Display, which is available to ‌Studio Display‌ users who have the macOS Monterey 12.4 beta installed on their Macs. The updated firmware includes a fix for the webcam, so we thought we'd take a quick look to see the tweaks in action.


Prior to the launch of the ‌Studio Display‌, reviewers noticed that the webcam was not performing as expected. It was described as washed out, grainy, noisy, and overall, poor quality.

After these complaints came out, Apple said that it "discovered an issue where the system is not behaving as expected," promising a fix in a future software update. That fix is out today, and Apple says that it has tuned the camera, improving noise reduction, contrast, and framing.

In practice, if you watch our video up above, there are noticeable quality updates, but the difference is subtle. Colors are not as pale, there's improved contrast, and the overall look is a bit more vibrant. Depending on lighting, there isn't a huge difference in sharpness, but the changes seem to be an overall net improvement.

Six Colors' Jason Snell shared a set of photos and a video that also demonstrate the differences between the new firmware and old firmware, and there is a clear change to the framing. There is less zoom both when using Center Stage and when not using the feature, which means video capture is overall less cropped.


Overall, Apple's changes seem to be for the better, though those hoping for something dramatic may be disappointed. Skin tones are improved as is overall color, and there appears to be an improvement in contrast along with less de-noising for more clarity, but ultimately this is still the same 12-megapixel Ultra Wide camera, so Apple is limited to software tweaks.

For now, ‌Studio Display‌ owners will need the macOS Monterey 12.4 beta to see the 15.5 firmware update, but it will be more widely available when the new version of Monterey sees a public release. The beta is currently available to both developers and public beta testers.

What do you think of the firmware update? Let us know in the comments.

Related Roundup: Studio Display
Buyer's Guide: Displays (Buy Now)
Related Forum: Mac Accessories

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...

Top Rated Comments

50 months ago
In comparing the two, I've concluded that it is still $400 over priced and still can't rotate to portrait.
Score: 46 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️ Avatar
50 months ago
Apple seriously dropped the ball on Studio display by inputting 12-megapixel Ultra Wide Camera in first place. This is a hardware issue.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
50 months ago
It is subtle. Not sure if it is going to change many review scores.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️ Avatar
50 months ago

It’s the same one they use in the iPad.
Correct but that's an iPad. Not a main display monitor. Big difference between those two.

Also, the iPad is last year's model. It's also integrated with iPad OS.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BWhaler Avatar
50 months ago
The hot takes all say it's a modest improvement at best and doesn't bring camera quality to comparable iPad. Perhaps not a last-minute bug like Apple said and more of a fundamental quality issue.

So glad I didn't buy these yet. I've waited for years for an Apple display. What's another 6 months or so. I just hope they fix it for real the next time around.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
nutmac Avatar
50 months ago

Apple seriously dropped the ball on Studio display by inputting 12-megapixel Ultra Wide Camera in first place. This is a hardware issue.
Perhaps I am in the minority but I think Studio Display's camera is fine, especially now that the contrast and color are improved with less denoising artifacts.

Don't get me wrong. I would love iPhone's rear camera (f/1.8 vs f/2.4 aperture), as well as HDR, ProMotion, tilt and height adjustable stand as the standard feature, but I am happy that I no longer have to resort to using LG's Ultrameh monitor.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)