Apple Could Be Forced to Follow New Digital Competition Rules or Face Fines, Under UK Proposal

The U.K. government is today unveiling its plan to regulate tech giants, such as Apple, to ensure that the U.K's digital market, which includes platforms such as the App Store, is open for competition, and not dominated by any particular company.

app store blue banner uk fixed
In April, the U.K. created the DMU or Digital Markets Unit under the Competition and Markets Authority. With newly given powers, that new unit will now be able to designate big tech companies as "Strategic Market Status." Companies with the SMS status will be required to "follow new rules of acceptable behavior" that aim to boost competition and growth for the economy.

The Digital Markets Unit (DMU) will be given the power to designate tech firms that hold substantial and entrenched market power with 'Strategic Market Status' (SMS). This will require them to follow new rules of acceptable behaviour with competitors and customers in a move that will benefit the public and drive growth and innovation across the economy.

The DMU, launched in non-statutory form within the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) in April, will work alongside firms to inject stronger competition into the digital tech sector resulting in more innovation and fairer terms for UK businesses, including startups, news publishers and advertisers. It will bring better consumer choice and control, making it easier for people to take their business elsewhere.

While no companies are directly listed as being designated as "Strategic Market Status," the U.K. has been ramping up its investigations and concerns against Apple. The U.K. and others have been investigating Apple over concerns that it holds a dominant position in the markets that it operates in, a rhetoric Apple has pushed strongly against. Countries are also concerned about alleged anti-competitive behavior undertaken by Apple.

One of the largest concerns of governments, and the catalyst behind Apple's legal battle with game developer Epic Games, is the ‌App Store‌. Apple only allows users to download apps on iPhone and iPad from its ‌App Store‌ platform, which it controls. Apple must approve all apps that go onto the store, and there has been rising pressure for the company to allow users to "sideload" apps, giving users the freedom to download apps beyond the platform.

As part of the new proposal, the Digital Markets Unit may require that companies avoid restricting users to a specific or "default" service to prevent them from limiting competition. That new requirement would branch under a new "mandatory code of conduct" that tech companies would need to follow. If a company fails to follow the code, it could be subjected to fines or could be forced to overturn decisions.

The consultation seeks views on the objectives and powers of the DMU and details a new mandatory code of conduct, which will set out what is expected of firms for fair trading, open choices and trust and transparency. This could include tech platforms not pushing their customers into using default or mandatory associated services, or ensuring third party companies that depend on them aren;t blocked from doing business with competitors.

The code will be underpinned by robust investigation and enforcement powers. These may include imposing fines of a maximum of 10 per cent of a firm's turnover for the most serious breaches.

The DMU could also be given powers to suspend, block and reverse code-breaching behaviour by tech giants - for instance unfair changes in their algorithms or T&Cs - and order them to take specific actions to comply with the code.

One direct implication for Apple could be the DMU overturning decisions it makes regarding the ‌App Store‌. Apple has policies that govern the ‌App Store‌ and a development agreement that all developers must consent to before distributing apps on the platform. Under the proposal, the DMU could possibly overturn some of Apple's ‌App Store‌ decisions, such as what apps are rejected, or even the direct terms and conditions that developers must agree to.

The ‌App Store‌ and its governing policies came under the spotlight last August when ‌Epic Games‌, the makers behind the hit game Fortnite, breached Apple's ‌App Store‌ Guidelines by introducing an unauthorized payment method for in-app purchases. Some are concerned that Apple uses its ‌App Store‌ Guidelines as an unfair way to limit competition.

The U.K's Digital Secretary, Oliver Dowden, called the new measures a "champion" effort to give smaller companies a chance to compete in the digital market and to "make sure" that tech companies play by the rules.

So we will be giving our new Digital Markets Unit the powers it needs to champion competition and drive growth and innovation, with tough fines to make sure the biggest tech firms play by the rules.

Apple has been contacted for a response to the new proposal and we'll update this if we hear back.

Top Rated Comments

Marbles1 Avatar
35 months ago
Good.

Apple are more than happy to follow the laws of countries like China, I'm sure they'll follow the laws of democratic nations too.
Score: 36 Votes (Like | Disagree)
400 Avatar
35 months ago
Problem here is No10. I couldn't trust them to tell me the sun is up. This will not be for anyones benefit apart from brexit flag waving. The two ministers quoted should set alarm bells ringing.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Mac4Mat Avatar
35 months ago
The problem with these government interventions is that usually those involved don't have the foggiest idea of technology and they are more used to pushing bits of paper, hence UK governments have failed repeatedly in getting even basic across the board computer systems functioning.

So whilst restrictive practices are to be deplored, governments bringing in such censorship or rules should be held liable for any failures as a result of their own rules.

For example: if its thrown open to the world to produce whatever apps they like for Apple products, who pays to remove malware, who then complains if sensitive information has been leached from systems as a result of having no control over the content of applications.

Whilst Apple is not 100% successful in weeding out applications that pose a threat, its better than having no control over what is sold to consumers, from vendors and indeed sovereign backed nations whose motivation may have nothing to do with the application they are 'selling' or giving away, but more interested in harvesting data etc.

Its Apple's operating systems, and no one knows better any threats posed to it than Apple, and even then assistance from independent sources aids in culling applications that may be a risk.

With no controls at all, it would absolve Apple of any responsibility to bother with virus protection, malware protection etc. etc.

Far better for these governments to concentrate on consumer issues of a more substantive nature, and not necessarily right to repair, but more importantly PROPER WARRANTIES of 5 years for items over a certain price.

The idea that you can buy a new computer and one year and a day you've lost your investment is crazy. Same with white goods. You shouldn't have to buy extended warranties, the goods should be warranted to last much more than 1 year, as then right to repair is less likely to even be a problem
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ruka.snow Avatar
35 months ago
So as a developer and a consumer, the English government wants to take away my choice of selling and buying to a platform where everything is safe, user friendly, and unified. And like most things like this, we can only complain if the rules aren't being followed, we can't complain if we want the new rules to bugger off.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Roadster Lewis Avatar
35 months ago
I like Apple kit precisely because it is locked down - I like to think I am savvy enough not to install compromised software on my devices, but not so sure about less technically minded users.

There is a choice - if you want freedom to side load etc, buy an Android device...
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Frustratedperson Avatar
35 months ago
And that’s when I will leave the Apple ecosystem and just spend less on Android. 99% off the reason that I go with Apple is for their view on privacy and malware etc. If it’s opened up then there are just as well made phones from the likes of Samsung, Google etc.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 16 Camera Lozenge 2 Perspective Gray

Five Key Upgrades Coming to iPhone 16

Friday March 15, 2024 1:45 pm PDT by
The iPhone is Apple's top-selling product, and it gets an update every year. In 2024, we're expecting the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro lineup, with an arguably more interesting feature set than we got with the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Capture Button All four iPhone 16 models are set to get a whole new button, which will be...
When To Expect New iPads Feature 1

Apple to Announce New iPads on March 26, Rumors Claim

Monday March 18, 2024 4:02 am PDT by
Apple is widely expected to release new iPad Air and OLED iPad Pro models in the next few weeks. According to new rumors coming out of Asia, the company will announce its new iPads on Tuesday, March 26. Chinese leaker Instant Digital on Weibo this morning 日发布%23">claimed that the date will see some sort of announcement from Apple related to new iPads, but stopped short of calling it an...
airpods 3 orange

Two New AirPods 4 Models Expected to Launch in September or October

Sunday March 17, 2024 7:56 am PDT by
Apple suppliers will begin production of two new fourth-generation AirPods models in May, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Based on this production timeframe, he expects the headphones to be released in September or October. Gurman expects both fourth-generation AirPods models to feature a new design with better fit, improved sound quality, and an updated charging case with a USB-C...
iphone se 4 modified flag edges

iPhone SE 4 Expected to Depreciate Heavily

Tuesday March 12, 2024 9:04 am PDT by
Resale value trends suggest the iPhone SE 4 may not hold its value as well as Apple's flagship models, according to SellCell. According to the report, Apple's iPhone SE models have historically depreciated much more rapidly than the company's more premium offerings. The third-generation iPhone SE, which launched in March 2022, experienced a significant drop in resale value, losing 42.6%...
iOS 17 Passkey With Apple ACCOUNT Feature

'Apple ID' Expected to Change to 'Apple Account' Starting With iOS 18

Sunday March 17, 2024 7:13 am PDT by
MacRumors was first to report that Apple was planning to rebrand "Apple ID" to "Apple Account" across its software platforms and websites like iCloud.com as early as this year, and now Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has corroborated this change. A mockup of the new Apple Account branding In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman said the new "Apple Account" branding will start to be used later this...
General iOS 17 Feature Orange Purple

iOS 17.4.1 Update for iPhone is Imminent

Monday March 18, 2024 5:27 am PDT by
iOS 17.4.1 and iPadOS 17.4.1 should be released within the next few days, with a build number of 21E235, according to a source with a proven track record. MacRumors previously reported that Apple was internally testing iOS 17.4.1. As a minor update for the iPhone, it will likely address software bugs and/or security vulnerabilities. It is unclear if the update will include any other changes. ...