Apple to Participate in Meeting Advocating for Better Patient Access to Health Info

Done safely, this would be a complete positive for patients and many providers. Transferring health data between providers is challenging — with some good reason, given the sensitive information involved — but can absolutely be improved.

The proposed rules basically opens up your medical records to be shared indefinitely. This isn't a move to "improve sharing" or "empower patients". It's a move to force health care providers to provide Silicon Valley and any company that just so happens to make an app access to your patient data so that they can profit off it or face massive fines.

I'm assuming if you put all your medical records on your iPhone that you can opt out syncing it to the iCloud since Apple revealed that they will not encrypt your data on the cloud but will provide it to requesting law enforcement.
Next step will be for employers or insurance companies is to force Apple to release medical data stored on a person's icloud account in order to decline employment or insurance due to medical data on their iPhone devices.
Some employers required social media access of their accounts before employment.

Health data is encrypted on the device, Apple has zero access to it, and any encryption key that they have would not access it

A tip from Apple:

Set up your Medical ID in the Health app on your iPhone (https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207021)

This is information you want to have available to medical workers in an emergency.

One of the fields is Blood Type, but don't worry if you don't know your blood type. You'll almost surely be tested before getting a transfusion anyway. But you could ask what blood type you are the next time you get a blood test, and fill it in later.

That‘s not how it works. It’s still encrypted on iCloud, but Apple has the keys to decrypt it when it is required by a court order. Neither Apple nor any commercial third party knows what is backed up. if insurance companies really wanted the data this is one of the much harder ways of getting it.

This is not necessarily true. For users with iOS 12 and two-factor authentication enabled ('https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303#health'), all Health data is end-to-end encrypted and cannot be accessed by Apple even with valid legal process. If two-factor authentication is not enabled, then it’s encrypted at rest, just like all other iCloud data (except emails), but Apple has the keys to decrypt it.

I'm assuming if you put all your medical records on your iPhone that you can opt out syncing it to the iCloud since Apple revealed that they will not encrypt your data on the cloud but will provide it to requesting law enforcement.

For many users (see above), this isn’t the case for Health data. You can opt out, though.

Health data is encrypted on the device, Apple has zero access to it, and any encryption key that they have would not access it

Not necessarily true (see above).

I am not trusting Apple with ANY medical records! Pics, okay, yeah. I have been married longer than digital cock pics have been a thing so I am good, but I am not sharing too much medical info with Apple. To each their own though.

I'm assuming if you put all your medical records on your iPhone that you can opt out syncing it to the iCloud since Apple revealed that they will not encrypt your data on the cloud but will provide it to requesting law enforcement.
Next step will be for employers or insurance companies is to force Apple to release medical data stored on a person's icloud account in order to decline employment or insurance due to medical data on their iPhone devices.
Some employers required social media access of their accounts before employment.

That‘s not how it works. It’s still encrypted on iCloud, but [S]Apple has the keys to decrypt it when it is required by a court order[/S] Apple has the keys to decrypt it if you don't have 2fa ('https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303#health') turned on in the case of a court order. In either case, Apple nor any commercial third party knows what is backed up. if insurance companies really wanted the data this is one of the much harder ways of getting it.

As for employers requiring social media account, that is the employee willingly providing this information in return for being employed and it’s illegal in many states. Even if they are able to require your medical records, what‘s the difference between giving the employer a digital copy or paper/CD? It’s not like this is data they couldn‘t request before in places where it’s legal.
[automerge]1579982709[/automerge]

I don't know whether my records are or are not protected at the hospital right now. What I do know is that letting tech and ad companies near medical records will totally make them NOT protected. If you trust tech and ad companies then that's your problem to deal with. I know that tech and ad companies are not competent enough to ever be able to offer any type of protections. As I said previously, let them indemnify themselves to $1m per record per leak then we can talk about it until then. Until then keep these parasites away, and no opt-out is not the way to do it. Let people who don't value their privacy opt-in to any non-indemnified scheme.

Do you have any data to back up anything that you’re asserting here? iCloud has never been breached or hacked other than when the password was accidentally leaked by the user or through a phishing/social engineering attacks. Equivocating all data leaks to all tech companies Is like saying you won’t buy manufactured food because a couple of food companies caused food poisoning.

Edit: Health data is end to end encrypted if 2fa is turned on from iOS 12 onward.

Epic Systems Advises Hospital Execs Against Interoperability Rule
Judy Faulkner believes the proposed rule will result in app makers gaining access to patient data without consent.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://ehrintelligence.com/news/epic-systems-advises-hospital-execs-against-interoperability-rule[/URL]

Healthcare is a mess. I would love for Apple to be able to help straighten it out, but I would be truly surprised if they can do that.

Just a question, why not? Is there something specific you’re trying to hide? Or is it just the principle of not over sharing with tech companies?

I just don’t see a need for concern considering Apple’s track record. And if there was a compromise of data, what would that do to you?

Idk. Just curious Lol.

Because there is no place needed for Apple to be inbetween the patient (you) and your physician? Because not everything needs to be listened in (remember HomePod?) and yes there needs to be privileges without a third party present. Medical data needs to be independent, there's allready too much industry busy manipulating patient treatment / results, no need for more. Do you trust Apple with your data, apply for a job, get rejected. The wondering why should not cross any suspicion of Apple having looked in your medical file.

So in short should Apple have the my data? For storage perhaps, but not for analyzing any of it, this is privilege to my and my physician and should never be subject to Apples (or other) changing privacy agreement. Apple (and others) allways tried to lock you in without the option for transporting your data to competitors.

No one wants to hear about your recent STD's but if they do, you know why this should have been only your private part/information.
[automerge]1579961138[/automerge]

Healthcare is a mess. I would love for Apple to be able to help straighten it out, but I would be truly surprised if they can do that.

Healthcare is cautious, conservative, transparent, not wanting to harm you..