Apple's Beats brand in April unveiled the Powerbeats Pro, a redesigned wire-free version of its popular fitness-oriented Powerbeats earbuds.
First U.S. Jury Trial Begins Today in Apple-Qualcomm Legal Battle
In July 2017, Qualcomm filed suit against Apple in San Diego federal court, accusing the iPhone maker of infringing on six U.S. patents related to graphics processing architecture, power consumption, and envelope tracking technologies. Nearly two years later, the case is finally headed to trial.
The trial begins today with jury selection, with proceedings expected to take up to two weeks. It will be the first time a U.S. jury is involved in the major legal battle between the two companies, according to Bloomberg.
The legal battle between Apple and Qualcomm spans multiple countries. The dispute began in January 2017 when Apple sued Qualcomm for an alleged $1 billion in unpaid royalty rebates, just days after an FTC complaint alleged that Qualcomm engaged in anticompetitive patent licensing practices.
Qualcomm has countersued, alleging that its "innovations are at the heart of every iPhone" and "enable the most important uses and features of those devices," adding that it "simply is untrue that Qualcomm is seeking to collect royalties for Apple innovations that have nothing to do with Qualcomm's technology."
Last week, analysts at investment bank Barclays said that Qualcomm is seemingly "running out" of time to reach a settlement with Apple if it wants to win 5G modems orders for the first 5G-enabled iPhones, expected in 2020.
The trial begins today with jury selection, with proceedings expected to take up to two weeks. It will be the first time a U.S. jury is involved in the major legal battle between the two companies, according to Bloomberg.
The legal battle between Apple and Qualcomm spans multiple countries. The dispute began in January 2017 when Apple sued Qualcomm for an alleged $1 billion in unpaid royalty rebates, just days after an FTC complaint alleged that Qualcomm engaged in anticompetitive patent licensing practices.
Qualcomm has countersued, alleging that its "innovations are at the heart of every iPhone" and "enable the most important uses and features of those devices," adding that it "simply is untrue that Qualcomm is seeking to collect royalties for Apple innovations that have nothing to do with Qualcomm's technology."
Last week, analysts at investment bank Barclays said that Qualcomm is seemingly "running out" of time to reach a settlement with Apple if it wants to win 5G modems orders for the first 5G-enabled iPhones, expected in 2020.
[ 40 comments ]
Top Rated Comments
(View all)
6 weeks ago
Is it just me, or is this pointless.
Pointless time and money wasting. With all that what will go to it, they could build a few hospitals instead and actually being useful.
6 weeks ago
These companies could have both saved so much money if they had just been able to compromise.
Since when has Apple ever compromised?
[doublepost=1551736919][/doublepost]
Except that if Qualcomm wins then iPhone cost more. You have it backwards.
Apple hasn't been paying Qualcomm royalties for 2 years, yet the prices of their phones haven't decreased.
6 weeks ago
What’s the chance that they will actually get a jury that is capable of following what I’m sure will be detailed explanations using technical terms of various patents. I’d hate to be involved!
6 weeks ago
These companies could have both saved so much money if they had just been able to compromise.
6 weeks ago
What’s your point exactly? You are seriously claiming that apple will raise prices if they beat Qualcomm? Because that’s where this conversation began. That’s a lame theory.
Of course they will raise prices, they'll do that anyway. And if they beat Qualcomm they get to keep even more of that increased price as profit.
6 weeks ago
Wait, Qualcomm is suing Apple yet wants a purchase order from them in future iPhones? Lol
6 weeks ago
The good news is that I'll bet there are more jurors using Apple phones than Qualcomm phones ;), and I'll bet that the perception of Apple is more positive than Qualcomm. If that is not the case then Apple's marketing money is not being very well spent. I think going to a jury is bad for Qualcomm.
Nice insight in your legal understanding
6 weeks ago
These companies could have both saved so much money if they had just been able to compromise.
Tim doesn't pay his bills or taxes until he has a court judgement demanding he does
[ Read All Comments ]
Cozy, a company that has a variety of clever solutions for managing Apple accessories, recently released its latest product, a whimsical "Drink Different" ice cube tray that makes ice shaped...
Apple has expanded mobile phone billing to additional countries and carriers, according to an updated support document on its website.
As of this week, the feature is now supported by...
Facebook harvested the email contacts of 1.5 million users without their knowledge or consent and used the data to build a web of their social connections, it emerged today. Business Insider reports...
Ahead of the annual New York International Auto Show, several automakers have announced new vehicles with first-time support for CarPlay, including the 2020 Toyota Highlander, 2020 Nissan Versa, and...
Amazon Echo devices have been able to use Alexa-based voice commands to control Apple Music since December, but the feature has been limited to Amazon's own devices until today.
Sonos One...
Apple today released a new update for Safari Technology Preview, the experimental browser Apple first introduced three years ago in March 2016. Apple designed the Safari Technology Preview to test...
Apple Pay is now available as a payment option in the Uber Eats food delivery app for the first time, allowing users who make food orders to pay with a credit or debit card stored in the Wallet app.
...
Sleep tracking has become a popular activity for many people, since the practice can result in major benefits to your daily wellbeing, restfulness, stress levels, and mental health. There are many...
