'Bash' Security Flaw in OS X Allows for Malicious Attacks on Devices and Services - MacRumors
Skip to Content

'Bash' Security Flaw in OS X Allows for Malicious Attacks on Devices and Services

terminalicon2 Security researchers from Red Hat have uncovered a new exploit in the common "Bash" command shell found in OS X and Linux which can be used to deploy malicious code with minimal effort. Due to the ubiquity of the Bash shell, the exploit can affect a wide variety of different web-connected devices and properties, including unsecured websites, smart home appliances, servers, and more.

Security researcher Robert Graham noted on his blog that the Bash exploit is "as big as Heartbleed," referring to the flaw discovered earlier this year in the popular OpenSSL software which secures connections between clients and servers:

Internet-of-things devices like video cameras are especially vulnerable because a lot of their software is built from web-enabled bash scripts. Thus, not only are they less likely to be patched, they are more likely to expose the vulnerability to the outside world.

Unlike Heartbleed, which only affected a specific version of OpenSSL, this bash bug has been around for a long, long time. That means there are lots of old devices on the network vulnerable to this bug. The number of systems needing to be patched, but which won't be, is much larger than Heartbleed.

Heartbleed was said to have affected 66% of the Internet, although Apple announced in April that the exploit did not affect its software or "key services." Apple also released updates for the AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule to better secure both web devices against Heartbleed.

A topic discussing the Bash exploit on StackExchange also notes that Apple did not include a fix for the bug in its latest round of security updates that came alongside the release of OS X Mavericks 10.9.5 last week. It is possible however that Apple will release a fix for OS X in the near future to address the exploit, similar to what it has done for other security issues in the past.

Popular Stories

All Screen iPhone 2030 Feature Sans Text

iPhone 18 Pro: Nine Reasons Not to Upgrade This Year

Monday September 7, 2026 5:01 am PDT by
Apple is set to unveil new iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max models on Wednesday, September 9, and the devices are expected to feature a design that's largely similar to the iPhone 17 Pro models, with a peppering of enhancements inside. Major changes are not expected until next year, when Apple is expected to introduce a radically redesigned 20th-anniversary iPhone. If you're thinking of...
iPhone 18 Pro Dark Cherry Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Reportedly Starts With 256GB of Storage

Thursday September 3, 2026 9:22 am PDT by
While the iPhone 17 Pro has double the base storage compared to the iPhone 16 Pro, there will apparently be no further increase this year. Taiwanese research firm TrendForce today again reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models will start with 256GB of storage, like the iPhone 17 Pro models. Minimum storage capacities by model:iPhone 16 Pro: 128GB iPhone 17 Pro: 256GB iPhone 18 Pro...
Foldable iPhone Ultra Still Likely to Be Missing These Five Features 16x9 1

Foldable 'iPhone Ultra' Still Likely to Be Missing These Five Features

Friday September 4, 2026 3:00 pm PDT by
Apple's first foldable iPhone, dubbed the "iPhone Ultra," is expected to launch without at least four features that will be present on the iPhone 18 Pro models, despite a price tag of at least $2,000. The iPhone Air lacks Ultra Wide and Telephoto rear cameras, a SIM card slot, and stereo speakers. With a super thin design, a titanium frame, and a glass back, the iPhone Ultra is expected to ...

Top Rated Comments

Eweie Avatar
156 months ago
strike three. you're out...
now what?
*still waiting for iPhone + Apple Watch*
*facepalm* you people don't know what bash is do you. this has nothing to do with apple.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
156 months ago
Always interesting to find out that a security bug like this has been around for years and no one knew about it until just now.

If only Bash would have been open source so people could search bugs in the source code


/s
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
156 months ago
No, as far as I have seen so far the first initial patch didn't actually fix the problem. The fact is that the bug was publicly disclosed yesterday, and you are ranting because there is no patch today, as of yet.
The bug is fixed. The patch is available. Apple could have rolled it out by now.

The GNU people even were so nice to backport the fixes to the ancient version Apple is using because Apple doesn't want code that's licensed with GPL v3.

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/bash32-052

Apple just has to apply the patch and provide a new bash binary through software update. Apple does not have to identify the bug, they don't have to come up with a solution, they don't have to verify the fix. Everything is done already.

Stupid politics are the only thing that prevent the release of this bugfix. Probably because they like to bundle patches so people think their software is more secure because it isn't patched that often.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Slix Avatar
156 months ago
Always interesting to find out that a security bug like this has been around for years and no one knew about it until just now.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
156 months ago
- iCloud hacks
Last month.


- iOS 8 issues
- iOS 8.0.1 issues
Ok.


- Bentgate
Physics.


- HealthKit issues
Part of 'iOS 8 issues'.


- iPhone 6 RAM issues
Not an issue at all, just some idiots who think RAM is free.


- Free U2 Album issues
Weeks ago.


- Restricted NFC chip
Not an issue, just a business decision that not everyone agrees with.


- Keynote streaming issues
Weeks ago. (Though otherwise valid.)


So yeah, not too bad at all.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
156 months ago
Relax, people, the sky is not falling.

This problem primarily affects things running a (web) server.

Your home Mac might technically be affected, but you're likely not running anything that exposes the bug to an attacker.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)