NewImageNuance, the company that makes some of the voice recognition technology behind Apple's Siri, has adopted a 'poison pill' measure to deter any possible takeover attempts. Activist investor Carl Icahn, who recently bought more than $1 billion worth of Apple stock, also owns 16% of Nuance.

Icahn is famous for putting pressure on companies that he invests in, and some believe he could press Apple to purchase Nuance.

He has been publicly calling for Apple to dramatically increase its share repurchase program since he invested in the company.

Shareholder rights plans -- often called a 'poison pill' -- are a defensive tactic used by corporations to ward off unwanted takeovers. In Nuance's case, the company will allow shareholders to purchase additional shares of stock, thus diluting the whole stock pool, if any one investor holds more than 20 percent of the company. Icahn currently holds 16 percent of Nuance.

Nuance Communications, Inc. today announced that its Board of Directors has adopted a stockholder rights plan. Under the Rights Plan, stockholders of record at the close of business on August 29, 2013 will receive one right for each share of Nuance common stock held on that date. Initially, these rights will not be exercisable and will trade with the shares of Nuance common stock. If the rights become exercisable, each right will entitle stockholders to buy one one-thousandth of a share of a new series of participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $87.00 per right. The Rights Plan expires on August 19, 2014.

The Rights Plan is intended to enable all Nuance stockholders to realize the long-term value of their investment in Nuance. It is also designed to reduce the likelihood that any person or group would gain control of Nuance through open market accumulation or other coercive takeover tactics without paying an appropriate control premium. The Rights Plan was not adopted in response to any current effort to acquire control of Nuance.

The rights will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires 20% or more of Nuance’s common stock in a transaction not approved by Nuance’s Board of Directors.

Top Rated Comments

Technarchy Avatar
140 months ago
Force collective share buyback through cooperation with other major shareholders. Once Apple starts buying back shares, it's non voting stock -- his percentage of voting weight therefore automatically increases. Considering how much cash reserve Apple has, shareholders could hypothetically push Apple to dump most of it on stock buyback. Icahn would win big profits-wise, and also increase his voting stake in the company significantly.

After that, Icahn has more money to buy more shares. Then Icahn could do what he always does -- put himself on the board, milk the company for a quick buck, then break down and sell the company in parts.

Sounds like a lovely human being...
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
darkplanets Avatar
140 months ago
He owns 1% of Apple. How could he put any effective pressure on the company?

Force collective share buyback through cooperation with other major shareholders. Once Apple starts buying back shares, it's non voting stock -- his percentage of voting weight therefore automatically increases. Considering how much cash reserve Apple has, shareholders could hypothetically push Apple to dump most of it on stock buyback. Icahn would win big profits-wise, and also increase his voting stake in the company significantly.

After that, Icahn has more money to buy more shares. Then Icahn could do what he always does -- put himself on the board, milk the company for a quick buck, then break down and sell the company in parts.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Braniff747SP Avatar
140 months ago
Sounds like a lovely human being...


He was instrumental in the demise of TWA, so he definitely isn't on my favorites list.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Makosuke Avatar
140 months ago
Guys like Icahn force the ownership to focus on the stockholders. In some cases he buys a majority share and the stockholders become HIM, but the other stockholders make out nicely.
The points you make about executive excess and the value of "corporate maggots" are valid, but it's worth noting that "what's best for the stockholders" is often a very short-term and narrow view, because stockholders are fickle and easily swayed by short-term fluctuations in stock price that have no real meaning in terms of actual corporate health or the value of the corporation for society as a whole.

Phrased differently, if you're a shareholder, you want to see your shares increase in value steadily and constantly, or see a steady stream of dividends. If there's a bump, you as a shareholder might, in your own short-term best interest, attempt to get the company to do something to increase its stock value. Viewed in the long term, however, that short-term gain might be disastrous, while the dip might be part of a large-scale plan that will take years to play out.

Case in point: Way back when, in the early Steve Jobs return era around Y2K, Apple stock skyrocketed to around $30 in modern share terms (prior to a couple of splits, so it was $120 at the time if memory serves). A bit later, it crashed for no particularly good reason to about a quarter of that and stayed there for over two years.

If you're a shareholder with a lot of control over the company, you might freak out after two years of this "mismanagement" and fire the CEO (Steve Jobs) and the guys under him, because between 2001 and 2003 the stock you payed $120 a share for is STILL only worth a quarter of that, so they obviously must be incompetent.

In reality, that period was the start of the iPod era and a long term plan that turned the company into the largest and most profitable company in the world, and (if you sold at the 2012 peak) would have given you a 2,500% return on investment (or, if you had bought in at the bottom, a ~10,000% increase). A period during which the shareholders were almost completely ignored, and there were almost no executive changes.

This isn't to say that shareholders are always wrong--there are PLENTY of overpaid, overconfident, incompetent CEOs in the world--but what is best for them is not always what's best for the company. Or, ironically, even what's best for them if they're long term investors.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Gasu E. Avatar
140 months ago
Sounds like a lovely human being...

I'm not sure guys like Icahn are such a bad thing. Large company executives often run the company as much for their own benefit as for the benefit of the stockholders. You guys all know this-- one of the symptoms is the excessive amount so many CEOs pay themselves. The only way to mitigate this is stockholder pressure. Unfortunately in many cases outside ownership is too diffuse to have any real power. Guys like Icahn force the ownership to focus on the stockholders. In some cases he buys a majority share and the stockholders become HIM, but the other stockholders make out nicely.

Someone mentioned LBOs, but Icahn has made hundreds of investments and only a few have been LBOs. Generally these were sick companies that held on too long or were badly mismanaged. Sometimes the best thing to do with a big company is to return the value to the stockholders, fire the execs and sell the assets to someone who can use them more productively, actually creating more jobs in the process.

Icahn is not altruistic and is not a nice man. Sometime the execs choose to pay him to leave, rather than fix the problems caused by their own incompetence and give up their own perks. He gladly takes this money! But the problem should be laid on the execs, not Icahn.

Guys like Icahn are rightfully considered to be the maggots or vultures of capitalism. Like maggots, they are ugly. But they also recycle dead flesh into useful elements that can be recycled into new growth.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ValSalva Avatar
140 months ago
Though Icahn has been infamously know for such reputation, I think he. bought Apple stock solely for profiteering.

Well yes. Everything Icahn does is for profit. It's just how he makes his profit that can sometimes be destructive. He can't destroy Apple because it's too big even for him. But if he could destroy Apple for a profit he would in a heartbeat.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iphone se 4 modified flag edges

When to Expect the Next iPhone SE to Launch

Friday May 17, 2024 2:03 pm PDT by
It has been over two years since Apple released the third-generation iPhone SE, and rumors continue to surface about a new model. The latest word comes from The Information, which today reported that Apple plans to release a new iPhone SE with a design similar to the standard iPhone 14 in the spring of 2025. If this rumor is accurate, the iPhone SE would finally gain Face ID and a notch...
iOS 17

iOS 17.5 Bug May Also Resurface Deleted Photos on Wiped, Sold Devices [Updated]

Friday May 17, 2024 12:24 pm PDT by
A bug in iOS 17.5 is apparently causing photos that have been deleted to reappear, and the issue seems to impact even iPhones and iPads that have been erased and sold off to other people. A Reddit user wiped an iPad following Apple's guidelines in September of 2023 before selling it off to a friend. That friend updated the iPad to iPadOS 17.5 this week, and began seeing the Reddit user's old ...
iphone se 4 modified flag edges

iPhone SE 4 With Face ID Said to Be Priced Below $500

Monday May 20, 2024 3:43 am PDT by
Apple is targeting a sub-$500 starting price for its upcoming fourth-generation iPhone SE model despite a raft of rumored upgrades coming to the more affordable device. According to leaker Revegnus on X, the U.S. launch price of the fourth-generation iPhone SE will either remain at the same $429 starting price as the current model, or will see an increase of around 10%. Either way, Apple's...
iOS 17

Apple Releases iOS 17.5.1 With Fix for Reappearing Photos Bug

Monday May 20, 2024 10:11 am PDT by
Apple today released iOS 17.5.1 and iPadOS 17.5.1, minor updates to the iOS 17 and iPadOS 17 operating system updates that came out last September. The 17.5.1 updates come a week after the launch of iOS 17.5 and iPadOS 17.5. iOS 17.5.1 and iPadOS 17.5.1 can be downloaded on eligible iPhones and iPads over-the-air by going to Settings > General > Software Update. According to Apple's...
iPhone 16 Camera Lozenge 2 Perspective

iPhone 16 Lineup Rumored to Come in These Two New Colors

Sunday May 19, 2024 11:08 am PDT by
Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo today outlined his expectations for the iPhone 16 lineup's color options, revealing that two new colors should replace two of the existing shades. Kuo outlined his expectations in a post on X (formerly Twitter) earlier today. He believes that the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max will be available in black, white or silver, gray or "Natural Titanium," and rose....
oled m4 ipad pro grainy display reports

OLED iPad Pro Users Report 'Grainy' Displays, But It May Not Be a Defect

Friday May 17, 2024 5:57 am PDT by
Some new M4 iPad Pro models are exhibiting a visible static grain pattern across the OLED display, according to several user reports on Reddit (1, 2, 3) and the MacRumors Forums. Image credit: MacRumors user bk215 Users who see the grain generally report that it is most noticeable in dark environments with the display set at a low to medium brightness while viewing content with gray or muted...