Apple's Beats brand in April unveiled the Powerbeats Pro, a redesigned wire-free version of its popular fitness-oriented Powerbeats earbuds.
Proview Sues Apple in U.S. Over Alleged Deception in iPad Trademark Purchase
Reuters reports that the dispute over the iPad trademark in China has taken an interesting turn, with Proview Technology filing suit against Apple in the United States over alleged deception related to the deal between the two companies.
Apple set up a dummy corporation known as IP Application Development Ltd (IPAD) to conduct negotiations with Proview over the trademark back in 2009, and Proview's suit alleges that Apple's efforts to keep its identity secret amounted to fraud.
MacRumors discovered in the weeks leading up to the introduction of the original iPad in January 2010 that Apple had used a similar dummy corporation with a nearly identical name of IP Application Development LLC to register its own iPad trademarks.
Apple claims that its IPAD dummy corporation purchased the rights to the iPad trademark from Proview in ten countries back in December 2009. Proview has claimed that the transaction did not include the Chinese rights, and the two companies are currently facing off in a number of Chinese courts over the matter. A Hong Kong court ruled last year that Proview and several of its subsidiaries and associated companies had conspired to extort millions of dollars of Apple's by refusing to turn over the Chinese rights to the trademark, but Chinese courts have in several cases sided with Proview.
Apple set up a dummy corporation known as IP Application Development Ltd (IPAD) to conduct negotiations with Proview over the trademark back in 2009, and Proview's suit alleges that Apple's efforts to keep its identity secret amounted to fraud.
In its filing, Proview alleged lawyers for IPAD repeatedly said it would not be competing with the Chinese firm, and refused to say why they needed the trademark.The use of dummy corporations is not particularly unusual in business negotiations, with companies sometimes seeking to keep their identities secret as they work to acquire intellectual property and other assets in support of products under development. By keeping their identities secret, high-profile companies hope to avoid having their plans become public while also looking to strike more favorable deals with companies who think they are dealing with a small business rather than a deep-pocketed industry leader.
Those representations were made "with the intent to defraud and induce the plaintiffs to enter into the agreement," Proview said in the filing dated February 17, requesting an unspecified amount of damages.
MacRumors discovered in the weeks leading up to the introduction of the original iPad in January 2010 that Apple had used a similar dummy corporation with a nearly identical name of IP Application Development LLC to register its own iPad trademarks.
Apple claims that its IPAD dummy corporation purchased the rights to the iPad trademark from Proview in ten countries back in December 2009. Proview has claimed that the transaction did not include the Chinese rights, and the two companies are currently facing off in a number of Chinese courts over the matter. A Hong Kong court ruled last year that Proview and several of its subsidiaries and associated companies had conspired to extort millions of dollars of Apple's by refusing to turn over the Chinese rights to the trademark, but Chinese courts have in several cases sided with Proview.
Related Roundup: iPad
Tag: Proview Technology
Buyer's Guide: iPad (Don't Buy)
[ 159 comments ]
Top Rated Comments
(View all)
95 months ago
Huh?
Companies are not obligated to explain why they want to buy the trademarks and if Proview had doubts, they could've say no to the deals.
Also, Proview had no tablets, so Apple is not competing against them.
This is just a scare tactic to try to get Apple to pay up.
Companies are not obligated to explain why they want to buy the trademarks and if Proview had doubts, they could've say no to the deals.
Also, Proview had no tablets, so Apple is not competing against them.
This is just a scare tactic to try to get Apple to pay up.
95 months ago
well in the UK apple will have a hard time having a tv named itv
Luckily apple doesn't make a product called "iTV"
95 months ago
And the shameless hypocrisy continues. Please Apple just pay what you should pay in good faith already. You try to sue Samsung and others at every turn, but you blatantly use someone else's trademark and for whatever reason, you feel you shouldn't have to pay. But everyone else owes you everything right? I've got a nice tall glass of ethics and morals on the table for you. Come take nice big soul cleansing swig.
Absolutely despicable and shameless.
What the hell are you talking about? Apple is under no obligation to pay more than it agreed to pay.
95 months ago
And the shameless hypocrisy continues. Please Apple just pay what you should pay in good faith already. You try to sue Samsung and others at every turn, but you blatantly use someone else's trademark and for whatever reason, you feel you shouldn't have to pay. But everyone else owes you everything right? I've got a nice tall glass of ethics and morals on the table for you. Come take nice big soul cleansing swig.
Absolutely despicable and shameless.
I gather you haven't read the documents provided in this discussion.
95 months ago
And the shameless hypocrisy continues. Please Apple just pay what you should pay in good faith already. You try to sue Samsung and others at every turn, but you blatantly use someone else's trademark and for whatever reason, you feel you shouldn't have to pay. But everyone else owes you everything right? I've got a nice tall glass of ethics and morals on the table for you. Come take nice big soul cleansing swig.
Absolutely despicable and shameless.
Proview (China) signed the deal. Apple has proof and that is why they won in HK. Thanks MikhailT for the link (http://allthingsd.com/20120216/take-a-look-at-some-of-apples-evidence-in-proview-ipad-dispute/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_ticker).
95 months ago
"Proview's suit alleges that Apple's efforts to keep its identity secret amounted to fraud."
Translation: "We should have asked for a lot more money."
Translation: "We should have asked for a lot more money."
95 months ago
And the shameless hypocrisy continues. Please Apple just pay what you should pay in good faith already.
Proview was paid what Proview asked for the rights, which they said included China. They are the ones that are acting in bad faith, not Apple. So they deserve nothing and should get nothing.
The only reason that Apple doesn't 'own' the trademark on the books is because Proview is refusing to honor a signed and paid deal and transferring the 'ownership'.
It would be like if you owned a car and I offered to buy it from you and we sent a deal, even put it on paper and I gave you the money you asked for. But then you found out that I had just won the lotto and felt that I should have paid you more so you refuse to file the paperwork to transfer the registration.
95 months ago
Sneaky, sneaky Apple!!
Frankly, it was deceptive- Whether it was fair game or not, or more importantly in this case- legal or not- is another question entirely. But I would be upset if I thought I was dealing with a small company and it turned out to be a famous and huge international corporation, that's for sure.
Why should they upset. They got their asking price. I'm sure they were happy with it at the time of sale.
[ Read All Comments ]
In iOS 13, Apple has extended the system's built-in screenshot feature to include the ability to save a full web page as a multi-page PDF.
Don't expect this option to appear when...
For this week's giveaway, we've teamed up with Twelve South to offer MacRumors readers a chance to win a prize pack that includes a BookBook vol. 2 for iPad Pro, an AirFly, and a set of...
O2 has became the latest network carrier in the United Kingdom to offer the cellular version of the Apple Watch Series 4. iPhone users can now order the LTE-enabled smartwatch through the O2 website,...
Unsolicited phone calls can become a regular annoyance and even a cause of stress for many smartphone users these days. Thankfully, Apple provides a feature in iOS 13 that can automatically silence...
The Iconfactory today announced it has released a significant update to its popular third-party Twitter client Twitterrific for iPhone and iPad. The latest version of the app contains over 50 new...
Apple yesterday released a new update for Safari Technology Preview, the experimental browser Apple first introduced three years ago in March 2016. Apple designed the Safari Technology Preview to...
Amazon and B&H Photo are discounting the latest versions of Apple's iPad Air this week, with each configuration of the tablet receiving a new all-time-low price tag. Amazon offers the largest...
Spotify today announced a new version of the "Your Library" tab in its mobile apps for iOS and Android, which is "designed to get you to the content you want faster." This update is...
