Skip to Content

U.S. Senators Ask Apple and Google to Remove X and Grok Apps Over Sexualized Image Generation

In a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, U.S. Senators Ron Wyden, Ben Ray Lujan, and Edward Markey have requested that Apple and Google remove X Corp's X and Grok apps from their app stores over recent incidents of "mass generation of nonconsensual sexualized images of women and children."

grok logo purple gradient
X has come under fire over the past week amid reports of Grok's AI image generation capabilities being used to create images depicting women and children in bikinis or underwear. In response, X appears to have scaled back the ability for Grok to generate images in response to X posts by non-paying users, but The Verge notes that the tools remain available to paying subscribers and through the dedicated Grok tab in the X and in the standalone Grok app.

The senators argue that the "harmful and likely illegal depictions" are in violation of Apple's and Google's app store terms and that the two companies must remove the apps until the policy violations are addressed.

. . . Apple's terms of service bar apps from including "offensive" or "just plain creepy" content, which under any definition must include nonconsensually-generated sexualized images of children and women. Further, Apple's terms explicitly bar apps from including content that is "[o]vertly sexual or pornographic material" including material "intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings."

Turning a blind eye to X's egregious behavior would make a mockery of your moderation practices. Indeed, not taking action would undermine your claims in public and in court that your app stores offer a safer user experience than letting users download apps directly to their phones. This principle has been core to your advocacy against legislative reforms to increase app store competition and your defenses to claims that your app stores abuse their market power through their payment systems.

The senators request a written response to their letter by January 23.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Tags: Google, Grok

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
imac video apple feature

Apple Unveils Two New Products

Monday March 2, 2026 7:49 am PST by
Apple today introduced two new devices, including the iPhone 17e and an updated iPad Air. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's A19 chip, MagSafe for magnetic wireless charging and magnetic accessories, Apple's second-generation C1X modem for faster 5G, and a doubled 256GB of base storage. In the U.S., the iPhone 17e starts at $599, just like the ...

Top Rated Comments

jarman92 Avatar
8 weeks ago

Of course, corrupt government officials don't want any light to shine through X.
You consider naked images of children "light?"


Safari and the web in general are far worse.
"QUICK, LOOK OVER THERE!"


But that does not retaliate agains DOGE findings.
What "DOGE findings?" That nonsense was disbanded months ago after accomplishing nothing but wanton destruction while somehow costing billions of dollars.


Hopefully American's will see this for what it really is.
Indeed.
Score: 70 Votes (Like | Disagree)
turbineseaplane Avatar
8 weeks ago
Apps that allow you to interact with phrases like "undress this woman" or "show me underage naked girls" do not belong in the Apple App Store.

If Apple won't act on this, I don't want to hear any defenses of the walled garden and their App Review and/or curation.

None.

If you don't root out this level of horrendous you have zero ground to stand on.
Score: 68 Votes (Like | Disagree)
turbineseaplane Avatar
8 weeks ago
It says so much about Elon Musk that he hasn't reined this in.
Score: 68 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 weeks ago
It’s insane to me there’s even a debate whether to ban Elon’s CSAM machine.

This should not be difficult.
Score: 54 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheDailyApple Avatar
8 weeks ago
I remember when corporations at least tried to follow mottos like “don’t be evil.”
Score: 48 Votes (Like | Disagree)
turbineseaplane Avatar
8 weeks ago

I agree that Apple should act on this, but Congress isn't acting either, so getting rid of the walled garden would probably just make the problem worse, not better.
That's a strawman here.

The point is that Apple has rules for their store and they need to enforce them.

If they don't, everything else they say on these topics is absolutely rubbish.

If people want to do engage with awful stuff, sourced from wherever they want, that's up to them.

Apple shouldn't be HOSTING & distributing the Apps!!

Guys - this is not hard.
Score: 38 Votes (Like | Disagree)