Apple Now Spends Over $8 Million Lobbying the EU Annually

Apple spent more money lobbying EU officials in 2025 than in any previous year, according to a new dataset from Corporate Europe Observatory, which reports that Apple now allocates roughly €7 million ($8.2 million) annually to influence European regulation.

european commission
Apple is identified by the report as one of the ten largest tech-sector lobby spenders in Europe. Those ten companies together account for €49 million of digital-industry lobbying out of a total €151 million recorded in the EU Transparency Register for 2025. Apple previously disclosed spending between €3.5 million and €3.75 million per year in 2021, revealing a near-doubling of declared expenditure within four years.

The report attributes the increase to ongoing EU regulatory activity targeting large American technology firms, including the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, AI Act, and GDPR enforcement. The research notes that Apple participated in 29 formal meetings with high-level European Commission officials between January and June 2025. Amazon recorded 43 meetings in the same window, Microsoft 36, Google 35, and Meta 27.

Artificial intelligence policy was the most frequent topic of Commission-level discussions in the period. According to the meeting minutes, AI was referenced in 58 of the 146 logged meetings with the five largest U.S. tech companies. Other files that Apple and peers lobbied on include data centers and cloud infrastructure (23 meetings), the Digital Services Act (17), the Digital Markets Act (16), and the forthcoming Digital Fairness Act (16).

Apple also engaged with members of the European Parliament. The dataset records 232 meetings between MEPs and the five largest U.S. tech firms in the first six months of 2025. Apple was present at 47 of those interactions. Meta held 63, Amazon 49, Google 47, and Microsoft 34.

Corporate Europe Observatory further attributes €2.3 million of Apple expenditure to consultancy contracts, covering lobbying agencies, PR firms, and third-party research entities. In the same category, Amazon spent €2.84 million and Meta €1.5 million.

Multiple Brussels-based think tanks, including Bruegel, Centre for European Reform, Centre for European Policy Studies, and Centre on Regulation in Europe, now list ongoing financial support from all five U.S. Big Tech firms.

Apple's higher spending comes at a time when EU digital rules are tightening. Its move into the top tier of lobby spenders therefore tracks the fact that Apple now has direct financial and product exposure to every major EU tech issue currently on the table.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

maxresdefault

Apple Shows Off a Key Reason to Upgrade to the iPhone 17

Saturday February 7, 2026 9:26 am PST by
Apple today shared an ad that shows how the upgraded Center Stage front camera on the latest iPhones improves the process of taking a group selfie. "Watch how the new front facing camera on iPhone 17 Pro takes group selfies that automatically expand and rotate as more people come into frame," says Apple. While the ad is focused on the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, the regular iPhone...
Finder Siri Feature

Why Apple's iOS 26.4 Siri Upgrade Will Be Bigger Than Originally Promised

Friday February 6, 2026 3:06 pm PST by
In the iOS 26.4 update that's coming this spring, Apple will introduce a new version of Siri that's going to overhaul how we interact with the personal assistant and what it's able to do. The iOS 26.4 version of Siri won't work like ChatGPT or Claude, but it will rely on large language models (LLMs) and has been updated from the ground up. Upgraded Architecture The next-generation...
wwdc sans text feature

Apple Rumored to Announce New Product on February 19

Thursday February 5, 2026 12:22 pm PST by
Apple plans to announce the iPhone 17e on Thursday, February 19, according to Macwelt, the German equivalent of Macworld. The report, citing industry sources, is available in English on Macworld. Apple announced the iPhone 16e on Wednesday, February 19 last year, so the iPhone 17e would be unveiled exactly one year later if this rumor is accurate. It is quite uncommon for Apple to unveil...
apple wallet drivers license feature iPhone 15 pro

Apple Says These 7 U.S. States Plan to Offer iPhone Driver's Licenses

Monday February 9, 2026 6:24 am PST by
In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps. The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future. To set up the...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

New MacBook Pros Could Now Arrive in March

Sunday February 8, 2026 6:02 am PST by
New MacBook Pro models with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips could arrive as soon as Monday, March 2, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that the release of new MacBook Pro models is tied to the release of macOS Tahoe 26.3. The launch is said to be slated for as early as the week of March 2. He added that the M4 Pro and M4 Max models on sale today...

Top Rated Comments

dcingie Avatar
15 weeks ago
Lobbying should be completely illegal. It’s wild we allow any company to bribe elected officials.
Score: 36 Votes (Like | Disagree)
neuropsychguy Avatar
15 weeks ago

Lobbying should be completely illegal. It’s wild we allow any company to bribe elected officials.
Bribery is the exchange of money or favors to influence an official’s decision—illegal almost everywhere. Lobbying is communicating with an elected official to share views or information. When you call or email your representative, you’re lobbying! It can be paid or unpaid, and in most places it’s legal but regulated (e.g., disclosure rules, gift limits, etc.).

If lobbying were illegal: 1) constituents couldn’t contact their representatives, 2) subject-matter experts (including in business, medicine, academia, and advocacy) couldn’t offer input, 3) lawmakers would legislate with less real-world information.

This is why bribery, which corrupts decisions and is banned, but lobbying is not. Lobbying informs decisions and is permitted—within rules—to keep government officials responsive and better-informed.

Edited: To make this a little clearer and to add a personal example.

Some years back I was went with a group of patients and experts (I was one) to visit some representatives in Washington D.C. We were "advocating" for more NIH funding of research into a particular disease/diagnosis. This was a one-time thing and I wasn't paid, but my travel expenses were reimbursed by the organization I was representing. This was lobbying.

I had an opportunity to talk briefly about my research and why more NIH funding could be beneficial. Was this "good" lobbying? It depends on what your view of NIH funding is. Should it increase? If so, then my lobbying was "good". Should it decrease? If so, then my lobbying was "bad". How good or bad it is depends on personal opinion about what's being lobbied for or against.

So maybe only corporations should be banned from having lobbyists? What's the definition of a corporation? What if a government is looking at passing a law or passes a law that harms businesses? Should a business have to go through the legal system after laws are passed and have no other recourse (i.e., a way to prevent 'bad' laws)? What if a law harms both businesses and consumers? Businesses should not be able to contact (lobby) elected officials on behalf of businesses and consumers?

These are not just hypotheticals. This is the nature of lobbying. It ranges from individuals contacting representatives to full-time paid lobbyists. So maybe no paid lobbyists? That limitation comes with its own problems (e.g., only retired or wealthy people could lobby, for example). Banning it would, at least in the United States, potentially be against the First Amendment.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
vantelimus Avatar
15 weeks ago

.2% of their 4t company value
You are only off by three orders of magnitude. It is .000225%, roughly the same as the person making $150k spending 34 cents.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
15 weeks ago

Probably because only American tech companies are considered gate keepers on the DMA, there are no EU companies. I think the DSA and AI Act (don’t know as much about these) also heavily focus on limiting American tech. The only broad act that effects everyone equally is the GDPR and all the horrible cookie bars we now have because of it.

I could be wrong though. Maybe there is a non-American company on the DMA gatekeeper list.
Bytedance is a gatekeeper, and is neither American nor European.

Booking.com is a gatekeeper and is a Dutch company.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
munpip214 Avatar
15 weeks ago
That’s pennies to Apple. Surprised it isn’t more.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
whatnot Avatar
15 weeks ago
hopefully to no effect.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)