Apple Saves $300 Million After Appeals Court Win in LTE Patent Fight

Apple today won a victory in its ongoing patent infringement litigation with Texas-based patent troll Optis, reports Reuters.

iphone 16 pro purple
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit today threw out a prior jury verdict that would have forced Apple to pay $300 million for infringing on standard-essential LTE patents owned by Optis.

When appealing the initial ruling from the Eastern District Court of Texas, Apple argued that the court had not fairly separated the different patent claims that it allegedly violated, and only asked the jurors to determine if Apple violated any patents. The federal appeals court agreed with Apple, and said that the district court ruling provided incorrect jury instructions and violated Apple's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial on each patent infringement claim.

Apple and Optis will now return to court for another jury trial in the Eastern District of Texas. In a statement, Optis said it believes it will ultimately receive fair compensation from the court.

We remain highly confident the Court will establish fair compensation for the critical Optis patents that enable high-speed connectivity for millions of Apple devices. Nothing in this decision challenges the fundamental facts, which demonstrate that Apple is infringing Optis patents and permit a new trial on damages. No patents were found to be invalid by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

The legal fight between Apple and Optis kicked off in 2019, when Optis claimed that Apple violated LTE patents owned by Optis. Optis was initially awarded $506 million in a 2020 trial, but after appeal, the damages were thrown out because Optis is required to license standard-essential patents under fair and reasonable terms and $506 million did not meet that obligation.

The $300 million award that was thrown out today was the result of a second jury trial in 2021 that also found in Optis' favor. As a patent holding company, Optis does not manufacture products, instead going after tech companies that may violate the patent portfolio that it owns.

Optis also filed infringement claims against Apple in the UK, and in May 2025, Apple was ordered to pay $502 million plus interest after it was found to have violated Optis' UK wireless patents. Apple is also appealing that ruling.

Popular Stories

iOS 26 Feature

iOS 26.1 to iOS 26.4 Will Add These New Features to Your iPhone

Wednesday October 1, 2025 1:26 pm PDT by
iOS 26 was released last month, but the software train never stops, and iOS 26.1 beta testing is already underway. So far, iOS 26.1 makes both Apple Intelligence and Live Translation on compatible AirPods available in additional languages, and it includes some other minor changes across Apple Music, Calendar, Photos, and Safari. More features and changes will follow in future versions,...
john ternus on stage

Gurman: Major Apple Leadership Shakeup Impending With John Ternus as Next CEO

Monday October 6, 2025 6:21 am PDT by
Apple is entering its most significant leadership transition in more than a decade as multiple senior executives prepare to depart and CEO Tim Cook begins to shape the company's next generation of leaders, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In the latest edition of his "Power On" newsletter, Gurman explained that Jeff Williams, who was viewed as Cook's potential successor for several...
iPhone 17 vs Air and Pros Feature

New iPhones See 'Stronger Than Expected' Demand With One Exception

Thursday October 2, 2025 7:26 am PDT by
Nearly two weeks after the iPhone 17 series launched, analysts at investment banking firm Morgan Stanley said demand for the devices has been "modestly stronger than we originally expected," based on a combination of extended shipping estimates on Apple's online store and information it gathered from Apple's supply chain. There has been strong early demand for the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro,...
iOS 26 Feature

iOS 26 Adds These 200 New Features and Changes to Your iPhone

Saturday October 4, 2025 8:19 am PDT by
Apple's website offers a list of nearly 200 new features and changes (PDF file) included in the software update, released last month. Apple also shared equivalent lists for iPadOS 26 and macOS Tahoe. iOS 26 is compatible with the iPhone 11 and newer. To install the update, open the Settings app on your iPhone, tap on General, and tap on Software Update. Below, we have highlighted eight ...
ios 26 1 slide to stop

Apple Fixes Alarms in iOS 26.1

Monday October 6, 2025 11:56 am PDT by
With the second beta of iOS 26.1, Apple updated the design of alarms set on the iPhone, making them harder to dismiss than before. Stopping an alarm in iOS 26.1 beta 2 requires a new Slide to Stop gesture rather than a simple tap. You can continue to tap to snooze an alarm, but if you want to turn it off entirely, you need to use a swipe. Transitioning from a tap to a slide gesture to...
macbook air prime day 2025

M5 MacBook Air: Release Date, Features, and Performance Predictions

Friday October 3, 2025 3:39 am PDT by
The MacBook Air is Apple's most popular laptop – a thin, fanless machine that wields quiet power thanks to the efficiency of Apple silicon. While the M4 model isn't exactly old, attention is already turning to its successor. Apple doesn't telegraph new product launches ahead of time, but we can draw a surprisingly clear picture of what to expect by looking at Apple's silicon roadmap,...
iCloud iPhone 17 Pro

Apple Highlights Five Perks for iPhone Users Who Pay for iCloud Storage

Monday October 6, 2025 6:29 am PDT by
After launching new iPhones last month, Apple is promoting iCloud+ with a prominent banner on its home page, in a bid to boost its services revenue. In addition to more storage, all iCloud+ plans include five perks for iPhone users. As a refresher, iCloud includes 5GB of storage for free. If you want extra storage, you need to subscribe to an iCloud+ plan. In the United States, prices range...
ipad mini 7 feature blue

iPad Mini 8 on the Way: Expected Features and Release Timeline

Monday October 6, 2025 5:05 am PDT by
A new iPad mini is "absolutely" on the way, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. So what should we expect from the successor to the iPad mini 7 that Apple released a year ago? Processor and Performance Apple is working on a next-generation version of the iPad mini (codename J510/J511) that features the A19 Pro chip, according to information found in code that Apple mistakenly shared in...

Top Rated Comments

surferfb Avatar
16 weeks ago

What about Optis makes you think they're a troll?

- The lawsuit is clearly not just a nuisance suit asking for cost-of-litigation settlement. The economics are clearly based on real value of the patented contributions to the LTE standard.
- The patents came out of LG, Panasonic, and Samsung. These are real bona-fide innovators that contributed real bona-fide innovations to LTE.
- The patents survived numerous validity challenges at both the district court and the (notoriously defendant-friendly) PTAB. Apple spent millions trying to invalidate them and failed. It is beyond dispute now that the patents are good and valid.
- To get to trial, the suit had to survive several offramps and narrowing. Rule 11, motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgement, claim construction, motions for judgement as a matter of law, etc. To get this far, a plaintiff has to run the table on every issue. But a defendant has to only win one issue to wipe it all away.

All of this is not proof that Optis is right and deserves $500M. Rather, it is evidence that Optis is not merely just a troll.
Optis doesn't invent anything but instead buys up patents with the specific intent to file lawsuits against companies they allege to be infringing them.

They're trolls.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
alecgold Avatar
16 weeks ago
Ugh patent trolls. I do understand the need and usefulness of patents, and the subsequent protection on them. And I do understand that you can’t always (directly) use a patent. But these trolls have made a business model out of filing as many useless patents without any intent of ever developing a useful product or service and the start litigating everybody into oblivion.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Mousse Avatar
16 weeks ago

What about Optis makes you think they're a troll?
They don't make anything. That carries a lot of weight in how I decide whether an entity is a patent troll or not. Having an idea is good, but going after others because they made that idea a reality? Come on, man.

As a patent holding company, Optis does not manufacture products, instead going after tech companies that may violate the patent portfolio that it owns.
Anyhow, I agree with the court's decision to overturn.

When appealing the initial ruling from the Eastern District Court of Texas, Apple argued that the court had not fairly separated the different patent claims that it allegedly violated, and only asked the jurors to determine if Apple violated any patents. The federal appeals court agreed with Apple, and said that the district court ruling provided incorrect jury instructions and violated Apple's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial on each patent infringement claim.
Not surprising it's the Eastern District Court of Texas. Patent trolls love suing there because that court usually finds in favor of the patent trolls.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DelayedGratificationGene Avatar
16 weeks ago
Man how do patent trolls live with themselves? They are the bottom of the barrel
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
16 weeks ago

First, Optis' specific intent is to license. Optis presented plenty of evidence that Apple refused to pay even FRAND rates. If an infringer sandbags you for years, what else are you to do? It is Apple that forced Optis into a lawsuit, not the other way around.
You just defined a patent troll. They buy patents just to extract money from people actually making things.


Second, all of you are applying an overly broad view of what a troll is.
- Is University of Wisconsin a troll because they own a lot of patents, don't make anything, and often litigate to get license fees? Under your definitions, almost all universities and research hospitals are patent trolls.
- What about independent R&D labs, such as Wilus in South Korea? They don't make anything, but they spend a ton on R&D and contribute real innovations that make cellular and wifi better, license their tech to implementors, and sue when implementors refuse to pay.
No, they are the ones developing the inventions, not buying patents from actual inventors so they can sue.


The other issue with such a broad view of trolls is it totally screws the inventors. There is nothing wrong with getting paid and selling your inventions. In Optis' case, LG, Panasonic, and Samsung do make real products and spent real money on R&D to develop that LTE tech. But each of LG, Panasonic, or Samsung have their legitimate reasons for not wanting to engage in the business of licensing. I don't blame them; licensing is risky and a distraction. Why is it so wrong to take the sure thing (whatever the market is willing to pay today) and let someone else do the licensing stuff?
It’s not wrong to sell or license patents, but I’d argue it is wrong to buy and weaponize them solely for litigation, which is what Optis does.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
kwikdeth Avatar
16 weeks ago

First, Optis' specific intent is to license. Optis presented plenty of evidence that Apple refused to pay even FRAND rates. If an infringer sandbags you for years, what else are you to do? It is Apple that forced Optis into a lawsuit, not the other way around.

Second, all of you are applying an overly broad view of what a troll is.
- Is University of Wisconsin a troll because they own a lot of patents, don't make anything, and often litigate to get license fees? Under your definitions, almost all universities and research hospitals are patent trolls.
- What about independent R&D labs, such as Wilus in South Korea? They don't make anything, but they spend a ton on R&D and contribute real innovations that make cellular and wifi better, license their tech to implementors, and sue when implementors refuse to pay.

The other issue with such a broad view of trolls is it totally screws the inventors. There is nothing wrong with getting paid and selling your inventions. In Optis' case, LG, Panasonic, and Samsung do make real products and spent real money on R&D to develop that LTE tech. But each of LG, Panasonic, or Samsung have their legitimate reasons for not wanting to engage in the business of licensing. I don't blame them; licensing is risky and a distraction. Why is it so wrong to take the sure thing (whatever the market is willing to pay today) and let someone else do the licensing stuff?
The key differentiator you are deliberately glazing over is that in all your other cited examples, they are the originators of the patents, and not a third party that purchased them and then used them as basis for litigation.
Anyway, found the Optis PR guy. Figures they'd deploy the forum version of their trolls to sway opinion.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)