Apple Seeks to Dismiss U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Lawsuit

In March, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and 16 states filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging that the company has an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market with the iPhone and the device's locked-down ecosystem.

Apple vs DOJ Feature
The lawsuit accuses Apple of broad anticompetitive conduct that affects everything from web browsers and messaging to apps and digital payments. According to the DOJ, Apple has made it harder for consumers to switch between smartphone platforms, blocked the development of cloud-based streaming apps, made the cross-platform messaging experience worse, limited the functionality of third-party smartwatches paired to the iPhone, prevented third-party apps from offering tap-to-pay functionality, and more.

Some of Apple's policy changes this year have already negated some of these claims. In January, the company started allowing cloud-based game streaming apps on the App Store worldwide. And in August, it opened up the iPhone's NFC chip used by Apple Pay to third-party developers in the U.S. and select other countries.

In a New Jersey federal court on Wednesday, lawyers representing Apple argued that the lawsuit should be dismissed, claiming that the DOJ has failed to plausibly allege that the company has monopoly power in the smartphone market and that consumers were harmed. Judge Julien Neals said that he hopes to make a ruling by January.

"We believe this lawsuit is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will vigorously defend against it," said Apple, when the lawsuit was filed earlier this year.

A motion to dismiss is a fairly common step in lawsuits, and it is likely that the case will proceed to trial, although some of the claims could potentially be amended or dismissed. In all likelihood, the U.S. v. Apple trial will drag on for years to come.

Read our U.S. v. Apple guide for more details about the lawsuit.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.3 and iOS 26.4 Will Add These New Features to Your iPhone

Tuesday February 3, 2026 7:47 am PST by
While the iOS 26.3 Release Candidate is now available ahead of a public release, the first iOS 26.4 beta is likely still at least a week away. Following beta testing, iOS 26.4 will likely be released to the general public in March or April. Below, we have recapped known or rumored iOS 26.3 and iOS 26.4 features so far. iOS 26.3 iPhone to Android Transfer Tool iOS 26.3 makes it easier...
imac video apple feature

Apple Makes Its Second-Biggest Acquisition Ever

Tuesday February 3, 2026 12:45 pm PST by
Apple recently acquired Israeli startup Q.ai for close to $2 billion, according to Financial Times sources. That would make this Apple's second-biggest acquisition ever, after it paid $3 billion for the popular headphone maker Beats in 2014. This is also the largest known Apple acquisition since the company purchased Intel's smartphone modem business and patents for $1 billion in 2019....
Apple Logo Zoomed

Tim Cook Teases Plans for Apple's Upcoming 50th Anniversary

Thursday February 5, 2026 12:54 pm PST by
Apple turns 50 this year, and its CEO Tim Cook has promised to celebrate the milestone. The big day falls on April 1, 2026. "I've been unusually reflective lately about Apple because we have been working on what do we do to mark this moment," Cook told employees today, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "When you really stop and pause and think about the last 50 years, it makes your heart ...
wwdc sans text feature

Apple Rumored to Announce New Product on February 19

Thursday February 5, 2026 12:22 pm PST by
Apple plans to announce the iPhone 17e on Thursday, February 19, according to Macwelt, the German equivalent of Macworld. The report, citing industry sources, is available in English on Macworld. Apple announced the iPhone 16e on Wednesday, February 19 last year, so the iPhone 17e would be unveiled exactly one year later if this rumor is accurate. It is quite uncommon for Apple to unveil...
iphone 16 pro colors 1

Apple Begins Selling Refurbished iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro Models at Lower Prices

Wednesday February 4, 2026 7:44 am PST by
Apple today began selling certified refurbished iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max models on its online store in the U.S., with prices discounted by 12% to 22% compared to Apple's current or former pricing for the devices. Here were Apple's starting prices when the devices launched in September 2024: iPhone 16: $799 iPhone 16 Plus: $899 iPhone 16 Pro:...

Top Rated Comments

mystery hill Avatar
16 months ago
This is getting ridiculous. Apple should pull out of the U.S.
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ctrlos Avatar
16 months ago
Apple don't have a monopoly on tap-to-pay; you can still use innumerable plastic alternatives from any provider you want. As customers there has been zero call for an alternative to Apple Pay and for good reason.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DominikHoffmann Avatar
16 months ago
Look at my Avatar. I am all for free enterprise. However, what if iPhone users like Apple the way it is? I do have alternatives to my iPhone. I can buy an Android phone. To how many aspects of a competitor’s product should the Government be able to reduce the competitive advantage of one over the other? Should the Government be able to take away the ability for Apple have the competitive advantage because of…

* iMessage,
* the exclusive ability to run iOS,
* the exclusive integration with certain features of other Apple products (Macs, AirPods, etc.), or
* the security that Apple’s walled garden provides?

Where do we draw the line? The extreme would be to force Apple or a company to which Apple divests the iPhone to become a pure hardware company. It would turn all smart phones into a commodity, like they have become on the Android side of things. What does it matter, whether my phone is made by Samsung or LG?
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rp2011 Avatar
16 months ago
Yes the lawsuit is ridiculous. People forget or like to pretend they do not remember the history of the iPhone. Apple forged into an already saturated and highly competitive wireless phone market where it was laughed off by their competition who insisted they liked their strategy better. Apple's devices were more expensive and didn't have keyboards. It was a paradigm shift that offered an easier and better experience to users at the time, as were most of their products with the Mac. And that's the problem right there: the established players did not see a reason to change. It's not Apple that forced me to switch from a Blackberry. Nor is anyone forcing anyone to stay on Android or any other platform. People like the experience and if and when they don't they can leave. Consumers have always had plenty of choice with wireless phones and the ecosystem that comes with any product they choose. It's called differentiation. Choice. The DOJ and European regulators are trying to force homogeneity where Apple has been offering choice.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DominikHoffmann Avatar
16 months ago
Maybe the tack to take with the incoming administration would be that Apple’s unique security model is predicated on its walled garden and that it poses a strategic advantage in the already in full swing cyber World War III. A strategic advantage that must not be weakened.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
spazzcat Avatar
16 months ago

This is getting ridiculous. Apple should pull out of the U.S.
This lawsuit is going nowhere, the new administration will kill it.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)