M4 Max MacBook Pro: Real-World Usage Tests

Apple last week replaced the M3 Max MacBook Pro with the new M4 Max ‌MacBook Pro‌, and we picked up one of the new high-end ‌MacBook Pro‌ machines to see how it compares to the prior model with both benchmarks and real-world tests.


We tested an M4 Max with a 16-core CPU, 40-core GPU, and 48GB RAM against an M3 Max ‌MacBook Pro‌ with similar specs. The two machines look similar, but the display on the M4 version did get some improvements and it's a little bit brighter. There's an option for nano-texture too, which makes a big difference if you ever work outside.

Thunderbolt 5 ports instead of Thunderbolt 4 ports allow you to connect more displays (up to three 6K displays) and get faster transfer speeds. Unsurprisingly, the M4 Max performed better across the board on benchmarks, and those higher numbers did indeed translate to actual improvements in day-to-day performance.

Creating a slow motion clip from a standard clip in Topaz Labs AI took the M3 Max ‌MacBook Pro‌ a little over six minutes, while the M4 Max ‌MacBook Pro‌ was done in under five minutes.

Exporting a 6 minute 4K video with effects, plugins, LUTs, Roto AI masks, Motion VFX, and more from Final Cut Pro took the M3 Max 1:17, while the M4 Max did it in 1:07. It's only a 10 second savings, but that adds up with longer videos and over time.

Obviously you're not going to be upgrading to the M4 Max ‌MacBook Pro‌ if you have an M3 Max machine, but it is interesting to see the year-over-year improvements. If you have something like an M1 Pro or an M1 Max and do a lot of CPU/GPU heavy tasks, upgrading to the M4 Max could end up saving you a good amount of time.

Let us know what you think of the M4 Max ‌MacBook Pro‌'s performance in the comments below.

Related Roundup: MacBook Pro
Buyer's Guide: MacBook Pro (Neutral)
Related Forum: MacBook Pro

Popular Stories

iOS 19 visionOS UI Elements

iOS 19 to Have Some of the 'Biggest' Design Changes in iPhone's History

Sunday March 16, 2025 10:35 am PDT by
Apple is planning some of the "biggest iOS and macOS redesigns in its history," according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman reiterated that iOS 19 will have a visionOS-like design with more transparent interfaces:The new interfaces will adopt the design principles introduced in visionOS, the software for Apple's Vision Pro headset. That includes greater...
iphone 17 pro asherdipps

iPhone 17 Pro Max Rumors Allegedly Refer to 'iPhone 17 Ultra' Model

Friday March 14, 2025 7:56 am PDT by
If you've been following iPhone rumors over the last few years, you may remember reading reports that Apple flirted with the idea of introducing a super high-end "Ultra" model that would either replace its Pro Max device or sit above it in Apple's smartphone hirearchy. These reports appeared in the pre-launch iPhone 15 and iPhone 16 rumor cycles, but ultimately came to nothing. Now though, the...
iPhone 17 Air Size Feature

Ultra-Thin 'iPhone 17 Air' Rumored to Include These 12 Features

Saturday March 15, 2025 10:50 am PDT by
While the so-called "iPhone 17 Air" is not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the ultra-thin device. Overall, the "iPhone 17 Air" sounds like a mixed bag. While the device is expected to have an impressively thin and light design, rumors indicate it will have some compromises compared to iPhone 17 Pro models, including only a single rear camera, a...
Bent iPhone Air Feature

Apple Canned Larger iPhone 17 Air Model Over Fears of Bendgate 2.0

Monday March 17, 2025 4:07 am PDT by
Apple prototyped a larger ultra-slim iPhone 17 Air with a 6.9-inch display, but ultimately decided not to go ahead with the device because of fears that it could be susceptible to bending, according to a new report. Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman, writing in his latest Power On newsletter: When it first started work on the phone, it prototyped a device with a 6.9-inch screen — matching...
iphone 16 pro models 1

Apple's First Foldable iPhone Estimated to Cost Nearly Twice as Much as iPhone 16 Pro Max

Monday March 17, 2025 6:42 am PDT by
In an investor research note today with British bank Barclays, analyst Tim Long said Apple's first foldable iPhone could have a starting price in the $2,300 range in the United States, which would make it by far the most expensive iPhone model ever. If the first foldable iPhone starts at $2,299, that means it would cost nearly twice as much as the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which starts at $1,199. ...
iPhone 17 Air Size Feature

'iPhone 17 Air' Rumored to Start at $899 With Surprisingly Good Battery Life, Camera Control, and More

Sunday March 16, 2025 9:05 am PDT by
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman today shared some new details about the rumored iPhone 17 Air. In his Power On newsletter, Gurman said he was told that the device may start at roughly $899 in the U.S., which means that it would occupy the same price point as the iPhone 16 Plus. This would make sense, as it has been widely rumored that the Air model will take over the Plus model's spot in the iPhone...
General iOS Mail Feature

iOS 18.3.2 Broke iCloud Mail Delivery

Monday March 17, 2025 3:31 pm PDT by
The iOS 18.3.2 update that Apple released last week appears to have broken iCloud Mail for some users. There are multiple complaints on Reddit and the MacRumors forums from users who say that iCloud Mail is not able to push new iCloud emails to their iPhones after the iOS 18.3.2 update. Affected users say that despite having the correct settings enabled, new iCloud emails are not showing up...
iphone 16e usb c feature

'iPhone 17 Air' is Step Towards Slimmer iPhones Without USB-C Ports

Sunday March 16, 2025 9:36 am PDT by
Apple considered launching the iPhone 17 Air without a USB-C charging port, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman said that while Apple ultimately decided against making the iPhone 17 Air its first iPhone model without a charging port, the idea is still on the table for future iPhone models. He said the iPhone 17 Air will "foreshadow a move to...

Top Rated Comments

ColonelShaun Avatar
18 weeks ago
I'm a video editor (still using an M1 iMac Happily), and more than export times, I'm always interested in hearing about how fluidly you can scrub through clips and watch timelines without rendering. The render speeds are always a nice comparison benchmark, but 10 seconds doesn't mean as much. My computer can render most things in a reasonable time. Where I see my m1 struggle is watching 4K Multicam clips with the Multicam viewer open. Or coloring footage and adding titles and playing it back without rendering first.

I'm not sure the scientific way to test that, but that data would be really helpful with a comparison. Something to think about for the future?

(And I'd love to see those comparisons for an M4 Pro Mac mini vs the M4 Max MBP. That's the dilemma I'm in.

Thanks for doing these for us!
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Syrianos82 Avatar
18 weeks ago
What strikes me a bit is that when the iPad m4 came out most people were leaning toward the negative side reviewing the nano texture. With the m4 MacBook Pro it seems everbody suddenly works outside or in crazy bright offices… ?

Nobody is talking about slight fuzziness and less sharp text or lines.

What made the general opinion flip sides??

(Yes I have an iPad Pro with nano texture so speaking from personal experience)
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Normandy_sr2 Avatar
18 weeks ago

Obvious to who? Maybe not you or me, but there may be plenty of people who see a benefit.
I have extensive experience as a full-time video producer spanning several decades, and I currently use the M3 MAX. Based on my analysis, upgrading to this model does not offer a meaningful return on investment (ROI) for users who already own an M2 or M3 series, and even the M1 Max would be difficult to justify beyond mere "bragging rights." The performance gains, while present, are incremental and do not provide a substantial leap in practical video production workflows. Unless you are specifically seeking the latest hardware for prestige or minimal performance improvements, the financial outlay is not warranted. For those intent on purchasing, however, it's your prerogative.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
roar08 Avatar
18 weeks ago

Obviously you're not going to be upgrading to the M4 Max MacBook Pro if you have an M3 Max machine
Obvious to who? Maybe not you or me, but there may be plenty of people who see a benefit.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Marek5069 Avatar
18 weeks ago
This was a frustrating video to watch. There are many ways to show a comparison that would be so much better than how it was done. Put the benchmarks for both machines on the screen at once. If you had the data from the M1 Max and M2 Max, instead of just saying you have that data, show it also. Would have been great to see the progression reflected. Swing and a miss.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MrRoberto Avatar
18 weeks ago

Obvious to who? Maybe not you or me, but there may be plenty of people who see a benefit.
Just look up how many M3 Max MacBook Pros are being dropped on eBay every week and that should give you an idea of how many folks are upgrading from M3 Max to M4 Max.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)