Skip to Content

Faster mmWave 5G Still Limited to U.S. iPhone 16 Models

Apple today introduced the new iPhone 16, ‌iPhone 16‌ Plus, ‌iPhone 16‌ Pro, and ‌iPhone 16‌ Pro Max models, but the update has not expanded mmWave 5G to countries outside of the United States. All four ‌iPhone 16‌ models offer mmWave 5G in the U.S., but other countries are still limited to sub-6GHz 5G.

iphone 16 pro max
mmWave 5G has been a United States exclusive since 5G technology first debuted in the iPhone 12 as an upgrade for LTE. Apple hasn't rolled out mmWave 5G in other countries because other countries largely have yet to widely adopt the faster speeds. There are mmWave networks in countries like Australia, China, and Japan, but it is not a standard that has been fully embraced. In Australia, for example, mmWave is only available in select areas of major cities like Melbourne and Sydney.

While mmWave technology offers the fastest 5G speeds, it is limited to urban areas due to its short range and inability to penetrate obstacles. Sub-6GHz 5G is much more widespread, even in the United States, because it can also be used in rural and suburban areas.

It is worth noting that Apple replaced the mmWave antenna on the ‌iPhone 16‌ models in the United States with the Camera Control button. There is no obvious mmWave cutout anymore, with the antenna instead built into the ‌iPhone‌'s frame.

Other countries do not have a mmWave antenna at all, and instead have a physical SIM slot, a feature that no longer exists in the U.S.

Related Roundup: iPhone 16
Related Forum: iPhone

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
HomePod mini and Apple TV Sage

New Apple TV and HomePod Mini Are Still Missing, Here's Why

Thursday March 5, 2026 6:11 am PST by
Apple this week unveiled seven products, ranging from the iPhone 17e to the MacBook Neo, but new Apple TV and HomePod mini models were not among them. Given that there have been rumors about the next-generation Apple TV and HomePod mini since all the way back in late 2024, some customers are wondering why the devices have yet to launch, and the answer likely relates to Siri. In September, ...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...

Top Rated Comments

smithrh Avatar
20 months ago
This is a very very niche technology that has an extremely limited rollout.

No one should have FOMO over this.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Dr McKay Avatar
20 months ago
I get this in my home town without mmwave I think I'll survive.




Attachment Image
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
arthurgd3 Avatar
20 months ago
mmWave 5G is completely overhyped and mostly pointless since it has such a limited scenario where it works well. sub6 5G as I have with T-Mobile here in the US, there are places where I am comfortably getting over 1Gbps down on my Pixel 8 Pro and about 150Mbps up so it isn't slow by any means.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 months ago
I’m in London and I get reliably faster speeds with 4G than with 5G. And much better battery life. I’ve been using my 15 Pro for about a year with 5G mostly turned off. Had to turn it on in NYC though!
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
suchnerve Avatar
20 months ago
Chicken and egg situation.

mmWave’s range should be thought of as being like really good Wi-Fi, rather than being compared to sub-6 cellular. Its several hundred feet of propagation distance is plenty for achieving broad urban coverage, if actually deployed on all existing sites.

Most of mmWave’s perceived coverage issues are just because it isn’t fully deployed. Of course the connection is gonna drop if not all the sites around you have it.

It’s all worth it for the congestion resistance. mmWave has so much capacity that it’s nearly impossible to congest to the point of unusability. You could be in a dense crowd of people all using their phones, and mmWave would still work just fine.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bradman83 Avatar
20 months ago

Chicken and egg situation.

mmWave’s range should be thought of as being like really good Wi-Fi, rather than being compared to sub-6 cellular. Its several hundred feet of propagation distance is plenty for achieving broad urban coverage, if actually deployed on all existing sites.

Most of mmWave’s perceived coverage issues are just because it isn’t fully deployed. Of course the connection is gonna drop if not all the sites around you have it.

It’s all worth it for the congestion resistance. mmWave has so much capacity that it’s nearly impossible to congest to the point of unusability. You could be in a dense crowd of people all using their phones, and mmWave would still work just fine.
This is a great summary. mmWave is handy to have for event venues or other places where people routinely gather and max out even C-band cellular. I don't sense that much is lost by it not being included given the limited applicability.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)