Facebook Fined Record $1.3 Billion Over EU User Data Transfers to the US

Facebook owner Meta has been hit with a record $1.3 billion (€1.2 billion) fine by European Union regulators for mishandling user information, and has been ordered to suspend the transfer of data from users in the EU to the United States.

Facebook Feature
The fine was issued by Ireland's Data Protection Commission, which regulates Facebook across the EU, after it ruled that the social network's data transfers to the U.S. "did not address the risks to the fundamental rights and freedoms" of EU users and violated General Data Protection Regulation.

The fine constitutes the largest ever imposed under the EU's GDPR privacy law, the previous one being a €746 million penalty issued to Amazon in 2021 for similar privacy violations.

In addition to the fine, Meta was given five months to suspend any future transfer of personal data to the U.S., and six months to end "the unlawful processing, including storage, in the U.S." of transferred personal data. Instagram and WhatsApp, which Meta also owns, are not subject to the order.

A previous mechanism to legally transfer personal data between the U.S. and the EU, known as the "Privacy Shield" pact, was struck down by the EU bloc's top court in 2020. The Irish regulator alleged that Meta infringed on the EU's GDPR laws when it continued to transfer personal data to the U.S. after 2020 despite the court ruling.

The issue has been ongoing for a decade after a legal challenge brought by Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems against Facebook in 2013, over concerns resulting from the Edward Snowden revelations that EU user data is not sufficiently protected from U.S. intelligence agencies when transferred across the Atlantic.

"This decision is flawed, unjustified and sets a dangerous precedent for the countless other companies transferring data between the EU and U.S.," said Nick Clegg, Facebook's president of global affairs, responding to the decision in a blog post. "We will appeal the ruling, including the unjustified and unnecessary fine, and seek a stay of the orders through the courts."

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Top Rated Comments

krspkbl Avatar
2 weeks ago
Can Facebook please just die already (Instagram and WhatsApp too)? Disgusting vile company. The world would actually be better without it.
Score: 58 Votes (Like | Disagree)
wanha Avatar
2 weeks ago
Couldn't have happened to a nicer company
Score: 51 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheYayAreaLiving ?️ Avatar
2 weeks ago
It’s 4:29 AM, I woke up to write:

-The fine should have been $10.3 Billion Dollars.
-Never Ever TRUST Facebook.
-Shut down Facebook to save Humanity.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DarthDon Avatar
2 weeks ago
Marky Zuckerberg's day is propably ****ed. Well done, EU.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
constructor Avatar
2 weeks ago

I'm not a Facebook fan at all, but the EU is a big problem. Do they actually help anything? Or just provide an unnecessary layer of regulatory Karen?
GDPR is effectively a massive boost of our personal freedom via european legislation – normally this would belong among the first articles of a constitution, but constitutions are less fluid and less adaptable to changing circumstances so this is how it was done, and consistently EU-wide.

The EU has indeed been a massive boon for the continent, for businesses and especially for its citizens: EU-internal borders are no longer keeping countries, supply chains and people apart; Harmonized EU regulations are the same across the continent so it is massively simpler to live and to sell across borders and even overall due to easy and fast trade across the continent.

EU regulations have generally replaced mountains of inconsistent national legislations, not added to them, so the overall result is simpler, not more complicated. (In many cases european regulations are to be implemented nationally, but the core regulation is still consistent across the continent this way, just adapted to the respective national framework. Of course some of those national implementations are more sensible and straightforward than others.)

And the EU bureaucracy is actually very small and lightweight in relation to the 450 million citizens it is working for.

Of course there is plenty of space to squabble about EU policies just as on any other level, but overall the EU makes a lot of sense and makes our lives and work a lot easier on the whole.

And many worker and citizen rights are nowadays based on EU regulations, too, as is the case with GDPR.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Vespi Avatar
2 weeks ago
Just ban Facebook and other meta owned apps in EU already
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

gradiente iphone white

Brazilian Electronics Company Revives Long-Running iPhone Trademark Dispute

Tuesday May 19, 2020 1:06 pm PDT by
Apple has been involved in a long-running iPhone trademark dispute in Brazil, which was revived today by IGB Electronica, a Brazilian consumer electronics company that originally registered the "iPhone" name in 2000. IGB Electronica fought a multi-year battle with Apple in an attempt to get exclusive rights to the "iPhone" trademark, but ultimately lost, and now the case has been brought to...