Apple Wins Appeals Battle in Ongoing Patent Infringement War With VirnetX, Could Save $502.8 Million

Apple has been embroiled in a patent dispute with VirnetX for well over a decade, and the company today won an appeals verdict that could ultimately save it from having to pay VirnetX $502.8 million in patent infringement fees.

virnetx apple
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday confirmed a ruling by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office invalidating a pair of patents that VirnetX used in its patent infringement lawsuit against Apple, according to Reuters.

Apple in 2020 was ordered to pay VirnetX $503 million for infringing on VPN patents owned by VirnetX with the iPhone's VPN on demand feature. The two patents that have been invalidated were involved in that lawsuit, and now Apple might get the entire judgment vacated.

Apple appealed the $502.8 million award verdict after it was rendered, with both Apple and VirnetX presenting arguments in the appeal back in September. VirnetX attorney Jeff Lamken said at the time that if the court ultimately sided with the USPTO and invalidated the patents in the patent validity case, VirnetX could "have a big problem." He said that he did not think VirnetX would have an "enforceable judgment" in that situation, so this is potentially a major win for Apple.

With the patents now invalidated, VirnetX and Apple will again meet in court over the initial appeals case that Apple filed to determine whether Apple will need to pay up, and it's looking like the $502.8 million verdict will be thrown out.

Regardless of how this case plays out, Apple was forced to pay VirnetX $440 million for violating VirnetX's communications security patents with the FaceTime and iMessage features.

VirnetX is largely viewed a patent holding company or "patent troll" that does not offer actual products or services. It generates revenue by litigating technology companies that infringe on its patents, though it does also market its "War Room" software for authenticated meetings.

Popular Stories

iPhone SE 4 Vertical Camera Feature

iPhone SE 4 Production Will Reportedly Begin Ramping Up in October

Tuesday July 23, 2024 2:00 pm PDT by
Following nearly two years of rumors about a fourth-generation iPhone SE, The Information today reported that Apple suppliers are finally planning to begin ramping up mass production of the device in October of this year. If accurate, that timeframe would mean that the next iPhone SE would not be announced alongside the iPhone 16 series in September, as expected. Instead, the report...
iPhone 17 Plus Feature

iPhone 17 Lineup Specs Detail Display Upgrade and New High-End Model

Monday July 22, 2024 4:33 am PDT by
Key details about the overall specifications of the iPhone 17 lineup have been shared by the leaker known as "Ice Universe," clarifying several important aspects of next year's devices. Reports in recent months have converged in agreement that Apple will discontinue the "Plus" iPhone model in 2025 while introducing an all-new iPhone 17 "Slim" model as an even more high-end option sitting...
Generic iPhone 17 Feature With Full Width Dynamic Island

Kuo: Ultra-Thin iPhone 17 to Feature A19 Chip, Single Rear Camera, Semi-Titanium Frame, and More

Wednesday July 24, 2024 9:06 am PDT by
Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo today shared alleged specifications for a new ultra-thin iPhone 17 model rumored to launch next year. Kuo expects the device to be equipped with a 6.6-inch display with a current-size Dynamic Island, a standard A19 chip rather than an A19 Pro chip, a single rear camera, and an Apple-designed 5G chip. He also expects the device to have a...
iPhone 16 Pro Sizes Feature

iPhone 16 Series Is Less Than Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Thursday July 25, 2024 5:43 am PDT by
Apple typically releases its new iPhone series around mid-September, which means we are about two months out from the launch of the iPhone 16. Like the iPhone 15 series, this year's lineup is expected to stick with four models – iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max – although there are plenty of design differences and new features to take into account. To bring ...
icloud private relay outage

iCloud Private Relay Experiencing Outage

Thursday July 25, 2024 3:18 pm PDT by
Apple’s iCloud Private Relay service is down for some users, according to Apple’s System Status page. Apple says that the iCloud Private Relay service may be slow or unavailable. The outage started at 2:34 p.m. Eastern Time, but it does not appear to be affecting all iCloud users. Some impacted users are unable to browse the web without turning iCloud Private Relay off, while others are...

Top Rated Comments

ct2k7 Avatar
17 months ago
VirtnetX stopped Apple from making FaceTime an open standard. I won’t forget.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
17 months ago
XeroxPARC stole the mouse from Stanford and Xerox both invested in Apple at the time (20%) which allowed access to PARC and one of the stated reasons for that investment was the hope Apple could commercialize PARC technology.

And Apple was insured by Xerox, resulting in if PARC had sued Apple and won, Xerox would have paid their own award.

So PARC influenced the Macintosh, but it was certainly not direct IP infringement as it did not use PARC's code as the foundation and PARC might not even have patented any of it. The Macintosh GUI also had many features that PARC's GUI did not have, including drop-down menus and such.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ronntaylor Avatar
17 months ago

Of course. Apple steals & deliberately infringes on other company's tech/ip and then has the complete nerve to play victim, refuses to pay what they should for said theft, and drags the company through the courts.

From XeroxPARC to this. Same as it ever was.
Guess you didn't read the article:


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Court on Thursday confirmed a ruling by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office invalidating a pair of patents that VirnetX used in its patent infringement lawsuit against Apple...
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
EmotionalSnow Avatar
17 months ago

Of course. Apple steals & deliberately infringes on other company's tech/ip and then has the complete nerve to play victim, refuses to pay what they should for said theft, and drags the company through the courts.

From XeroxPARC to this. Same as it ever was.
Except that their patents are unenforceable and invalid. They were granted erroneously.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
17 months ago

It certainly was infringement by Apple as Apple never got a licence for Xeorx's gui to begin with.
Apple didn't need a license for it because they didn't use any of its code as the foundation for the first Mac OS. They took it as inspiration and modified it in many significant ways - ways that made it a better OS than the original Alto OS.

If you look at the Alto's OS and the first Macintosh's OS, the only thing they really share in common is both are in black and white.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JM Avatar
17 months ago
Now THIS is Apple News that can bring us all together like the good ol’ days.

?
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)