Root Access Sudo Bug Found to Affect macOS Big Sur

A sudo bug that can grant an attacker root access has been discovered to affect macOS Big Sur (via ZDNet).

sudo bug macos

The security vulnerability, identified last week as "CVE-2021-3156" by the Qualys Security Team, affects sudo, which is a program that allows users to run commands with the security privileges of another user, such as an administrator. The bug triggers a "heap overflow" in sudo that changes the current user's privileges to enable root-level access. This can give an attacker access to the entire system. An attacker would need to gain low-level access to a system first to be able to exploit the bug, such as via planted malware.

Sudo is part of many Unix-like systems, including macOS, but it was initially unknown if the vulnerability affected Mac machines since it was only tested by Qualys on Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora. Security researcher Matthew Hickey has now confirmed that the most recent version of macOS, macOS Big Sur 11.2 can be subject to the sudo attack.

Last week, there was speculation that the macOS Big Sur 11.2 update may address the sudo vulnerability, though it was not definitively known at the time if the bug would affect macOS. While it was found that sudo was left unchanged in macOS Big Sur 11.2, it is now clear that macOS is affected by the exploit.

With some minor modifications, Hickey found that the sudo bug could be used to grant attackers access to macOS root accounts, and the discovery has now been verified by Carnegie Mellon University vulnerability analyst Will Dormann.

Apple has reportedly been notified of the CVE-2021-3156 vulnerability, and due to the severity of the issue, a patch will likely be released soon.

Popular Stories

iPhone Top Left Hole Punch Face ID Feature Purple

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Thursday January 15, 2026 10:56 am PST by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another eight months, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we have recapped 12 features rumored for the iPhone 18 Pro models, as of January 2026: The same overall design is expected, with 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch display sizes, and a "plateau" housing three rear cameras Under-screen Face ID...
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

These 5 Apple Products Will Reportedly Be Upgraded With OLED Displays

Friday January 16, 2026 7:07 pm PST by
Apple plans to upgrade the iPad mini, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, iMac, and MacBook Air with OLED displays between 2026 and 2028, according to DigiTimes. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman previously reported that the iPad mini and MacBook Pro will receive an OLED display as early as this year, but he does not expect the MacBook Air to adopt the technology until 2028 at the earliest. A new iPad Air is...
2024 iPhone Boxes Feature

Apple Adjusts Trade-In Values for iPhones, Macs, and More

Thursday January 15, 2026 11:19 am PST by
Apple today updated its trade-in values for select iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch models. Trade-ins can be completed on Apple's website, or at an Apple Store. The charts below provide an overview of Apple's current and previous trade-in values in the United States, according to the company's website. Most of the values declined slightly, but some of the Mac values increased. iPhone ...
Apple Wallet ID Illinois

Apple Plans to Expand iPhone Driver's Licenses to These 7 U.S. States

Friday January 16, 2026 12:12 pm PST by
In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps. The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future. To set up the...
iPhone Top Left Hole Punch Face ID Feature Purple

New Leak Reveals iPhone 18 Pro Display Sizes, Under-Screen Face ID, and More

Wednesday January 14, 2026 7:09 am PST by
While the iPhone 18 Pro models are still around eight months away, a leaker has shared some alleged details about the devices. In a post on Chinese social media platform Weibo this week, the account Digital Chat Station said the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max will have the same 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch display sizes as the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. Consistent with previous...

Top Rated Comments

AttoA Avatar
65 months ago

Apple rushing beta software to market, again.
This vulnerability has been present for more than a decade in all sorts of UNIXes! It's not something at all limited to Apple's QA...
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Havalo Avatar
65 months ago


Attachment Image
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mannyvel Avatar
65 months ago

So, mostly free OSes. That's much of a defense....

Devs knew about the potential, and chose not to address it. They would rather rush a beta product to market.
One day you will learn more about software and you will look back at this comment and say "wow, I was totally clueless back then."
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Gabebear Avatar
65 months ago

Wow I thought this would have been patched out in 11.2. Hopefully we will get a
supplemental patch shortly.
It turns most fairly minor security issues into full-blown root exploits… fairly terrifying.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
opfor Avatar
65 months ago

I'd think we'd have better tools/procedures for finding bugs like this a lot sooner.

Is there not an automated tool that can look at some code and say "hey, right here it's possible for a heap overflow to occur and there's no error handling code to deal with it"?
Sure there are tools that catch some of these problems via static analysis etc and there are languages where this class of problems might not even occur.

But it is also true that the day that the CVE was released I updated my Linux servers and got a fixed/patched sudo, while even macOS 11.3 beta1 still has the issue, so this is also indicative of Apple release engineering capabilities, or lack of them.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
justperry Avatar
65 months ago

So is this a zero day, drive-by vulnerability? Or does the attacker have to have physical access?
Nope

"An attacker would need to gain low-level access to a system first to be able to exploit the bug, such as via planted malware."
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)